IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i19p3427-d920684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods for Mathematical Analysis of Simulated and Real Fractal Processes with Application in Cardiology

Author

Listed:
  • Evgeniya Gospodinova

    (Institute of Robotics, Bulgarian Academy of Science, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Penio Lebamovski

    (Institute of Robotics, Bulgarian Academy of Science, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Galya Georgieva-Tsaneva

    (Institute of Robotics, Bulgarian Academy of Science, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Galina Bogdanova

    (Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Bulgarian Academy of Science, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Diana Dimitrova

    (Faculty of Public Health, Medical University “Prof. Dr. P. Stoyanov”-Varna, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria)

Abstract

In the article, a comparative analysis is performed regarding the accuracy parameter in determining the degree of self-similarity of fractal processes between the following methods: Variance-Time plot, Rescaled Range (R/S), Wavelet-based, Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA) and Multifractal Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (MFDFA). To evaluate the methods, fractal processes based of Fractional Gaussian Noise were simulated and the dependence between the length of the simulated process and the degree of self-similarity was investigated by calculating the Hurst exponent (H > 0.5). It was found that the Wavelet-based, DFA and MFDFA methods, with a process length greater than 2 14 points, have a relative error of the Hurst exponent is less than 1%. A methodology for the Wavelet-based method related to determining the size of the scale and the wavelet algorithm was proposed, and it was investigated in terms of the exact determination of the Hurst exponent of two algorithms: Haar and Daubechies with different number of coefficients and different values of the scale. Based on the analysis, it was determined that the Daubechies algorithm with 10 coefficients and scale (i = 2, j = 10) has a relative error of less than 0.5%. The three most accurate methods are applied to the study of real cardiac signals of two groups of people: healthy and unhealthy (arrhythmia) subjects. The results of the statistical analysis, using the t-test, show that the proposed methods can distinguish the two studied groups and can be used for diagnostic purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Evgeniya Gospodinova & Penio Lebamovski & Galya Georgieva-Tsaneva & Galina Bogdanova & Diana Dimitrova, 2022. "Methods for Mathematical Analysis of Simulated and Real Fractal Processes with Application in Cardiology," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:19:p:3427-:d:920684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/19/3427/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/19/3427/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaël Kermarrec, 2020. "On Estimating the Hurst Parameter from Least-Squares Residuals. Case Study: Correlated Terrestrial Laser Scanner Range Noise," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Yicun Li & Yuanyang Teng, 2022. "Estimation of the Hurst Parameter in Spot Volatility," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-26, May.
    3. Raoul Nigmatullin & Semyon Dorokhin & Alexander Ivchenko, 2021. "Generalized Hurst Hypothesis: Description of Time-Series in Communication Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Laura Raisa Miloş & Cornel Haţiegan & Marius Cristian Miloş & Flavia Mirela Barna & Claudiu Boțoc, 2020. "Multifractal Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (MF-DFA) of Stock Market Indexes. Empirical Evidence from Seven Central and Eastern European Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Roman Kaminskiy & Nataliya Shakhovska & Jana Kajanová & Yurii Kryvenchuk, 2021. "Method of Distinguishing Styles by Fractal and Statistical Indicators of the Text as a Sequence of the Number of Letters in Its Words," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Kantelhardt, Jan W. & Zschiegner, Stephan A. & Koscielny-Bunde, Eva & Havlin, Shlomo & Bunde, Armin & Stanley, H.Eugene, 2002. "Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 316(1), pages 87-114.
    7. Mario Abundo & Enrica Pirozzi, 2019. "On the Integral of the Fractional Brownian Motion and Some Pseudo-Fractional Gaussian Processes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-12, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aslam, Faheem & Aziz, Saqib & Nguyen, Duc Khuong & Mughal, Khurrum S. & Khan, Maaz, 2020. "On the efficiency of foreign exchange markets in times of the COVID-19 pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. Antoniades, I.P. & Brandi, Giuseppe & Magafas, L. & Di Matteo, T., 2021. "The use of scaling properties to detect relevant changes in financial time series: A new visual warning tool," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 565(C).
    3. Sierra-Porta, D., 2024. "A multifractal approach to understanding Forbush Decrease events: Correlations with geomagnetic storms and space weather phenomena," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    4. Deniz Erer & Elif Erer & Selim Güngör, 2023. "The aggregate and sectoral time-varying market efficiency during crisis periods in Turkey: a comparative analysis with COVID-19 outbreak and the global financial crisis," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Yao, Can-Zhong & Mo, Yi-Na & Zhang, Ze-Kun, 2021. "A study of the efficiency of the Chinese clean energy stock market and its correlation with the crude oil market based on an asymmetric multifractal scaling behavior analysis," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    6. Katarzyna Czech & Łukasz Pietrych, 2021. "The Efficiency of the Polish Zloty Exchange Rate Market: The Uncovered Interest Parity and Fractal Analysis Approaches," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Memon, Bilal Ahmed & Yao, Hongxing & Naveed, Hafiz Muhammad, 2022. "Examining the efficiency and herding behavior of commodity markets using multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis. Empirical evidence from energy, agriculture, and metal markets," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Shrestha, Keshab & Naysary, Babak & Philip, Sheena Sara Suresh, 2023. "Fintech market efficiency: A multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    9. Farhang Rahmani & Mohammad Hadi Fattahi, 2021. "A multifractal cross-correlation investigation into sensitivity and dependence of meteorological and hydrological droughts on precipitation and temperature," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(3), pages 2197-2219, December.
    10. Nurulkamal Masseran, 2022. "Multifractal Characteristics on Temporal Maximum of Air Pollution Series," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Zhuang, Xiaoyang & Wei, Dan, 2022. "Asymmetric multifractality, comparative efficiency analysis of green finance markets: A dynamic study by index-based model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 604(C).
    12. Ioannis P. Antoniades & Giuseppe Brandi & L. G. Magafas & T. Di Matteo, 2020. "The use of scaling properties to detect relevant changes in financial time series: a new visual warning tool," Papers 2010.08890, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.
    13. Fousekis, Panos & Tzaferi, Dimitra, 2022. "Price multifractality and informational efficiency in the futures markets of the US soybean complex," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 66, pages 68-84.
    14. Wang, Jian & Huang, Menghao & Wu, Xinpei & Kim, Junseok, 2023. "A local fitting based multifractal detrend fluctuation analysis method," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 611(C).
    15. İşcanoğlu-Çekiç, Ayşegül & Gülteki̇n, Havva, 2019. "Are cross-correlations between Turkish Stock Exchange and three major country indices multifractal or monofractal?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 978-990.
    16. Lavička, Hynek & Kracík, Jiří, 2020. "Fluctuation analysis of electric power loads in Europe: Correlation multifractality vs. Distribution function multifractality," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    17. L. Telesca & T. Matcharashvili & T. Chelidze & N. Zhukova & Z. Javakhishvili, 2015. "Investigating the dynamical features of the time distribution of the reservoir-induced seismicity in Enguri area (Georgia)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 77(1), pages 117-125, May.
    18. Kakinaka, Shinji & Umeno, Ken, 2021. "Exploring asymmetric multifractal cross-correlations of price–volatility and asymmetric volatility dynamics in cryptocurrency markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    19. Longfeng Zhao & Wei Li & Andrea Fenu & Boris Podobnik & Yougui Wang & H. Eugene Stanley, 2017. "The q-dependent detrended cross-correlation analysis of stock market," Papers 1705.01406, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2017.
    20. Vitanov, Nikolay K. & Sakai, Kenshi & Dimitrova, Zlatinka I., 2008. "SSA, PCA, TDPSC, ACFA: Useful combination of methods for analysis of short and nonstationary time series," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 187-202.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:19:p:3427-:d:920684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.