IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i16p2923-d887800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Similarity Measure of Fuzzy Signatures with a Case Study Based on the Statistical Evaluation of Questionnaires Comparing the Influential Factors of Hungarian and Lithuanian Employee Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • László T. Kóczy

    (Department of Informatics, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Győr, Hungary
    Department of Telecommnnication and Media Informtics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 1111 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Dalia Susniene

    (School of Economics and Business, Kaunas University of Technology, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Ojaras Purvinis

    (School of Economics and Business, Kaunas University of Technology, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Márta Konczosné Szombathelyi

    (Department of Marketing and Management, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Győr, Hungary)

Abstract

Similarity between two fuzzy values, sets, etc., may be defined in various ways. The authors here attempt introducing a general similarity measure based on the direct extension of the Boolean minimal form of equivalence operation. It is further extended to hierarchically structured multicomponent fuzzy signatures. Two versions of this measure, one based on the classic min–max operations and one based on the strictly monotonic algebraic norms, are proposed for practical application. A real example from management science is chosen, namely the comparison of employee attitudes in two different populations. This example has application possibilities in the evaluation and analysis of employee behaviour in companies as, due to the complex aspects in analysing multifaceted behavioural paradigms in organizational management, it is difficult for companies to make reliable decisions in creating processes for better social interactions between employees. In the paper, the authors go through the steps of building a model for exploring a set of different features, where a statistical pre-processing step enables the identification of the interdependency and thus the setup of the fuzzy signature structure suitable to describe the partially redundant answers given to a standard questionnaire and the comparison of them with help of the (pair of the) new similarity measures. As a side result in management science, by using an internationally applied standard questionnaire for exploring the factors of employee engagement and using a sample of data obtained from Hungarian and Lithuanian firms, it was found that responses in Hungary and Lithuania were partially different, and the employee attitude was thus in general different although in some questions an unambiguous similarity could be also discovered.

Suggested Citation

  • László T. Kóczy & Dalia Susniene & Ojaras Purvinis & Márta Konczosné Szombathelyi, 2022. "A New Similarity Measure of Fuzzy Signatures with a Case Study Based on the Statistical Evaluation of Questionnaires Comparing the Influential Factors of Hungarian and Lithuanian Employee Engagement," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-24, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:16:p:2923-:d:887800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/16/2923/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/16/2923/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donia, Magda B.L. & Tetrault Sirsly, Carol-Ann, 2016. "Determinants and consequences of employee attributions of corporate social responsibility as substantive or symbolic," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 232-242.
    2. Dorothea Wahyu Ariani, 2013. "The Relationship between Employee Engagement, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Counterproductive Work Behavior," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(2), pages 46-56, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jialu Hao & Wei Wu & Shuo Wang & Xiaoge Zhong & Guang Chu & Feng Shao, 2022. "A Delegation Attack Method on Attribute-Based Signatures and Probable Solutions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guosen Miao & Guoping Chen & Fan Wang & Anupam Kumar Das, 2023. "The Effect of Corporate Greenwashing on Employees’ Environmental Performance: Person–Organization Values Fit Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Ishizaka, Alessio & Gupta, Manish & Shankar, Amit, 2022. "Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1378-1393.
    3. Mehran Nejati & Azadeh Shafaei, 2023. "Why do employees respond differently to corporate social responsibility? A study of substantive and symbolic corporate social responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 2066-2080, July.
    4. Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Antonino Callea & Amelia Manuti, 2022. "“I Like It like That”: A Study on the Relationship between Psychological Capital, Work Engagement and Extra-Role Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Jamila Majid & Sayma Zia & Bashir Ahmad, 2017. "Impact Of Generational Differences On Employees’ Preferences For Engagement - Enablers And Drivers At Feroze1888 Mills Ltd," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 13(1), pages 13-13.
    6. Misani, Nicola, 2020. "Sustainability and Implicit Contracts," MPRA Paper 104963, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Petra Jarkovská, 2021. "Understanding the link between the organizations social responsibility and employees work attitudes in tourism industry setting," Economics Working Papers 2021-02, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics.
    8. Marta Pizzetti & Lucia Gatti & Peter Seele, 2021. "Firms Talk, Suppliers Walk: Analyzing the Locus of Greenwashing in the Blame Game and Introducing ‘Vicarious Greenwashing’," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 21-38, April.
    9. Xiang, Yilin & Chen, Lu & Zhang, Zhenya & Sun, Xinyu, 2024. "Does perceived greenwashing promote or inhibit ethical voice? Effects of moral disengagement and perceived competitive pressure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    10. Leiv Opstad, 2021. "Different Views about Job Opportunities among Business and Economics Students Depending on Personality Traits," Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Eurasian Publications, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13.
    11. John D’Arcy & Idris Adjerid & Corey M. Angst & Ante Glavas, 2020. "Too Good to Be True: Firm Social Performance and the Risk of Data Breach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1200-1223, December.
    12. Jamal Abdul Nasir Ansari, 2020. "Driving Employee Engagement Through Five Personality Traits: An Exploratory Study," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 19(2), pages 94-105, December.
    13. Xinming Deng & Xianyi Long & Douglas A. Schuler & Huan Luo & Xiaofei Zhao, 2020. "External corporate social responsibility and labor productivity: A S‐curve relationship and the moderating role of internal CSR and government subsidy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 393-408, January.
    14. Jennifer L. Robertson & A. Wren Montgomery & Timur Ozbilir, 2023. "Employees' response to corporate greenwashing," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4015-4027, November.
    15. Yvette Sterbenk & Sara Champlin & Kasey Windels & Summer Shelton, 2022. "Is Femvertising the New Greenwashing? Examining Corporate Commitment to Gender Equality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(3), pages 491-505, May.
    16. Lianidou, Theano & Zhu, Di, 2023. "Corporate social purpose statements and employee perceptions about the CEO and the corporation: A large sample natural experiment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    17. Tobias Hahn & Garima Sharma & Ante Glavas, 2024. "Employee‐CSR Tensions: Drivers of Employee (Dis)Engagement with Contested CSR Initiatives," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1364-1392, June.
    18. Sabrina Scheidler & Laura Marie Edinger-Schons & Jelena Spanjol & Jan Wieseke, 2019. "Scrooge Posing as Mother Teresa: How Hypocritical Social Responsibility Strategies Hurt Employees and Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 339-358, June.
    19. Ms. Ginu George & Dr. Binoy Joseph, 2014. "A Study on Employees’ Engagement Level in Travel Organisations with Reference to Karnataka," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 5(3), pages 08-15, September.
    20. Rana Muhammad Shahid Yaqub & Nazim Hussain & Shanayyara Mahmood & Zahra Farooq, 2021. "Linking Compensation, Employee Engagement, Employee Loyalty And Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role Of Organization Commitment," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 10(3), pages 17-32.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:16:p:2923-:d:887800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.