IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i11p1897-d830094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Integrating Data Envelopment Analysis and Spherical Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Sustainable Supplier Selection in Steel Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Thi-Ly Nguyen

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan)

  • Phi-Hung Nguyen

    (Research Center of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business, FPT University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
    Department of Business Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

  • Hong-Anh Pham

    (Research Center of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business, FPT University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Thi-Giang Nguyen

    (Research Center of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business, FPT University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Duc-Thinh Nguyen

    (Research Center of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business, FPT University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Thi-Hoai Tran

    (Research Center of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business, FPT University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Hong-Cham Le

    (Research Center of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business, FPT University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Huong-Thuy Phung

    (Research Center of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business, FPT University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

Abstract

Supply chain sustainability, which takes environmental, economic, and social factors into account, was recently recognized as a critical component of the supply chain (SC) management evaluation process and known as a multi-criteria decision-making problem (MCDM) that is heavily influenced by the decision-makers. While some criteria can be analyzed numerically, a large number of qualitative criteria require expert review in linguistic terms. This study proposes an integration of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (SF-AHP), and spherical fuzzy weighted aggregated sum product assessment (SF-WASPAS) to identify a sustainable supplier for the steel manufacturing industry in Vietnam. In this study, both quantitative and qualitative factors are considered through a comprehensive literature review and expert interviews. The first step employs DEA to validate high-efficiency suppliers based on a variety of quantifiable criteria. The second step evaluates these suppliers further on qualitative criteria, such as economic, environmental, and social factors. The SF-AHP was applied to obtain the criteria’s significance, whereas the SF-WASPAS was adopted to identify sustainable suppliers. The sensitivity analysis and comparative results demonstrate that the decision framework is feasible and robust. The findings of this study can assist steel industry executives in resolving the macrolevel supplier selection problem. Moreover, the proposed method can assist managers in selecting and evaluating suppliers more successfully in other industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Thi-Ly Nguyen & Phi-Hung Nguyen & Hong-Anh Pham & Thi-Giang Nguyen & Duc-Thinh Nguyen & Thi-Hoai Tran & Hong-Cham Le & Huong-Thuy Phung, 2022. "A Novel Integrating Data Envelopment Analysis and Spherical Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Sustainable Supplier Selection in Steel Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:11:p:1897-:d:830094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/11/1897/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/11/1897/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kannan, Devika & Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa & Jabbour, Charbel José Chiappetta, 2014. "Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 432-447.
    2. Saeid Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi & Shabnam Rahnamay Bonab & Ali Memarpour Ghiaci & Gholamreza Haseli & Hana Tomaskova & Mostafa Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, 2021. "Landfill Site Selection for Medical Waste Using an Integrated SWARA-WASPAS Framework Based on Spherical Fuzzy Set," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Phi-Hung Nguyen & Lin Hsu-Hao & Hong-Anh Pham & Huong Le Thi & Quynh Mai Do & Dieu Huong Nguyen & Thu-Ha Nguyen, 2022. "Material Sourcing Characteristics and Firm Performance: An Empirical Study in Vietnam," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2010. "An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA - A third pole of technical efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1554-1563, December.
    5. Ahmad Jafarnejad & Manoucher Ansari & Hossein Rahmany Youshanlouei & Mohammad Mood, 2012. "A Hybrid MCDM Approach for Solving the ERP System Selection Problem with Application to Steel Industry," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 8(3), pages 54-73, July.
    6. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    7. Chia-Nan Wang & Phi-Hung Nguyen & Thi-Ly Nguyen & Thi-Giang Nguyen & Duc-Thinh Nguyen & Thi-Hoai Tran & Hong-Cham Le & Huong-Thuy Phung, 2022. "A Two-Stage DEA Approach to Measure Operational Efficiency in Vietnam’s Port Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Kaoru Tone & Miki Tsutsui, 2010. "An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA revisited -A third pole of technical efficiency," GRIPS Discussion Papers 09-21, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    9. Phi-Hung Nguyen & Jung-Fa Tsai & Thanh-Tuan Dang & Ming-Hua Lin & Hong-Anh Pham & Kim-Anh Nguyen, 2021. "A Hybrid Spherical Fuzzy MCDM Approach to Prioritize Governmental Intervention Strategies against the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study from Vietnam," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-26, October.
    10. De Marchi, Valentina, 2012. "Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 614-623.
    11. Doyle, J & Green, R, 1993. "Data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 713-715, November.
    12. Guest, Ross, 2010. "The economics of sustainability in the context of climate change: An overview," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 326-335, October.
    13. Mahdiloo, Mahdi & Saen, Reza Farzipoor & Lee, Ki-Hoon, 2015. "Technical, environmental and eco-efficiency measurement for supplier selection: An extension and application of data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 279-289.
    14. Azimifard, Arezoo & Moosavirad, Seyed Hamed & Ariafar, Shahram, 2018. "Selecting sustainable supplier countries for Iran's steel industry at three levels by using AHP and TOPSIS methods," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 30-44.
    15. Yongrok Choi & Yanni Yu & Hyoung Seok Lee, 2018. "A Study on the Sustainable Performance of the Steel Industry in Korea Based on SBM-DEA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bihter Gizem Demircan & Kaan Yetilmezsoy, 2023. "A Hybrid Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Approach for Implementation of Smart Sustainable Waste Management Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Alina Alb Lupaş, 2023. "Fuzzy Differential Subordination and Superordination Results for Fractional Integral Associated with Dziok-Srivastava Operator," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Phi-Hung Nguyen, 2023. "A Fully Completed Spherical Fuzzy Data-Driven Model for Analyzing Employee Satisfaction in Logistics Service Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-34, May.
    4. Radosław Depczyński & Jim Secka & Katarzyna Cheba & Carlotta D’Alessandro & Katarzyna Szopik-Depczyńska, 2023. "Decision-Making Approach in Sustainability Assessment in Steel Manufacturing Companies—Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Bouraima, Mouhamed Bayane & Ayyildiz, Ertugrul & Badi, Ibrahim & Murat, Mirac & Es, Huseyin Avni & Pamucar, Dragan, 2024. "A decision support system for assessing the barriers and policies for wind energy deployment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zebin Zheng & Wenjun Xiao & Ziye Cheng, 2023. "China’s Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency Assessment Based on Coordinated Reduction in Pollution and Carbon Emission: From the 11th to the 13th Five-Year Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Ze Tian & Fang-Rong Ren & Qin-Wen Xiao & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tai-Yu Lin, 2019. "Cross-Regional Comparative Study on Carbon Emission Efficiency of China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on the Meta-Frontier," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Dyckhoff, Harald & Souren, Rainer, 2022. "Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis and production theory for performance evaluation: Framework and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 795-816.
    4. Zhou, Anhua & Li, Jun, 2021. "Investigate the impact of market reforms on the improvement of manufacturing energy efficiency under China’s provincial-level data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Cui, Qiang & Li, Ye, 2020. "A cross efficiency distinguishing method to explore the cooperation degree in dynamic airline environmental efficiency," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 31-43.
    6. Pengfei Zhang & Hu Yu & Mingzhe Shen & Wei Guo, 2022. "Evaluation of Tourism Development Efficiency and Spatial Spillover Effect Based on EBM Model: The Case of Hainan Island, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Feng Dong & Chang Qin & Xiaoyun Zhang & Xu Zhao & Yuling Pan & Yujin Gao & Jiao Zhu & Yangfan Li, 2021. "Towards Carbon Neutrality: The Impact of Renewable Energy Development on Carbon Emission Efficiency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-23, December.
    8. An, Qingxian & Tao, Xiangyang & Xiong, Beibei & Chen, Xiaohong, 2022. "Frontier-based incentive mechanisms for allocating common revenues or fixed costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 294-308.
    9. Chia-Nan Wang & Kristofer Neal Castro Imperial & Ching-Chien Huang & Thanh-Tuan Dang, 2022. "Output Targeting and Runway Utilization of Major International Airports: A Comparative Analysis Using DEA," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Ren, Fang-rong & Tian, Ze & Liu, Jingjing & Shen, Yu-ting, 2020. "Analysis of CO2 emission reduction contribution and efficiency of China’s solar photovoltaic industry: Based on Input-output perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    11. Xingle Long & Chuanwang Sun & Chao Wu & Bin Chen & Kofi Agyenim Boateng, 2020. "Green innovation efficiency across China’s 30 provinces: estimate, comparison, and convergence," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 1243-1260, October.
    12. Liangen Zeng, 2021. "China’s Eco-Efficiency: Regional Differences and Influencing Factors Based on a Spatial Panel Data Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Zhou, Anhua & Xin, Ling & Li, Jun, 2022. "Assessing the impact of the carbon market on the improvement of China's energy and carbon emission performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    14. Liangen Zeng, 2022. "The Driving Mechanism of Urban Land Green Use Efficiency in China Based on the EBM Model with Undesirable Outputs and the Spatial Dubin Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Cheng, Gang & Qian, Zhenhua, 2011. "An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA - An alternative method for the affinity index," MPRA Paper 41680, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 06 Nov 2011.
    16. Zhao, Pengjun & Zeng, Liangen & Li, Peilin & Lu, Haiyan & Hu, Haoyu & Li, Chengming & Zheng, Mengyuan & Li, Haitao & Yu, Zhao & Yuan, Dandan & Xie, Jinxin & Huang, Qi & Qi, Yuting, 2022. "China's transportation sector carbon dioxide emissions efficiency and its influencing factors based on the EBM DEA model with undesirable outputs and spatial Durbin model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    17. Cui, Qiang & Li, Ye, 2017. "Airline efficiency measures using a Dynamic Epsilon-Based Measure model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 121-134.
    18. Qin, Quande & Li, Xin & Li, Li & Zhen, Wei & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2017. "Air emissions perspective on energy efficiency: An empirical analysis of China’s coastal areas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 604-614.
    19. A. M. Aldanondo & V. L. Casasnovas, 2015. "Input aggregation bias in technical efficiency with multiple criteria analysis," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 430-435, April.
    20. Harald Dyckhoff & Katrin Allen, 1999. "Theoretische Begründung einer Effizienzanalyse mittels Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 411-436, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:11:p:1897-:d:830094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.