Author
Listed:
- Bouraima, Mouhamed Bayane
- Ayyildiz, Ertugrul
- Badi, Ibrahim
- Murat, Mirac
- Es, Huseyin Avni
- Pamucar, Dragan
Abstract
Addressing Africa's energy infrastructure gap, including generation, distribution, and transmission, demands substantial investment, with a portion allocated to renewable energy technologies like wind energy. The significant scale-up of wind energy can yield substantial socioeconomic benefits for countries. However, there are barriers that, if not adequately addressed, can impede its adoption and expansion across the continent. For the first time, this study assessed these barriers and associated policies for its deployment using spherical fuzzy sets (SFSs), which enables modeling vagueness in evaluations while reducing bias. The study presents a decision support system incorporating the Best Worst Method (BWM), Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC), and VIšeKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) within a spherical fuzzy (SF) framework. Five policy alternatives were considered, and to rank them, 23 barriers were identified and categorized into five main groups based on a literature review and expert opinions. Subsequently, the BWM and SF-CRITIC methods were utilized to establish both subjective and objective weights for these barriers. Finally, the SF-VIKOR method was employed to rank the five policy alternatives. While the most critical barriers include “Not in My Backyard” (NIMBY) concerns, limited subsidies compared to fossil fuels, the absence of institutions and mechanisms for information dissemination, non-liberalized market, and a shortage of critical human resources, the most appropriate policy remains the renewable obligations standard (ROS). Sensitivity analysis was applied to demonstrate the robustness of the proposed methodology.
Suggested Citation
Bouraima, Mouhamed Bayane & Ayyildiz, Ertugrul & Badi, Ibrahim & Murat, Mirac & Es, Huseyin Avni & Pamucar, Dragan, 2024.
"A decision support system for assessing the barriers and policies for wind energy deployment,"
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:rensus:v:200:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124002971
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114571
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:200:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124002971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.