IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p13950-d704756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landfill Site Selection for Medical Waste Using an Integrated SWARA-WASPAS Framework Based on Spherical Fuzzy Set

Author

Listed:
  • Saeid Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi

    (Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia 57166, Iran)

  • Shabnam Rahnamay Bonab

    (Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia 57166, Iran)

  • Ali Memarpour Ghiaci

    (Industrial Engineering Department, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran 15875, Iran)

  • Gholamreza Haseli

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Economic, Management and Social Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz 71345, Iran)

  • Hana Tomaskova

    (Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, 50003 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic)

  • Mostafa Hajiaghaei-Keshteli

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Puebla 38115, Mexico)

Abstract

Selecting suitable locations for the disposal of medical waste is a serious matter. This study aims to propose a novel approach to selecting the optimal landfill for medical waste using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods. For better considerations of the uncertainty in choosing the optimal landfill, the MCDM methods are extended by spherical fuzzy sets (SFS). The identified criteria affecting the selection of the optimal location for landfilling medical waste include three categories; environmental, economic, and social. Moreover, the weights of the 13 criteria were computed by Spherical Fuzzy Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SFSWARA). In the next step, the alternatives were analyzed and ranked using Spherical Fuzzy Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (SFWASPAS). Finally, in order to show the accuracy and validity of the results, the proposed approach was compared with the IF-SWARA-WASPAS method. Examination of the results showed that in the IF environment the ranking is not complete, and the results of the proposed method are more reliable. Furthermore, ten scenarios were created by changing the weight of the criteria, and the results were compared with the proposed method. The overall results were similar to the SF-SWARA-WASPAS method.

Suggested Citation

  • Saeid Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi & Shabnam Rahnamay Bonab & Ali Memarpour Ghiaci & Gholamreza Haseli & Hana Tomaskova & Mostafa Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, 2021. "Landfill Site Selection for Medical Waste Using an Integrated SWARA-WASPAS Framework Based on Spherical Fuzzy Set," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13950-:d:704756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13950/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13950/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diego Mota Vieira & Yuri de Souza Odaguri Enes & Adler Gabriel Silva Campos & Omar Ouro-Salim & Patrícia Guarnieri, 2024. "A model of the consumer decision-making process for the disposal of goods," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 28423-28448, November.
    2. Kadir Kırda & Ahmet Aytekin, 2024. "Assessing industrialized countries’ environmental sustainability performances using an integrated multi-criteria model and software," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 17505-17550, July.
    3. Çelik, Sefa & Peker, İskender & Gök-Kısa, A. Cansu & Büyüközkan, Gülçin, 2023. "Multi-criteria evaluation of medical waste management process under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case study on hospitals in Turkey," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. Thi-Ly Nguyen & Phi-Hung Nguyen & Hong-Anh Pham & Thi-Giang Nguyen & Duc-Thinh Nguyen & Thi-Hoai Tran & Hong-Cham Le & Huong-Thuy Phung, 2022. "A Novel Integrating Data Envelopment Analysis and Spherical Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Sustainable Supplier Selection in Steel Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Youqing Lv & Guojian Ma & Juan Ding, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Medical Waste Disposal in China under Different Reward and Penalty Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Kasım Şimşek & Selçuk Alp, 2022. "Evaluation of Landfill Site Selection by Combining Fuzzy Tools in GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study in Diyarbakır, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Abbas, Hasnain & Zhao, Lindu & Gong, Xi & Faiz, Narmeen, 2023. "The perishable products case to achieve sustainable food quality and safety goals implementing on-field sustainable supply chain model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    8. Yang, Zhen & Dong, Xiaobin & Guo, Li, 2023. "Scenario inference model of urban metro system cascading failure under extreme rainfall conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    9. Saeid Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi & Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman & Moein Soltanzadeh & Muhammad Zeeshan Rafique & Hernadewita & Fatemeh Yadegar Marangalo & Ahmad Rasdan Ismail, 2023. "Assessing Sustainable Passenger Transportation Systems to Address Climate Change Based on MCDM Methods in an Uncertain Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Mohammad Kaviyani Charati & Fatemeh Gholian-Jouybari & Mostafa Hajiaghaei-Keshteli & Mohammad Mahdi Paydar & Fatemeh Sadeghi, 2024. "Designing a sustainable dental tourism supply chain considering waste treatment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 173-214, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13950-:d:704756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.