IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i10p1621-d812347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling Trade Durations Using Dynamic Logarithmic Component ACD Model with Extended Generalised Inverse Gaussian Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Yiing Fei Tan

    (Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Kok Haur Ng

    (Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • You Beng Koh

    (Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Shelton Peiris

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)

Abstract

This paper proposes a logarithmic version of the two-component ACD (LogCACD) model with no restrictions on the sign of the model parameters while allowing the expected durations to be decomposed into the long- and short-run components to capture the dynamics of these durations. The extended generalised inverse Gaussian (EGIG) distribution is used for the error distribution as its hazard function consists of a roller-coaster shape for certain parameters’ values. An empirical application from the trade durations of International Business Machines stock index has been carried out to investigate this proposed model. Extensive comparisons are carried out to evaluate the modelling and forecasting performances of the proposed model with several benchmark models and different specifications of error distributions. The result reveals that the LogCACD EGIG (1,1) model gives the best in-sample fit based on the Akaike information criterion and other criteria. Furthermore, the estimated parameters obtained through the maximum likelihood estimation confirm the existence of the roller-coaster-shaped hazard function. The examination of LogCACD EGIG (1,1) model also provides the best out-of-sample forecasts evaluated based on the mean square forecast error using the Hansen’s model confidence set. Lastly, different levels of time-at-risk forecasts are provided and tested with Kupiec likelihood ratio test.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiing Fei Tan & Kok Haur Ng & You Beng Koh & Shelton Peiris, 2022. "Modelling Trade Durations Using Dynamic Logarithmic Component ACD Model with Extended Generalised Inverse Gaussian Distribution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:10:p:1621-:d:812347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/10/1621/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/10/1621/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luc Bauwens & Pierre Giot, 2003. "Asymmetric ACD models: Introducing price information in ACD models," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 709-731, November.
    2. Fernandes, Marcelo & Grammig, Joachim, 2006. "A family of autoregressive conditional duration models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Saranjeet Kaur Bhogal & Ramanathan Thekke Variyam, 2019. "Conditional Duration Models For High‐Frequency Data: A Review On Recent Developments," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 252-273, February.
    4. Paul H. Kupiec, 1995. "Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 95-24, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    5. De Luca, Giovanni & Zuccolotto, Paola, 2006. "Regime-switching Pareto distributions for ACD models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 2179-2191, December.
    6. Ghysels, Eric & Gourieroux, Christian & Jasiak, Joann, 2004. "Stochastic volatility duration models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 413-433, April.
    7. Nikolaus Hautsch, 2003. "Assessing the Risk of Liquidity Suppliers on the Basis of Excess Demand Intensities," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 189-215.
    8. Peter R. Hansen & Asger Lunde & James M. Nason, 2011. "The Model Confidence Set," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 453-497, March.
    9. repec:bla:jecsur:v:22:y:2008:i:4:p:711-751 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Robert F. Engle, 2000. "The Econometrics of Ultra-High Frequency Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Luc Bauwens & Pierre Giot, 2000. "The Logarithmic ACD Model: An Application to the Bid-Ask Quote Process of Three NYSE Stocks," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 60, pages 117-149.
    12. David Easley & Robert F. Engle & Maureen O'Hara & Liuren Wu, 2008. "Time-Varying Arrival Rates of Informed and Uninformed Trades," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 171-207, Spring.
    13. Nikolaus Hautsch, 2012. "Econometrics of Financial High-Frequency Data," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-642-21925-2, July.
    14. Christoffersen, Peter F, 1998. "Evaluating Interval Forecasts," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 39(4), pages 841-862, November.
    15. repec:adr:anecst:y:2000:i:60:p:05 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Joachim Grammig & Kai-Oliver Maurer, 2000. "Non-monotonic hazard functions and the autoregressive conditional duration model," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 3(1), pages 16-38.
    17. Robert F. Engle & Jeffrey R. Russell, 1998. "Autoregressive Conditional Duration: A New Model for Irregularly Spaced Transaction Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(5), pages 1127-1162, September.
    18. R. P. Yatigammana & J. S. K. Chan & R. H. Gerlach, 2019. "Forecasting trade durations via ACD models with mixture distributions," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(12), pages 2051-2067, December.
    19. Mauro Bernardi & Leopoldo Catania, 2018. "The model confidence set package for R," International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(2), pages 144-158.
    20. Allen, David & Chan, Felix & McAleer, Michael & Peiris, Shelton, 2008. "Finite sample properties of the QMLE for the Log-ACD model: Application to Australian stocks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 163-185, November.
    21. Engle, Robert F. & White (the late), Halbert (ed.), 1999. "Cointegration, Causality, and Forecasting: Festschrift in Honour of Clive W. J. Granger," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198296836.
    22. Zhang, Michael Yuanjie & Russell, Jeffrey R. & Tsay, Ruey S., 2001. "A nonlinear autoregressive conditional duration model with applications to financial transaction data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 179-207, August.
    23. Joann Jasiak, 1996. "Persistence in Intertrade Durations," Working Papers 1999_8, York University, Department of Economics, revised Mar 1999.
    24. Easley, David, et al, 1996. "Liquidity, Information, and Infrequently Traded Stocks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 51(4), pages 1405-1436, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roman Huptas, 2014. "Bayesian Estimation and Prediction for ACD Models in the Analysis of Trade Durations from the Polish Stock Market," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 6(4), pages 237-273, December.
    2. Roman Huptas, 2016. "The UHF-GARCH-Type Model in the Analysis of Intraday Volatility and Price Durations – the Bayesian Approach," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Roman Huptas, 2019. "Point forecasting of intraday volume using Bayesian autoregressive conditional volume models," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(4), pages 293-310, July.
    4. Saulo, Helton & Balakrishnan, Narayanaswamy & Vila, Roberto, 2023. "On a quantile autoregressive conditional duration model," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 425-448.
    5. repec:bla:jecsur:v:22:y:2008:i:4:p:711-751 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Danúbia R. Cunha & Roberto Vila & Helton Saulo & Rodrigo N. Fernandez, 2020. "A General Family of Autoregressive Conditional Duration Models Applied to High-Frequency Financial Data," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Vasileios Siakoulis & Ioannis Venetis, 2015. "On inter-arrival times of bond market extreme events. An application to seven European markets," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 39(4), pages 717-741, October.
    8. Luc, BAUWENS & Nikolaus, HAUTSCH, 2006. "Modelling Financial High Frequency Data Using Point Processes," Discussion Papers (ECON - Département des Sciences Economiques) 2006039, Université catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques.
    9. Wei Sun & Svetlozar Rachev & Frank Fabozzi & Petko Kalev, 2008. "Fractals in trade duration: capturing long-range dependence and heavy tailedness in modeling trade duration," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 217-241, March.
    10. Dimitrakopoulos, Stefanos & Tsionas, Mike G. & Aknouche, Abdelhakim, 2020. "Ordinal-response models for irregularly spaced transactions: A forecasting exercise," MPRA Paper 103250, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Oct 2020.
    11. Allen, David & Lazarov, Zdravetz & McAleer, Michael & Peiris, Shelton, 2009. "Comparison of alternative ACD models via density and interval forecasts: Evidence from the Australian stock market," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(8), pages 2535-2555.
    12. Fernandes, Marcelo & Grammig, Joachim, 2005. "Nonparametric specification tests for conditional duration models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 35-68, July.
    13. Dionne, Georges & Pacurar, Maria & Zhou, Xiaozhou, 2015. "Liquidity-adjusted Intraday Value at Risk modeling and risk management: An application to data from Deutsche Börse," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 202-219.
    14. Bhatti, Chad R., 2010. "The Birnbaum–Saunders autoregressive conditional duration model," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 80(10), pages 2062-2078.
    15. Araichi, Sawssen & Peretti, Christian de & Belkacem, Lotfi, 2016. "Solvency capital requirement for a temporal dependent losses in insurance," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 588-598.
    16. Nikolaus Hautsch & Peter Malec & Melanie Schienle, 2014. "Capturing the Zero: A New Class of Zero-Augmented Distributions and Multiplicative Error Processes," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 89-121.
    17. Li, Zhicheng & Chen, Xinyun & Xing, Haipeng, 2023. "A multifactor regime-switching model for inter-trade durations in the high-frequency limit order market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    18. Stanislav Anatolyev & Dmitry Shakin, 2006. "Trade intensity in the Russian stock market:dynamics, distribution and determinants," Working Papers w0070, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
    19. Zhicheng Li & Haipeng Xing & Xinyun Chen, 2019. "A multifactor regime-switching model for inter-trade durations in the limit order market," Papers 1912.00764, arXiv.org.
    20. Anthony Tay & Christopher Ting & Yiu Kuen Tse & Mitch Warachka, 2007. "Modeling Transaction Data of Trade Direction and Estimation of Probability of Informed Trading," Finance Working Papers 22483, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    21. Yong Shi & Wei Dai & Wen Long & Bo Li, 2021. "Improved ACD-based financial trade durations prediction leveraging LSTM networks and Attention Mechanism," Papers 2101.02736, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:10:p:1621-:d:812347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.