IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v8y2024i3p72-d1436346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Examination of Human Fast and Frugal Heuristic Decisions for Truckload Spot Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Haughton

    (Lazaridis School of Business and Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada)

  • Alireza Amini

    (Lazaridis School of Business and Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada)

Abstract

Background : One of several logistics contexts in which pricing decisions are made involves truckload carriers using reverse auctions to bid for prices they want for their transportation services while operating under uncertainty about factors such as their (i) operations costs and (ii) rivals’ bids. This study’s main purpose is to explore humans’ use of fast and frugal heuristics (FFHs) to navigate those uncertainties. In particular, the study clarifies the logic, theoretical underpinnings, and performance of human FFHs. Methods : The study uses behavior experiments as its core research method. Results : The study’s key findings are that humans use rational FFHs, yet, despite the rationality, human decisions yield average profits that are 35% below profits from price optimization models. The study also found that human FFHs yield very unstable outcomes: the FFH coefficient of variation in profit is twice as large as price optimization. Novel contributions inherent in these findings include (a) clarifying connections between spot market auction pricing and behavioral theories and (b) adding truckload spot markets to the literature’s contexts for measuring performance gaps between human FFHs and optimization models. Conclusions : The contributions have implications for practical purposes that include gauging spot pricing decisions made under constraints such as limited access to price optimization tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Haughton & Alireza Amini, 2024. "An Examination of Human Fast and Frugal Heuristic Decisions for Truckload Spot Pricing," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:8:y:2024:i:3:p:72-:d:1436346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/8/3/72/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/8/3/72/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lafkihi, Mariam & Pan, Shenle & Ballot, Eric, 2019. "Freight transportation service procurement: A literature review and future research opportunities in omnichannel E-commerce," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 348-365.
    2. Andreas C. Drichoutis & Rodolfo M. Nayga & Panagiotis Lazaridis, 2011. "The Role of Training in Experimental Auctions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 93(2), pages 521-527.
    3. Loomes, Graham & Sugden, Robert, 1982. "Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 92(368), pages 805-824, December.
    4. Mariam Lafkihi & Shenle Pan & Eric Ballot, 2019. "Freight transportation service procurement: A literature review and future research opportunities in omnichannel E-commerce," Post-Print hal-02086154, HAL.
    5. Toptal, Aysegül & Bingöl, Safa Onur, 2011. "Transportation pricing of a truckload carrier," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 559-567, November.
    6. Huseyin Topaloglu & Warren Powell, 2007. "Incorporating Pricing Decisions into the Stochastic Dynamic Fleet Management Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 281-301, August.
    7. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Zolfagharinia, Hossein & Haughton, Michael, 2016. "Effective truckload dispatch decision methods with incomplete advance load information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 103-121.
    9. Özkaya, Evren & Keskinocak, PInar & Roshan Joseph, V. & Weight, Ryan, 2010. "Estimating and benchmarking Less-than-Truckload market rates," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 667-682, September.
    10. Powell, Warren B., 1985. "Marginal cost pricing of truckload services: A comparison of two approaches," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 433-445, October.
    11. Kuyzu, Gültekin & Akyol, Çağla Gül & Ergun, Özlem & Savelsbergh, Martin, 2015. "Bid price optimization for truckload carriers in simultaneous transportation procurement auctions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 34-58.
    12. G J King & H Topaloglu, 2007. "Incorporating the pricing decisions into the dynamic fleet management problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(8), pages 1065-1074, August.
    13. Elena Katok & Douglas Thomas & Andrew Davis, 2008. "Inventory Service-Level Agreements as Coordination Mechanisms: The Effect of Review Periods," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 609-624, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Park, Arim & Chen, Roger & Cho, Soohyun & Zhao, Yao, 2023. "The determinants of online matching platforms for freight services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. Kuyzu, Gültekin & Akyol, Çağla Gül & Ergun, Özlem & Savelsbergh, Martin, 2015. "Bid price optimization for truckload carriers in simultaneous transportation procurement auctions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 34-58.
    3. Hammami, Farouk & Rekik, Monia & Coelho, Leandro C., 2021. "Exact and hybrid heuristic methods to solve the combinatorial bid construction problem with stochastic prices in truckload transportation services procurement auctions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 204-229.
    4. Qiu, Xuan & Xu, Su Xiu & Xu, Gangyan, 2021. "Pricing and scheduling of barge hinterland transportation service for inbound containers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    5. Martín Egozcue & Xu Guo & Wing-Keung Wong, 2015. "Optimal output for the regret-averse competitive firm under price uncertainty," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 5(2), pages 279-295, December.
    6. Embrey, Matthew & Seel, Christian & Philipp Reiss, J., 2024. "Gambling in risk-taking contests: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 570-585.
    7. Camille Magron & Maxime Merli, 2012. "Stocks repurchase and sophistication of individual investors," Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center 2012-02, Laboratoire de Recherche en Gestion et Economie (LaRGE), Université de Strasbourg.
    8. Enrico G. De Giorgi & Thierry Post, 2011. "Loss Aversion with a State-Dependent Reference Point," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1094-1110, June.
    9. Tonin, Stefania, 2018. "Citizens’ perspectives on marine protected areas as a governance strategy to effectively preserve marine ecosystem services and biodiversity," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PB), pages 189-200.
    10. Oyakhilome IBHAGUI, 2017. "Optimal Asset Allocation of a Pension Fund: Does The Fear of Regret Matter?," Journal of Economics Library, KSP Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 130-159, June.
    11. Franz Dietrich & Antonios Staras & Robert Sugden, 2021. "Savage’s response to Allais as Broomean reasoning," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 143-164, April.
    12. Soora Rasouli & Harry Timmermans, 2017. "Specification of regret-based models of choice behaviour: formal analyses and experimental design based evidence," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1555-1576, November.
    13. Pedro Bordalo & Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer, 2013. "Salience and Consumer Choice," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 121(5), pages 803-843.
    14. Raquel M. Gaspar & Paulo M. Silva, 2023. "Investors’ perspective on portfolio insurance," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 22(1), pages 49-79, January.
    15. Yuval Rottenstreich & Alex Markle & Johannes Müller-Trede, 2023. "Risky Sure Things," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(8), pages 4707-4720, August.
    16. Oben K Bayrak & Bengt Kriström, 2016. "Is there a valuation gap? The case of interval valuations," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(1), pages 218-236.
    17. Ulrich Schmidt & Stefan Traub, 2009. "An Experimental Investigation of the Disparity Between WTA and WTP for Lotteries," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 229-262, March.
    18. Yixin Hu & Dawei Wang & Kaiyuan Pang & Guangxing Xu & Jinhong Guo, 2015. "The effect of emotion and time pressure on risk decision-making," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 637-650, May.
    19. Fudenberg, Drew & Levine, David K. & Maniadis, Zacharias, 2014. "An approximate dual-self model and paradoxes of choice under risk," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 55-67.
    20. Herweg, Fabian, 2013. "The expectation-based loss-averse newsvendor," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 429-432.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:8:y:2024:i:3:p:72-:d:1436346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.