IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v10y2021i2p31-d542798.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Promise of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (and Brexit) on the Implementation of Economic and Social Rights among EU Member States

Author

Listed:
  • Nirmala Pillay

    (Leeds Law School, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK)

Abstract

This article examines the extent to which the inclusion of the European Union (EU) Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Treaty of Lisbon, which gives legal force to socio-economic rights as well as civil and political rights, will succeed in helping EU member states meet international treaty obligations to implement socio-economic rights. Will the EU’s renewed commitment to developing the social sphere, post-Brexit, be more successful and will British citizens lose out on so-cio-economic rights in the long term if the EU succeeds in creating a better social or public dimension? Member states of the EU that have ratified the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) have obligations to progressively realise economic, social and cultural (ESC) rights. Progress on this has been slow and potentially made more difficult by the economic direction adopted by the EU since the 1980s. Although the EU, from the beginning, saw itself as a “social market” it struggled to embed the “social” to the same extent that it embedded the “market”. Critics argue that the economic policies of the EU and key judgements of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) successfully dis-embedded the market from its social context. Additionally, the regulatory regime of the EU developed in a direction that limited the capacity of nation states to ameliorate the consequences of market-led policies for the least advantaged. However, the Charter of Rights, which places socio-economic rights on an equal footing with civil and political rights, is a novel and bold initiative. It has stimulated debate on whether the Charter could rebalance the EU’s economic agenda by paying attention to the social consequences of predominantly market-led policies. This paper examines the potential impact of the EU Charter, in the context of member states international human rights obligations, to create an environment where member states of the EU have fewer obstacles to the “progressive realization” of ESC rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Nirmala Pillay, 2021. "The Promise of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (and Brexit) on the Implementation of Economic and Social Rights among EU Member States," Laws, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:31-:d:542798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/10/2/31/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/10/2/31/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Cayla, 2019. "The Rise of Populist Movements in Europe: A Response to European Ordoliberalism?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 355-362, April.
    2. Teague, Paul & Grahl, John, 1991. "The European Community Social Charter and Labour Market Regulation," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 207-232, April.
    3. Streeck, Wolfgang, 2011. "The crisis in context democratic capitalism and its contradictions," MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/15, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Cayla, 2021. "Le « vivre-ensemble » face au projet néolibéral," Post-Print hal-02961194, HAL.
    2. Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos, 2015. "After the demise of neoliberalism but not of conservatism, a third developmentalism?," Textos para discussão 394, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
    3. Ulrich Mückenberger, 2016. "Citizenship at work. A guiding principle for social and trade union policy," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(1), pages 25-44, February.
    4. Regan, Aidan., 2013. "The impact of the eurozone crisis on Irish social partnership : a political economy analysis," ILO Working Papers 994805953402676, International Labour Organization.
    5. Maxence Follot, 2024. "The impact of populism on central bank communication: Analyzing theoretical developments and the case of Hungary," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 21(1), pages 65-95, June.
    6. Jeffrey Sommers & Charles Woolfson & Arunas Juska, 2014. "Austerity as a global prescription and lessons from the neoliberal Baltic experiment," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 25(3), pages 397-416, September.
    7. Koelble, Thomas A., 2018. "Globalization and governmentality in the post-colony: South Africa under Jacob Zuma," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Democracy and Democratization SP V 2018-103, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Stephen Bell & Michael Keating, 2019. "Low Wage Growth: Why It Matters and How to Fix It," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 52(4), pages 377-392, December.
    9. repec:ilo:ilowps:480595 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Wolfgang Streeck & Sigurt Vitols, 1995. "The European Community: Between Mandatory Consultation and Voluntary Information," NBER Chapters, in: Works Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations, pages 243-282, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. John Grahl & Paul League, 1992. "Integration Theory and European Labour Markets," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 30(4), pages 515-527, December.
    12. Dejene Mamo Bekana, 2021. "Innovation and Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: Why Institutions Matter? An Empirical Study Aross 37 Countries," Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, , vol. 20(2), pages 161-200, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:31-:d:542798. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.