IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p473-d1599039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Options for Forest Sector Participation in International Carbon Markets: Unlocking the Carbon Market Potential of Australia’s Forest Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Shaun Suitor

    (School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 37, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia)

  • David Hadley

    (UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia)

  • Fabiano Ximenes

    (New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia)

Abstract

Carbon markets have emerged as a central component of international climate change policies. Within these markets, forest carbon offset projects have become a key nature-based solution due to their low cost, large scale, and co-benefits. However, despite Australia’s vast forest estate, forest sector-specific offsets remain nascent in the Australian Carbon Market, the ACCU Scheme. Only 3.27% of Australian Carbon Credit Units have been issued to forest sector projects. This limited participation can be attributed to several constraints within the ACCU Scheme, principally the limited number of methods available for the forest sector to engage in. As a result, less than 1% of Australia’s current forest estate, both plantation and native forests, is considered eligible to participate in the ACCU Scheme. This limited eligibility is further compounded by the complexity and cost of participation, which act as significant barriers for forest projects within the ACCU Scheme. This paper explores the potential to expand forest sector involvement in the Australian carbon market through a comprehensive literature review of forest sector involvement in international carbon markets. The review found extensive participation by the forest sector in international carbon markets, with various methods available across 20 markets, including the largest voluntary and compliance markets. These methods cover plantation forests, native forests, the bioeconomy, and the built environment. Key results indicate that revising existing methods, developing new ones through the ACCU Scheme’s proponent-led method development process, and increasing participation in international voluntary methods could significantly expand the types of forest sector projects contributing to emissions reductions through carbon markets. Broader conclusions suggest that by embracing lessons from international practises and addressing current methodological constraints, Australia can realise this potential. Doing so would not only bolster the nation’s climate change mitigation efforts, but also unlock the co-benefits of biodiversity, water quality, soil productivity, and ecosystem resilience, ultimately contributing to a sustainable and resilient bioeconomy.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaun Suitor & David Hadley & Fabiano Ximenes, 2025. "Options for Forest Sector Participation in International Carbon Markets: Unlocking the Carbon Market Potential of Australia’s Forest Sector," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:473-:d:1599039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/473/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/473/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, "undated". "State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2023," World Bank Publications - Reports 39796, The World Bank Group.
    2. World Bank, "undated". "State and Trends of Carbon Pricing," World Bank Publications - Reports 40700, The World Bank Group.
    3. Gan, Jianbang & McCarl, Bruce A., 2007. "Measuring transnational leakage of forest conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 423-432, December.
    4. Arent, Douglas & Arndt, Channing & Miller, Mackay & Tarp, Finn & Zinaman, Owen (ed.), 2017. "The Political Economy of Clean Energy Transitions," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198802242, Decembrie.
    5. Dong-Ho Lee & Dong-hwan Kim & Seong-il Kim, 2018. "Characteristics of forest carbon credit transactions in the voluntary carbon market," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 235-245, February.
    6. Lars H. Gulbrandsen & Jørgen Wettestad & David G. Victor & Arild Underdal, 2019. "The political roots of divergence in carbon market design: implications for linking," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 427-438, April.
    7. Kim, Sei Jin & Baker, Justin S. & Sohngen, Brent L. & Shell, Michael, 2018. "Cumulative global forest carbon implications of regional bioenergy expansion policies," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 198-219.
    8. Jang-Hwan Jo & Taewoo Roh & Jongmin Hwang & Kyeong-hak Lee & Changbae Lee, 2020. "Factors and Paths Affecting Payment for Forest Ecosystem Service: Evidence from Voluntary Forest Carbon Market in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Liqing Peng & Timothy D. Searchinger & Jessica Zionts & Richard Waite, 2023. "The carbon costs of global wood harvests," Nature, Nature, vol. 620(7972), pages 110-115, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard Bullock & Martha Lawrence & Joanna Moody, 2023. "Unlocking Green Logistics for Development," World Bank Publications - Reports 40529, The World Bank Group.
    2. Zhao, Yu & Gao, Gege & Zhang, Jixiang & Yu, Miao, 2024. "Impact of carbon tax on green building development: An evolutionary game analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Li, Lili & Zhang, Daowei, 2024. "Forest carbon offset protocols in compliance carbon markets," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Paolo Agnolucci & Defne Gencer & Dirk Heine, 2024. "Total Carbon Pricing for Energy Consumption," World Bank Publications - Reports 41537, The World Bank Group.
    5. Timilsina,Govinda R. & Sebsibie,Samuel, 2024. "Economic and Distributional Impacts of Selected Carbon Pricing Policies for the Arab Republic of Egypt," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10791, The World Bank.
    6. Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP), 2024. "Scaling Up Renewables in Europe and Central Asia," World Bank Publications - Reports 42578, The World Bank Group.
    7. Andritzky Jochen & Hesse Nils, 2025. "Should Non-EU Countries Be Able to Join the EU Emissions Trading System?," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Sciendo, vol. 60(1), pages 49-54.
    8. El Hana, Nadr & Kondrateva, Galina & Martin, Silvia, 2024. "Emission-smart advertising: Balancing performance with CO2 emissions in digital advertising," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    9. Baker, J.S. & Wade, C.M. & Sohngen, B.L. & Ohrel, S. & Fawcett, A.A., 2019. "Potential complementarity between forest carbon sequestration incentives and biomass energy expansion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 391-401.
    10. Chung, Yessica C.Y. & Kunene, Noxolo & Chang, Hung-Hao, 2024. "Renewable energy certificates and firm value: Empirical evidence in Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Monica Santillan Vera & Lilia Garcia Manrique & Isabel Rodriguez Pena & Angel de la Vega Navarro, 2021. "Drivers of Electricity GHG Emissions and the Role of Natural Gas in Mexican Energy Transition," Working Paper Series 1021, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    12. Jia, Junsheng & He, Xiaoyu & Zhu, Taiyu & Zhang, Eryu, 2023. "Does green finance reform promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    13. Delacote, Philippe & Robinson, Elizabeth J.Z. & Roussel, Sébastien, 2016. "Deforestation, leakage and avoided deforestation policies: A spatial analysis," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 192-210.
    14. Jennifer M. Alix-Garcia & Elizabeth N. Shapiro & Katharine R. E. Sims, 2012. "Forest Conservation and Slippage: Evidence from Mexico’s National Payments for Ecosystem Services Program," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 88(4), pages 613-638.
    15. Michaela Perunová & Jarmila Zimmermannová & Tereza Schovánková, 2024. "Forest carbon and a regional perspective on the effectiveness of financial instruments within the forest bioeconomy," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(6), pages 317-334.
    16. Knut Rosendahl & Jon Strand, 2015. "Emissions Trading with Offset Markets and Free Quota Allocations," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 61(2), pages 243-271, June.
    17. Nelson Villoria & Rachael Garrett & Florian Gollnow & Kimberly Carlson, 2022. "Leakage does not fully offset soy supply-chain efforts to reduce deforestation in Brazil," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    18. Christine Schleupner & Uwe A. Schneider, 2008. "Evaluation of European wetland restoration potentials by considering economic costs under different policy options," Working Papers FNU-158, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Jul 2008.
    19. Li, Lingchao & Liu, Jinlong & Long, Hexing & de Jong, Wil & Youn, Yeo-Chang, 2017. "Economic globalization, trade and forest transition-the case of nine Asian countries," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 7-13.
    20. Tony Addison, 2018. "Climate change and the extractives sector," WIDER Working Paper Series 84, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:473-:d:1599039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.