IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sus/susewp/1021.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Drivers of Electricity GHG Emissions and the Role of Natural Gas in Mexican Energy Transition

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Santillan Vera

    (Facultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad Anáhuac México)

  • Lilia Garcia Manrique

    (Department of Economics, University of Sussex, Falmer, United Kingdom)

  • Isabel Rodriguez Pena

    (Facultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad Anáhuac México)

  • Angel de la Vega Navarro

    (Facultad de Economía, UNAM)

Abstract

In the last three decades, the high growth of natural gas as an energy source of Mexican electricity production was the most significant change in the sector. Natural gas went from being the source for 7% of electricity in 1990 to 62.3% in 2020. A co-dependence of electricity and natural gas systems has been established. Is this fact consistent with the objective of decarbonizing the electricity sector? We study this question through a decomposition analysis of electricity GHG emissions in Mexico between 1990 and 2015. We use a Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) to quantify the changes of electricity GHG emissions related to activity, carbon coefficient, structure, and energy intensity effects. Activity effect was the most significant driver of GHG emissions growth, while structure and energy intensity effects contributed to limiting that growth. Although natural gas is the cleanest fossil fuel and its share in the electricity mix increased significantly, the effect of the carbon coefficient effect has shown a limited contribution to mitigating GHG emissions. From these results, we raise concerns about the role of natural gas, which could lead to carbon lock-in and stranded assets in the long term. To avoid this, an energy policy aiming towards a low-carbon energy system should consider the composition “natural gas + renewable energies + energy efficiency†.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Santillan Vera & Lilia Garcia Manrique & Isabel Rodriguez Pena & Angel de la Vega Navarro, 2021. "Drivers of Electricity GHG Emissions and the Role of Natural Gas in Mexican Energy Transition," Working Paper Series 1021, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    • Handle: RePEc:sus:susewp:1021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=wps-10-2021.pdf&site=18
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberto F. Aguilera & Roberto Aguilera, 2020. "Revisiting the role of natural gas as a transition fuel," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 33(1), pages 73-80, July.
    2. Arent, Douglas & Arndt, Channing & Miller, Mackay & Tarp, Finn & Zinaman, Owen (ed.), 2017. "The Political Economy of Clean Energy Transitions," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198802242.
    3. Unruh, Gregory C., 2000. "Understanding carbon lock-in," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 817-830, October.
    4. Stephenson, Eleanor & Doukas, Alexander & Shaw, Karena, 2012. "“Greenwashing gas: Might a ‘transition fuel’ label legitimize carbon-intensive natural gas development?”," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 452-459.
    5. Goh, Tian & Ang, B.W. & Xu, X.Y., 2018. "Quantifying drivers of CO2 emissions from electricity generation – Current practices and future extensions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1191-1204.
    6. De Oliveira-De Jesus, Paulo M., 2019. "Effect of generation capacity factors on carbon emission intensity of electricity of Latin America & the Caribbean, a temporal IDA-LMDI analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 516-526.
    7. Huntington, Hillard G. & Bhargava, Abha & Daniels, David & Weyant, John P. & Avraam, Charalampos & Bistline, John & Edmonds, James A. & Giarola, Sara & Hawkes, Adam & Hansen, Matthew & Johnston, Peter, 2020. "Key findings from the core North American scenarios in the EMF34 intermodel comparison," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    8. Paul L. Joskow, 2013. "Natural Gas: From Shortages to Abundance in the United States," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(3), pages 338-343, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Santillán Vera, Mónica & García Manrique, Lilia & Rodríguez Peña, Isabel & De La Vega Navarro, Angel, 2023. "Drivers of electricity GHG emissions and the role of natural gas in mexican energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Gürsan, C. & de Gooyert, V., 2021. "The systemic impact of a transition fuel: Does natural gas help or hinder the energy transition?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. Harmsen, Robert & Crijns-Graus, Wina, 2021. "Unhiding the role of CHP in power & heat sector decomposition analyses," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Shiping Ma & Qianqian Liu & Wenzhong Zhang, 2022. "Examining the Effects of Installed Capacity Mix and Capacity Factor on Aggregate Carbon Intensity for Electricity Generation in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Mine Isik & P. Ozge Kaplan, 2020. "Understanding Technology, Fuel, Market and Policy Drivers for New York State’s Power Sector Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    6. O'Shaughnessy, Eric, 2022. "How policy has shaped the emerging solar photovoltaic installation industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    7. Sexton, Steven & Eyer, Jonathan, 2016. "Leveling the playing field of transportation fuels: Accounting for indirect emissions of natural gas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 21-31.
    8. Wang, Yaxian & Zhao, Zhenli & Wang, Wenju & Streimikiene, Dalia & Balezentis, Tomas, 2023. "Interplay of multiple factors behind decarbonisation of thermal electricity generation: A novel decomposition model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    9. Foxon, T. J. & Gross, R. & Chase, A. & Howes, J. & Arnall, A. & Anderson, D., 2005. "UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(16), pages 2123-2137, November.
    10. Curci, Ylenia & Mongeau Ospina, Christian A., 2016. "Investigating biofuels through network analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 60-72.
    11. Zhang, Hui & Cao, Libin & Zhang, Bing, 2017. "Emissions trading and technology adoption: An adaptive agent-based analysis of thermal power plants in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 23-32.
    12. Hellsmark, Hans & Hansen, Teis, 2020. "A new dawn for (oil) incumbents within the bioeconomy? Trade-offs and lessons for policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    13. Marzieh Ronaghi & Michael Reed & Sayed Saghaian, 2020. "The impact of economic factors and governance on greenhouse gas emission," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 22(2), pages 153-172, April.
    14. Marletto, Gerardo, 2011. "Structure, agency and change in the car regime. A review of the literature," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 47, pages 71-88.
    15. Valeria Costantini & Francesco Crespi, 2013. "Public policies for a sustainable energy sector: regulation, diversity and fostering of innovation," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 401-429, April.
    16. Aalbers, Rob & Shestalova, Victoria & Kocsis, Viktória, 2013. "Innovation policy for directing technical change in the power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1240-1250.
    17. Xu, Wenyan & Mo, Wenting, 2024. "Institutional unlocking or technological unlocking? The logic of carbon unlocking in the new energy vehicle industry in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    18. Karlsson, Rasmus, 2012. "Carbon lock-in, rebound effects and China at the limits of statism," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 939-945.
    19. Nill, Jan & Kemp, Ren, 2009. "Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 668-680, May.
    20. Wüstenhagen, Rolf & Menichetti, Emanuela, 2012. "Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-10.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sus:susewp:1021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: University of Sussex Business School Communications Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsusuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.