IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i9p1388-d1466515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overview of Traditional and Contemporary Industrial Production Technologies for Biochar along with Quality Standardization Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Mátyás Köves

    (Doctoral School of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 1118 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Viktor Madár

    (Doctoral School of Mechanical Engineering, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary)

  • Marianna Ringer

    (Geographical Institute, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, 1118 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Tamás Kocsis

    (Institute of Food Science and Technology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 1118 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Biochar refers to any material that has transformed into an amorphous, graphite-like structure as a result of the thermochemical conversion of organic materials. Incorporating biochar into soil contributes to mitigating the effects of climate change through the sequestration and storage of carbon. There are numerous methods for producing biochar, including pyrolysis, gasification, hydrothermal carbonization, and flash carbonization. The choice of technology largely depends on the intended use of the biochar and the type of biomass available. However, traditional production processes often face environmental challenges, especially in developing countries. This study introduces several traditional charcoal-burning techniques used around the world and provides an overview of modern industrial biochar production methods. International organizations have developed standards for determining the quality parameters of biochar and have proposed guidelines for its application in soil. According to the available literature, biochar presents a promising opportunity for advancing sustainable agriculture and mitigating climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Mátyás Köves & Viktor Madár & Marianna Ringer & Tamás Kocsis, 2024. "Overview of Traditional and Contemporary Industrial Production Technologies for Biochar along with Quality Standardization Methods," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1388-:d:1466515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1388/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1388/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Kuo, Po-Chih, 2011. "Isothermal torrefaction kinetics of hemicellulose, cellulose, lignin and xylan using thermogravimetric analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6451-6460.
    2. Afolabi, Oluwasola O.D. & Sohail, M. & Cheng, Yu-Ling, 2020. "Optimisation and characterisation of hydrochar production from spent coffee grounds by hydrothermal carbonisation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1380-1391.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. El may, Yassine & Jeguirim, Mejdi & Dorge, Sophie & Trouvé, Gwenaelle & Said, Rachid, 2012. "Study on the thermal behavior of different date palm residues: Characterization and devolatilization kinetics under inert and oxidative atmospheres," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 702-709.
    2. Lu, Ke-Miao & Lee, Wen-Jhy & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Lin, Ta-Chang, 2013. "Thermogravimetric analysis and kinetics of co-pyrolysis of raw/torrefied wood and coal blends," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 57-65.
    3. Batidzirai, B. & Mignot, A.P.R. & Schakel, W.B. & Junginger, H.M. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2013. "Biomass torrefaction technology: Techno-economic status and future prospects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 196-214.
    4. Sooraj Kumar & Suhail Ahmed Soomro & Khanji Harijan & Mohammad Aslam Uqaili & Laveet Kumar, 2023. "Advancements of Biochar-Based Catalyst for Improved Production of Biodiesel: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Śliz, Maciej & Wilk, Małgorzata, 2020. "A comprehensive investigation of hydrothermal carbonization: Energy potential of hydrochar derived from Virginia mallow," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 942-950.
    6. Wenjia Jin & Kaushlendra Singh & John Zondlo, 2013. "Pyrolysis Kinetics of Physical Components of Wood and Wood-Polymers Using Isoconversion Method," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Ge, Shengbo & Yek, Peter Nai Yuh & Cheng, Yoke Wang & Xia, Changlei & Wan Mahari, Wan Adibah & Liew, Rock Keey & Peng, Wanxi & Yuan, Tong-Qi & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Sonne, Christia, 2021. "Progress in microwave pyrolysis conversion of agricultural waste to value-added biofuels: A batch to continuous approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. Wu, Keng-Tung & Tsai, Chia-Ju & Chen, Chih-Shen & Chen, Hsiao-Wei, 2012. "The characteristics of torrefied microalgae," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 52-57.
    9. Leslie Lara-Ramos & Ana Cervera-Mata & Jesús Fernández-Bayo & Miguel Navarro-Alarcón & Gabriel Delgado & Alejandro Fernández-Arteaga, 2023. "Hydrochars Derived from Spent Coffee Grounds as Zn Bio-Chelates for Agronomic Biofortification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-13, July.
    10. Francisco Rodríguez & Yuby Cruz & Idoia Estiati & Juan F. Saldarriaga, 2019. "Kinetic Study of Corn and Sugarcane Waste Oxidative Pyrolysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Meng, Xiaoxiao & Sun, Rui & Ismail, Tamer M. & Zhou, Wei & Ren, Xiaohan & Zhang, Ruihan, 2018. "Parametric studies on corn straw combustion characteristics in a fixed bed: Ash and moisture content," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 192-203.
    12. Zhou, Limin & Zou, Hongbin & Wang, Yun & Le, Zhanggao & Liu, Zhirong & Adesina, Adesoji A., 2017. "Effect of potassium on thermogravimetric behavior and co-pyrolytic kinetics of wood biomass and low density polyethylene," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PA), pages 134-141.
    13. Collazo, Joaquín & Pazó, José Antonio & Granada, Enrique & Saavedra, Ángeles & Eguía, Pablo, 2012. "Determination of the specific heat of biomass materials and the combustion energy of coke by DSC analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 746-752.
    14. Siddiqi, Hammad & Kumari, Usha & Biswas, Subrata & Mishra, Asmita & Meikap, B.C., 2020. "A synergistic study of reaction kinetics and heat transfer with multi-component modelling approach for the pyrolysis of biomass waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    15. Granados, D.A. & Velásquez, H.I. & Chejne, F., 2014. "Energetic and exergetic evaluation of residual biomass in a torrefaction process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 181-189.
    16. Marcin Sajdak & Roksana Muzyka & Grzegorz Gałko & Ewelina Ksepko & Monika Zajemska & Szymon Sobek & Dariusz Tercki, 2022. "Actual Trends in the Usability of Biochar as a High-Value Product of Biomass Obtained through Pyrolysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-30, December.
    17. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Peng, Jianghong & Bi, Xiaotao T., 2015. "A state-of-the-art review of biomass torrefaction, densification and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 847-866.
    18. Kim, Heeyoon & Yu, Seunghan & Ra, Howon & Yoon, Sungmin & Ryu, Changkook, 2023. "Prediction of pyrolysis kinetics for torrefied biomass based on raw biomass properties and torrefaction severity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    19. Joanna Mikusińska & Monika Kuźnia & Klaudia Czerwińska & Małgorzata Wilk, 2023. "Hydrothermal Carbonization of Digestate Produced in the Biogas Production Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Huang, Lei & Chen, Yucheng & Liu, Geng & Li, Shengnan & Liu, Yun & Gao, Xu, 2015. "Non-isothermal pyrolysis characteristics of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) using thermogravimetric analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 31-40.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1388-:d:1466515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.