IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i9p1365-d1464295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green and Low Carbon Development Performance in Farmland Use Regulation: A Case Study of Liyang City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yaoben Lin

    (School of Law and Public Affairs, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
    Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China)

  • Xuewen Wang

    (School of Law and Public Affairs, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China)

  • Guangyu Li

    (School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Wei Shen

    (School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

Farmland use regulation strictly regulates the conversion of agricultural land for other agricultural purposes and the construction of agricultural facilities, thereby optimizing the land use pattern in rural areas. However, different measures and intensities of farmland use regulation can affect the overall performance of green and low-carbon development in rural areas. This study utilizes system dynamics modeling and simulation to conduct a case study based on current land use data from 10 towns in Liyang City, China. The empirical results indicate the following: (1) Based on comprehensive measurements of green and low carbon development performance, Liyang City exhibits a pattern of higher indices in the south and lower indices in the north. Towns such as Tianmu Lake, Daibu, and Shezhu show relatively high average comprehensive indices of 0.31, 0.30, and 0.28, significantly higher than other towns. (2) Simulation of farmland use regulation’s impact on green and low carbon development performance reveals that Scenario One, involving additional construction land occupying farmland, achieves a comprehensive index of only 0.23, significantly lower than the other scenarios. (3) Based on calculations and field surveys, Liyang City’s villages are categorized into four types, with the largest number being industry-integrated villages (94 villages). Accordingly, policies for farmland use regulation are designed for different village types. Therefore, future farmland use regulation should be tailored with differentiated institutional designs according to the development needs of different villages. This study’s findings provide insights into green and low-carbon development in rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaoben Lin & Xuewen Wang & Guangyu Li & Wei Shen, 2024. "Green and Low Carbon Development Performance in Farmland Use Regulation: A Case Study of Liyang City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1365-:d:1464295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1365/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1365/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang Guo & Meiling Cui & Zhigang Xu, 2023. "Performance Environment, Contract Binding, and the Contract Structure of the Farmland Transfer Market," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Onur Boyabatlı & Javad Nasiry & Yangfang (Helen) Zhou, 2019. "Crop Planning in Sustainable Agriculture: Dynamic Farmland Allocation in the Presence of Crop Rotation Benefits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2060-2076, May.
    3. Qie, Lu & Pu, Lijie & Tang, Pengfei & Liu, Rongjuan & Huang, Sihua & Xu, Fei & Zhong, Taiyang, 2023. "Gains and losses of farmland associated with farmland protection policy and urbanization in China: An integrated perspective based on goal orientation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    4. Bina Agarwal & Malvika Mahesh, 2023. "Does the Landowner’s Gender Affect Self-Cultivation and Farm Productivity? An Analysis for India," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(5), pages 758-777, May.
    5. Martinson Ankrah Twumasi & Yuansheng Jiang & Evans B. Ntiamoah & Selorm Akaba & Kwabena N. Darfor & Linda K. Boateng, 2022. "Access to credit and farmland abandonment nexus: The case of rural Ghana," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 46(1), pages 3-20, February.
    6. Di Foggia, Giacomo & Beccarello, Massimo, 2024. "European roadmaps to achieving 2030 renewable energy targets," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tarun Jain & Jishnu Hazra & T. C. E. Cheng, 2023. "Analysis of upstream pricing regulation and contract structure in an agriculture supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(1), pages 85-122, January.
    2. Ibirénoyé Romaric Sodjahin & Fabienne Femenia & Obafemi Philippe Koutchade & A. Carpentier, 2022. "On the economic value of the agronomic effects of crop diversification for farmers: estimation based on farm cost accounting data [Valeur économique des effets agronomiques de la diversification de," Working Papers hal-03639951, HAL.
    3. Otgonpurev Nergui & Soojin Park & Kang-wook Cho, 2024. "Comparative Policy Analysis of Renewable Energy Expansion in Mongolia and Other Relevant Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Víctor M. Albornoz & Gabriel E. Zamora, 2021. "Decomposition-based heuristic for the zoning and crop planning problem with adjacency constraints," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(1), pages 248-265, April.
    5. Zhongshun Gong & Ye Yuan & Lu Qie & Sihua Huang & Xuefeng Xie & Rui Zhong & Lijie Pu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Differentiation and Coupling Coordination Relationship of the Production–Living–Ecological Function at County Scale: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Liu, Jingping & Jin, Xiaobin & Song, Jiapeng & Zhu, Wenjie & Zhou, Yinkang, 2024. "Semi-natural habitats: A comparative research between the European Union and China in agricultural landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Agarwal, Bina & Naik, Shruthi, 2024. "Do courts grant women their inheritance shares? An analysis of case law in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    8. Deininger,Klaus W. & Ali,Daniel Ayalew & Kussul,Nataliia & Lavreniuk,Mykola & Nivievskyi,Oleg, 2020. "Using Machine Learning to Assess Yield Impacts of Crop Rotation : Combining Satellite and Statistical Data for Ukraine," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9306, The World Bank.
    9. Ming Hu & Yan Liu & Wenbin Wang, 2019. "Socially Beneficial Rationality: The Value of Strategic Farmers, Social Entrepreneurs, and For-Profit Firms in Crop Planting Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(8), pages 3654-3672, August.
    10. Punlork Men & Lyda Hok & Panchit Seeniang & B. Jan Middendorf & Rapee Dokmaithes, 2024. "Identifying Credit Accessibility Mechanisms for Conservation Agriculture Farmers in Cambodia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, June.
    11. Nouira, Imen & Hammami, Ramzi & Fernandez Arias, Alina & Gondran, Natacha & Frein, Yannick, 2022. "Olive oil supply chain design with organic and conventional market segments and consumers’ preference to local products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    12. Wei Zhang & Long Gao & Mohammad Zolghadr & Dawei Jian & Mohsen ElHafsi, 2023. "Dynamic incentives for sustainable contract farming," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(7), pages 2049-2067, July.
    13. Guthrie, Graeme, 2024. "Farm debt and the over-exploitation of natural capital," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    14. Xiaolong Guo & Lihong Cheng & Yugang Yu, 2022. "Government subsidy policy for green and efficient raw materials considering farmer heterogeneity," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(11), pages 4095-4112, November.
    15. Jie Liu & Jizhe Zhou & Qin He, 2024. "Impact of China’s Permanent Basic Farmland Protection Redline and Ecological Protection Redline on Water Conservation in the Loess Gully Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Durai Sundaramoorthi & Lingxiu Dong, 2024. "Machine learning and optimization based decision-support tool for seed variety selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(1), pages 5-39, October.
    17. Nematollahi, Mohammadreza & Tajbakhsh, Alireza & Mosadegh Sedghy, Bahareh, 2021. "The reflection of competition and coordination on organic agribusiness supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    18. Duygu Akkaya & Kostas Bimpikis & Hau Lee, 2021. "Government Interventions to Promote Agricultural Innovation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 437-452, March.
    19. Ying Li & Xu Han & Bingbing Zhou & Ligang Lv & Yeting Fan, 2023. "Farmland Dynamics and Its Grain Production Efficiency and Ecological Security in China’s Major Grain-Producing Regions between 2000 and 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Qian, Xiaoyan, 2021. "Production planning and equity investment decisions in agriculture with closed membership cooperatives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 684-699.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1365-:d:1464295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.