IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i8p1237-d1452575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Protection of Natural and Cultural Landscapes through Community-Based Tourism: The Case of the Indigenous Kamoro Tribe in West Papua, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Timika Aryani Anindhita

    (Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, 209 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea)

  • Seweryn Zielinski

    (Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, 209 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea)

  • Celene B. Milanes

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad del Magdalena, Carrera 32 #22-08, Santa Marta 470004, Colombia)

  • Young-joo Ahn

    (Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, 209 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Community-based tourism (CBT) aims to offer responsible travel to natural areas, conserving the environment, sustaining local communities’ well-being, and promoting environmental and cultural education. The long-term sustainability of CBT depends on its ability to enhance local livelihoods while protecting natural landscapes. For the Kamoro indigenous tribe in Papua, Indonesia, CBT offers a way to engage with the capitalist world on their own terms while preserving their customs, traditions, and ecocentric worldviews, and sharing them with tourists interested in their culture. However, as evidenced by many failed CBT initiatives, it is not always a desirable or viable path for development due to numerous barriers faced by communities and the potential negative impacts of tourism. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the Kamoro people’s attitudes towards tourism, the barriers to engaging in tourism, and their concerns about its impacts. Semi-structured and in-depth interviews were conducted with community members and local organizations. The results show that although local people view tourism as a viable economic alternative, they face significant challenges, including a lack of trained human resources, infrastructure, financial support, tourism knowledge, government backing, and cooperation among local stakeholders, among others. While tourism development does not always guarantee the protection of natural and cultural landscapes, a community-led initiative supported by the government can serve as a barrier against the engagement of less sustainable industries controlled by external agents, which could have far more serious negative consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Timika Aryani Anindhita & Seweryn Zielinski & Celene B. Milanes & Young-joo Ahn, 2024. "The Protection of Natural and Cultural Landscapes through Community-Based Tourism: The Case of the Indigenous Kamoro Tribe in West Papua, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1237-:d:1452575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1237/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1237/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghazala Mansuri, 2004. "Community-Based and -Driven Development: A Critical Review," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 19(1), pages 1-39.
    2. Susan Snyman, 2013. "Household spending patterns and flow of ecotourism income into communities around Liwonde National Park, Malawi," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4-5), pages 640-658, December.
    3. Seweryn Zielinski & Yoonjeong Jeong & Seong-il Kim & Celene B. Milanés, 2020. "Why Community-Based Tourism and Rural Tourism in Developing and Developed Nations are Treated Differently? A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Renaud Lapeyre, 2010. "Community-based tourism as a sustainable solution to maximise impacts locally? The Tsiseb Conservancy case, Namibia," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 757-772.
    5. Seweryn Zielinski & Seong-il Kim & Camilo Botero & Andrea Yanes, 2020. "Factors that facilitate and inhibit community-based tourism initiatives in developing countries," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 723-739, March.
    6. Karin Mahony & Jurgens Van Zyl, 2002. "The impacts of tourism investment on rural communities: Three case studies in South Africa," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 83-103.
    7. Rachel Dodds & Alisha Ali & Kelly Galaski, 2018. "Mobilizing knowledge: determining key elements for success and pitfalls in developing community-based tourism," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(13), pages 1547-1568, September.
    8. Marco Scholtz & Elmarie Slabbert, 2018. "A remodelled approach to measuring the social impact of tourism in a developing country," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 743-759, November.
    9. Sunjoo Park & Seweryn Zielinski & Yoonjeong Jeong & Seong-il Kim, 2020. "Factors Affecting Residents’ Support for Protected Area Designation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suyoun Kim & Yeong Hye Yoon & Jin-young Kim & Seul Ki Lee, 2024. "Community Implementation of the ASEAN Community-Based Tourism (CBT) Standard: An Executive Stakeholder Study on Lao PDR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Rid, Wolfgang & Ezeuduji, Ikechukwu O. & Pröbstl-Haider, Ulrike, 2014. "Segmentation by motivation for rural tourism activities in The Gambia," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 102-116.
    3. Rossana Santos & Rui Alexandre Castanho & Sérgio Lousada, 2019. "Return Migration and Tourism Sustainability in Portugal: Extracting Opportunities for Sustainable Common Planning in Southern Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Moslem Ghasemi & Mojtaba Javdan & Simin Tavalaee & Zohreh Charipour, 2024. "Local drivers in community-based tourism development: an analytical study of Bonlar village, Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 27057-27081, October.
    5. Eva Rachmawati & Joana Fountain & Michael Mackay, 2021. "Factors Influencing Economic Empowerment in Tourism Development," Economics and Finance in Indonesia, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, vol. 67, pages 223-234, Desember.
    6. Helen M. Haugh & Alka Talwar, 2016. "Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change: The Mediating Role of Empowerment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 643-658, February.
    7. Araujo, M. Caridad & Ferreira, Francisco H.G. & Lanjouw, Peter & Özler, Berk, 2008. "Local inequality and project choice: Theory and evidence from Ecuador," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(5-6), pages 1022-1046, June.
    8. Possenti, Silvia., 2012. "Rural development strategies as a path to decent work and reducing urban informal employment : the case of South Africa," ILO Working Papers 994790883402676, International Labour Organization.
    9. He, Lulu, 2019. "Identifying local needs for post-disaster recovery in Nepal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 52-62.
    10. Deininger, Klaus W. & Liu, Yanyan, 2008. "Economic and Social Impacts of Self-Help Groups in India," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6482, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Azam Chaudhry & Kate Vyborny, 2013. "Patronage in Rural Punjab: Evidence from a New Household Survey Dataset," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 18(Special E), pages 183-209, September.
    12. Arjan de Haan & Ward Warmerdam, 2012. "The politics of aid revisited: a review of evidence on state capacity and elite commitment," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-007-12, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    13. Zhan, Shaohua, 2015. "From Privatization to Deindustrialization: Implications of Chinese Rural Industry and the Ownership Debate Revisited," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 108-122.
    14. Stoeffler, Quentin & Mills, Bradford & del Ninno, Carlo, 2016. "Reaching the Poor: Cash Transfer Program Targeting in Cameroon," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 244-263.
    15. Saguin, Kidjie, 2018. "Why the poor do not benefit from community-driven development: Lessons from participatory budgeting," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 220-232.
    16. Catherine Ragasa & Cristina Alvarez-Mingote & Paul McNamara, 2024. "Bottom-Up Approaches and Decentralized Extension Structures for Improving Access to and Quality of Extension Services and Technology Adoption: Multi-level Analysis from Malawi," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(5), pages 1093-1146, October.
    17. Sebele, Lesego S., 2010. "Community-based tourism ventures, benefits and challenges: Khama Rhino Sanctuary Trust, Central District, Botswana," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 136-146.
    18. repec:asi:ajosrd:2012:p:39-45 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Rosiady Husaenie Sayuti, 2023. "Community Readiness in Implementing Sustainable Tourism on Small Islands: Evidence from Lombok, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Grillos, Tara, 2017. "Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-358.
    21. Deribe Assefa Aga & N. Noorderhaven & B. Vallejo, 2018. "Project beneficiary participation and behavioural intentions promoting project sustainability: The mediating role of psychological ownership," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(5), pages 527-546, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1237-:d:1452575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.