IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i6p826-d1411297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Chinese National Park Network Attention

Author

Listed:
  • Mingxin Chen

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230022, China)

  • Dong Dong

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230022, China
    Anhui Institute of Territory Spatial Planning and Ecology, Hefei 230022, China)

  • Fengquan Ji

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230022, China)

  • Yu Tai

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230022, China)

  • Nan Li

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230022, China)

  • Runyu Huang

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230022, China)

  • Tieqiao Xiao

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230022, China
    Anhui Institute of Territory Spatial Planning and Ecology, Hefei 230022, China
    Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Smart Countryside and Collaborative Governance, Hefei 230031, China)

Abstract

Due to advancements in information technology and growing eco-tourism demand, National Park Network Attention (NPNA) has emerged as a novel indicator of tourism appeal and ecological value recognition. Utilizing Baidu search index (accessed in 2023) data from 2013 to 2022, this study employs time series analysis, index analysis, and spatial statistics to measure and differentiate the spatial and temporal aspects of NPNA across 31 provinces, regions, and municipalities in mainland China, while systematically assessing the impact of various factors from both source and destination perspectives. Over the period of 2013 to 2022, NPNA has increased annually, peaking around holidays and during spring and autumn, demonstrating pronounced seasonality and precursor effects, while exhibiting volatility due to external events. Influenced by factors from both source and destination perspectives, the spatial distribution of NPNA displays a trend of being “high in the east and low in the west” and “high in the south and low in the north”, though regional disparities are diminishing. The population size in the source areas remains the dominant factor influencing NPNA, while the concept of national parks is not yet widely recognized. The destination’s tourism resource endowment, media publicity, accessibility, and level of informatization are significant influences. An effective integration of resources and marketing is essential for boosting NPNA. The findings provide valuable insights for optimizing the spatial layout of national parks, enhancing the tourism service system, innovating communication and promotional strategies, and improving national park governance effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingxin Chen & Dong Dong & Fengquan Ji & Yu Tai & Nan Li & Runyu Huang & Tieqiao Xiao, 2024. "A Study on Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Chinese National Park Network Attention," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:826-:d:1411297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/826/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/826/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bangwayo-Skeete, Prosper F. & Skeete, Ryan W., 2015. "Can Google data improve the forecasting performance of tourist arrivals? Mixed-data sampling approach," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 454-464.
    2. Zhenxing Jin & Chengxin Wang & Shangkun Yu & Shuai Zhang & Xiaoming Ding, 2022. "Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of urban shrinkage in the Yellow River Basin, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mamingi Nlandu, 2017. "Beauty and Ugliness of Aggregation over Time: A Survey," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 68(3), pages 205-227, December.
    2. Ling Tang & Chengyuan Zhang & Tingfei Li & Ling Li, 2021. "A novel BEMD-based method for forecasting tourist volume with search engine data," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(5), pages 1015-1038, August.
    3. Adriana Csikosova & Katarina Culkova & Erik Weiss & Maria Janoskova, 2021. "Evaluation of Market with Accommodation Facilities Considering Risk Influence—Case Study Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Fatemeh Binesh & Amanda Belarmino & Carola Raab, 2021. "A meta-analysis of hotel revenue management," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(5), pages 546-558, October.
    5. Monge, Manuel & Claudio-Quiroga, Gloria & Poza, Carlos, 2024. "Chinese economic behavior in times of covid-19. A new leading economic indicator based on Google trends," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    6. Eden Xiaoying Jiao & Jason Li Chen, 2019. "Tourism forecasting: A review of methodological developments over the last decade," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(3), pages 469-492, May.
    7. Doris Chenguang Wu & Shiteng Zhong & Richard T R Qiu & Ji Wu, 2022. "Are customer reviews just reviews? Hotel forecasting using sentiment analysis," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(3), pages 795-816, May.
    8. Liwen Ling & Dabin Zhang & Shanying Chen & Amin W. Mugera, 2020. "Can online search data improve the forecast accuracy of pork price in China?," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 671-686, July.
    9. Cebrián, Eduardo & Domenech, Josep, 2024. "Addressing Google Trends inconsistencies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    10. Fieger, Peter & Rice, John, 2016. "Modelling Chinese Inbound Tourism Arrivals into Christchurch," MPRA Paper 75468, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Carl Bonham & Peter Fuleky & James Jones & Ashley Hirashima, 2015. "Nowcasting Tourism Industry Performance Using High Frequency Covariates," Working Papers 2015-3, University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
    12. Fengzhi Sun & Zihan Li & Mingzhi Xu & Mingcan Han, 2024. "New Changes in Chinese Urban Tourism Pattern under the Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic: Based on Internet Attention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-22, July.
    13. Ruikuan Yao & Zhisheng Ma & Haitao Wu & Yifeng Xie, 2024. "Mechanism and Measurement of the Effects of Industrial Agglomeration on Agricultural Economic Resilience," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, February.
    14. Long Wen & Chang Liu & Haiyan Song, 2019. "Forecasting tourism demand using search query data: A hybrid modelling approach," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(3), pages 309-329, May.
    15. Guizzardi, Andrea & Pons, Flavio Maria Emanuele & Angelini, Giovanni & Ranieri, Ercolino, 2021. "Big data from dynamic pricing: A smart approach to tourism demand forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 1049-1060.
    16. Prest, Brian C., 2018. "Explanations for the 2014 oil price decline: Supply or demand?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 63-75.
    17. Blazquez, Desamparados & Domenech, Josep, 2018. "Big Data sources and methods for social and economic analyses," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 99-113.
    18. Han Liu & Yongjing Wang & Haiyan Song & Ying Liu, 2023. "Measuring tourism demand nowcasting performance using a monotonicity test," Tourism Economics, , vol. 29(5), pages 1302-1327, August.
    19. Hulya Bakirtas & Vildan Gulpinar Demirci, 2022. "Can Google Trends data provide information on consumer’s perception regarding hotel brands?," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 57-83, March.
    20. Guy P. Nason & Ben Powell & Duncan Elliott & Paul A. Smith, 2017. "Should we sample a time series more frequently?: decision support via multirate spectrum estimation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(2), pages 353-407, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:826-:d:1411297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.