IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i3p289-d1345903.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mechanism of Street Markets Fostering Supportive Communities in Old Urban Districts: A Case Study of Sham Shui Po, Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Yueyi Tan

    (School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China
    School of Architecture, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China)

  • Jusheng Song

    (School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Lei Yu

    (School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Yunxi Bai

    (School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Jianfeng Zhang

    (Anhui Jiangbei Meitu Information Technology Co., Ltd., Fuyang 236000, China)

  • Man-Ha (Sylvia) Chan

    (School of Architecture, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China)

  • Jeroen van Ameijde

    (School of Architecture, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China)

Abstract

In old urban districts with tenement buildings, street markets address the working class’s social and economic needs. They are pivotal in fostering supportive communities, in particular for low-income residents in sub-standard housing. However, their outdated overall environment impedes the delivery of adequate support to residents. Prior research on street markets has focused on those in the Americas and Europe, and has revealed the societal support values of these markets. However, studies on street markets in high-density cities like Hong Kong are lacking. This study introduces an evaluation framework to assess the impact of street markets on the development of supportive communities for Hong Kong’s sub-divided apartment residents. Employing the Pei Ho Street market in Sham Shui Po as a case study, an importance-performance analysis highlights critical but underperforming factors including public facilities, activity venues, commerce, and employment. Based on these findings, the study proposes four improvement strategies for the renewal of street markets in high-density communities, which could apply to other cities with similar high-density urban environments. It concludes that street markets in Hong Kong display unique spatial characteristics shaped by low-income lifestyles in a high-density urban environment, enriching daily social life and promoting sustainable community development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yueyi Tan & Jusheng Song & Lei Yu & Yunxi Bai & Jianfeng Zhang & Man-Ha (Sylvia) Chan & Jeroen van Ameijde, 2024. "The Mechanism of Street Markets Fostering Supportive Communities in Old Urban Districts: A Case Study of Sham Shui Po, Hong Kong," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:289-:d:1345903
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/3/289/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/3/289/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Oppio & M. Bottero & A. Arcidiacono, 2022. "Assessing urban quality: a proposal for a MCDA evaluation framework," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 1427-1444, May.
    2. Chung Yim Yiu, 2023. "The Impacts of Shopping Tourism on Retail Sales and Rents: Lessons from the COVID-19 Quasi-Experiment of Hong Kong," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Alfonso Morales & Steven Balkin & Joseph Persky, 1995. "The Value of Benefits of a Public Street Market: The Case of Maxwell Street," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 9(4), pages 304-320, November.
    4. Ana Louro & Nuno Marques da Costa & Eduarda Marques da Costa, 2021. "From Livable Communities to Livable Metropolis: Challenges for Urban Mobility in Lisbon Metropolitan Area (Portugal)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Stephanie Y. S. Cheung & Danyang Lei & Faye Y. F. Chan & Hendrik Tieben, 2022. "Public Space Usage and Well-Being: Participatory Action Research With Vulnerable Groups in Hyper-Dense Environments," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 75-89.
    6. Mandy Lau, 2020. "Community-based housing solutions in Hong Kong: how and why have they emerged?," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 290-301, April.
    7. Laurie Buys & Evonne Miller, 2012. "Residential satisfaction in inner urban higher-density Brisbane, Australia: role of dwelling design, neighbourhood and neighbours," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 319-338, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bo Kyong Seo & Dayoon Kim, 2024. "THE HOUSING‐WELFARE REGIME AND THIRD‐SECTOR HOUSING IN HONG KONG AND SOUTH KOREA: A Historical Institutionalist Perspective," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 442-462, May.
    2. Carolyn‐Dung Thi Thanh Tran & Brian Dollery, 2021. "All in the Mind: Citizen Satisfaction and Financial Performance in the Victorian Local Government System," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(1), pages 51-64, March.
    3. Jeffrey K. O'Hara & Nony Dutton & Nick Stavely, 2022. "The influence of farmers markets' characteristics on vendor sales," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(2), pages 295-311, April.
    4. Theresa Kotulla & Jon Martin Denstadli & Are Oust & Elisabeth Beusker, 2019. "What Does It Take to Make the Compact City Liveable for Wider Groups? Identifying Key Neighbourhood and Dwelling Features," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Hong Leng & Bingbing Han, 2022. "Effect of Environmental Planning on Elderly Individual Quality of Life in Severe Cold Regions: A Case Study in Northeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Francesco Sica & Francesco Tajani & Maria Rosaria Guarini & Rossana Ranieri, 2023. "A Sensitivity Index to Perform the Territorial Sustainability in Uncertain Decision-Making Conditions," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Meyer, Peter B. & Schwarze, Reimund, 2019. "Financing climate-resilient infrastructure: A political-economy framework," UFZ Discussion Papers 1/2019, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    8. Lynda Cheshire & Robin Fitzgerald & Yan Liu, 2019. "Neighbourhood change and neighbour complaints: How gentrification and densification influence the prevalence of problems between neighbours," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(6), pages 1093-1112, May.
    9. Karen Villanueva & Hannah Badland & Robert Tanton & Ilan Katz & Sally Brinkman & Ju-Lin Lee & Geoffrey Woolcock & Billie Giles-Corti & Sharon Goldfeld, 2019. "Local Housing Characteristics Associated with Early Childhood Development Outcomes in Australian Disadvantaged Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Pascucci, Stefano & Cicatiello, Clara & Franco, Silvio & Pancino, Barbara & Davide, Marino, 2011. "Back to the Future? Understanding Change in Food Habits of Farmers' Market Customers," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, November.
    11. Eziyi Ibem & Dolapo Amole, 2013. "Residential Satisfaction in Public Core Housing in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(1), pages 563-581, August.
    12. Kai Zhang & Dong Yan, 2023. "Exploring Indoor and Outdoor Residential Factors of High-Density Communities for Promoting the Housing Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Rasheed Osuolale Oladosu & Mohammed Abdulkadir & Mohammed Abdulkadir, 2023. "Contextual Reports on Residential Satisfaction Studies from Developing Countries: Review Highlights," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(5), pages 1765-1777, May.
    14. María Salomé Ochoa Rico & Arnaldo Vergara-Romero & José Fernando Romero Subia & Juan Antonio Jimber del Río, 2022. "Study of citizen satisfaction and loyalty in the urban area of Guayaquil: Perspective of the quality of public services applying structural equations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-27, February.
    15. Sandrine Gaymard & Jimmy Bordarie, 2015. "The Perception of the Ideal Neighborhood: A Preamble to Implementation of a “Street Use Code”," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 801-816, February.
    16. Emmanuel Bosompem Boadi & Shaojun Chen & Ebenezer Impriam Amponsah & Ruth Appiah, 2022. "Antecedents of Residential Satisfaction in Resettlement Housing in Ellembelle: A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-13, September.
    17. Alfonso Morales, 2021. "On Farmers Markets as Wicked Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-9, May.
    18. Ibrahim Mutambik, 2024. "The Sustainability of Smart Cities: Improving Evaluation by Combining MCDA and PROMETHEE," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, September.
    19. Dagmara Stangierska & Iwona Kowalczuk & Ksenia Juszczak-Szelągowska & Katarzyna Widera & Weronika Ferenc, 2022. "Urban Environment, Green Urban Areas, and Life Quality of Citizens—The Case of Warsaw," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, September.
    20. Hamersma, Marije & Tillema, Taede & Sussman, Joseph & Arts, Jos, 2014. "Residential satisfaction close to highways: The impact of accessibility, nuisances and highway adjustment projects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 106-121.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:289-:d:1345903. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.