IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i11p1781-d1509895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Assets Value Extraction and Integrated Utilization of Old Communities: Case of Central Guangzhou, China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyong Yin

    (School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yiming Tang

    (Guangzhou Urban Planning and Design Survey Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510060, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Lei Yuan

    (Guangzhou Urban Planning and Design Survey Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510060, China)

  • Yongjun Ai

    (Guangzhou Urban Planning and Design Survey Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510060, China)

  • Yan Tang

    (School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

Extracting the economic value by the integrated utilization of space in old communities is crucial for encouraging independent participation from enterprises and residents, reducing reliance on government leadership and fiscal investment. This study starts from the active perspective of spatial assets and constructs a value activation framework for old communities by balancing “endogenous demand” and “exogenous opportunities”. By enhancing the “economic value” through the “use value”, five methods for value extraction and overall project utilization paths are proposed, guided by a dynamic “cost-revenue” balance. Using multi-source data, we identify the spatial assets of 1096 old communities in central Guangzhou and apply a market comparison method for an economic value assessment. Additionally, this study offers recommendations on the timing and project portfolios for regeneration efforts, along with strategies for establishing a coordinating implementation entity and fund account. This research provides strategic insights for advancing the regeneration of old communities by tapping into their macro-level economic potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyong Yin & Yiming Tang & Lei Yuan & Yongjun Ai & Yan Tang, 2024. "Spatial Assets Value Extraction and Integrated Utilization of Old Communities: Case of Central Guangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1781-:d:1509895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1781/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1781/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zelin Zhang & Xiaomin Tang & Yun Wang, 2023. "Evaluation of the Intergenerational Equity of Public Open Space in Old Communities: A Case Study of Caoyang New Village in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Yueyi Tan & Jusheng Song & Lei Yu & Yunxi Bai & Jianfeng Zhang & Man-Ha (Sylvia) Chan & Jeroen van Ameijde, 2024. "The Mechanism of Street Markets Fostering Supportive Communities in Old Urban Districts: A Case Study of Sham Shui Po, Hong Kong," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Daniel V. Rainey & Kenneth L. Robinson & Ivye Allen & Ralph D. Christy, 2003. "Essential Forms of Capital for Sustainable Community Development," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(3), pages 708-715.
    4. Yihua Sun & Shixian Luo, 2024. "A Study on the Current Situation of Public Service Facilities’ Layout from the Perspective of 15-Minute Communities—Taking Chengdu of Sichuan Province as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Zixuan Zhang & Junchen Pan & Yun Qian, 2023. "Collaborative Governance for Participatory Regeneration Practices in Old Residential Communities within the Chinese Context: Cases from Beijing," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Zheng, Wei & Shen, Geoffrey Qiping & Wang, Hao & Hong, Jingke & Li, Zhengdao, 2017. "Decision support for sustainable urban renewal: A multi-scale model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 361-371.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Zhou, Yulin & Lan, Feng & Zhou, Tao, 2021. "An experience-based mining approach to supporting urban renewal mode decisions under a multi-stakeholder environment in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    3. Das, Biswaranjan & Rainey, Daniel V., 2006. "Analyzing Arkansas' Economic Growth: Need for Future Rural Development Strategies," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35381, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Nesticò, Antonio & Elia, Cristina & Naddeo, Vincenzo, 2020. "Sustainability of urban regeneration projects: Novel selection model based on analytic network process and zero-one goal programming," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Omidipoor, Morteza & Jelokhani-Niaraki, Mohammadreza & Moeinmehr, Athena & Sadeghi-Niaraki, Abolghasem & Choi, Soo-Mi, 2019. "A GIS-based decision support system for facilitating participatory urban renewal process," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    6. Han Wang & Yueli Xu, 2024. "Achieving Neighborhood-Level Collaborative Governance through Participatory Regeneration: Cases of Three Residential Heritage Neighborhoods in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Ferretti, V., 2021. "Framing territorial regeneration decisions: Purpose, perspective and scope," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Yugang He & Xiaodan Gao & Renhong Wu & Yinhui Wang & Baek-Ryul Choi, 2021. "How Does Sustainable Rural Tourism Cause Rural Community Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Tongtong Li & Xinrui Fang & Jiaqi Zhu & Qianliu Peng & Wenyu Zhao & Xin Fu, 2024. "Horizontal and Vertical Spatial Equity Analysis Based on Accessibility to Living Service Amenities: A Case Study of Xi’an, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-30, July.
    10. Shideler, David W., 2004. "Determinants Of Individual Social Capital Investment," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20224, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Marijke D'haese & Wim Verbeke & Guido Van Huylenbroeck & Johann Kirsten & Luc D'haese, 2005. "New Institutional Arrangements for Rural Development: The Case of Local Woolgrowers' Associations in the Transkei Area, South Africa," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(8), pages 1444-1466.
    12. Liu, Yilun & Zhu, A-Xing & Wang, Jingli & Li, Wenkai & Hu, Guohua & Hu, Yueming, 2019. "Land-use decision support in brownfield redevelopment for urban renewal based on crowdsourced data and a presence-and-background learning (PBL) method," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Shideler, David W. & Kraybill, David S., 2009. "Social capital: An analysis of factors influencing investment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 443-455, June.
    14. Wang, Hao & Zhao, Yizhu & Gao, Xichen & Gao, Boyang, 2021. "Collaborative decision-making for urban regeneration: A literature review and bibliometric analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    15. Qin Li & Zonghao Chen & Jingya Cui & Jiaqi Lin & Wenlong Li & Yijun Liu, 2024. "Beijing Symbiotic Courtyard Model’s Post Evaluation from the Perspective of Stock Renewal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-20, July.
    16. Martínez-Paz, José Miguel & Banos-González, Isabel & Martínez-Fernández, Julia & Esteve-Selma, Miguel Ángel, 2019. "Assessment of management measures for the conservation of traditional irrigated lands: The case of the Huerta of Murcia (Spain)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 382-391.
    17. Liu, Xiping & Zhang, Xiaoling & Sun, Wen, 2022. "Does the agglomeration of urban producer services promote carbon efficiency of manufacturing industry?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    18. castagna alina & colantonio emiliano & furia donatella, 2012. "Social Capital And Industrial District Development: The Role Of The Local Government," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 284-289, July.
    19. Kwasek, Mariola & Prandecki, Konrad & Zegar, Józef Stanisław, 2015. "From the research on socially-sustainable agriculture (34)," Multiannual Program Reports 236943, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    20. Zhang, Wei & Zhang, Xinxin & Wu, Guangdong, 2021. "The network governance of urban renewal: A comparative analysis of two cities in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1781-:d:1509895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.