IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i12p2045-d1532403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Use Characteristics of Commuter Rail Station Areas and Their Impact on Station Ridership: A Case Study of Japan Railways in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area

Author

Listed:
  • Yanan Gao

    (School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Xu Cui

    (School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Xiaozheng Sun

    (School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

Abstract

Exploring the relationship between land use characteristics and ridership in railway station areas provides crucial decision-making support for station area planning. Previous research has mostly focused on subways, with a lack of studies on the land use characteristics and ridership of commuter rail stations, particularly in relation to the differences and impacts across various passenger catchment areas (PCAs). This study employed a multinomial logit model to evaluate the land use characteristics within 1000 m of Japan Railways (JR) stations in four different PCAs of the Tokyo metropolitan area (TMA). Additionally, regression models and a multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) model were used to analyze how land use characteristics in these PCAs affected station ridership. The key findings were as follows: (1) the land use characteristics around commuter rail stations exhibit distinct zonal patterns; within 250 m, public transport stops and public service facilities are the most densely concentrated; the highest residential population density is found between 250 and 750 m; and commercial facilities are mostly clustered in the 500 to 750 m range; (2) the impact of land use factors on ridership varies in intensity across different spatial zones; the density of public transport stops and street network density is most significant within 250 m, whereas commercial facility density is greatest within the 500–750 m PCA; (3) The land use characteristics within 500 m of stations have greater explanatory power for passenger flow, and the goodness of fit of the MGWR model surpasses that of the linear regression model.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanan Gao & Xu Cui & Xiaozheng Sun, 2024. "Land Use Characteristics of Commuter Rail Station Areas and Their Impact on Station Ridership: A Case Study of Japan Railways in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2045-:d:1532403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2045/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2045/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sakano, Ryoichi & Benjamin, Julian, 2011. "A structural model of mode-activity choice: The case of commuter rail in a medium-size metropolitan area," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 434-445, March.
    2. Jinkyung Choi & Yong Lee & Taewan Kim & Keemin Sohn, 2012. "An analysis of Metro ridership at the station-to-station level in Seoul," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 705-722, May.
    3. Rémy Le Boennec & Julie Bulteau & Thierry Feuillet, 2022. "The role of commuter rail accessibility in the formation of residential land values: exploring spatial heterogeneity in peri-urban and remote areas," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(1), pages 163-186, August.
    4. Jinbao Zhao & Wei Deng & Yan Song & Yueran Zhu, 2014. "Analysis of Metro ridership at station level and station-to-station level in Nanjing: an approach based on direct demand models," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 133-155, January.
    5. Jun, Myung-Jin & Choi, Keechoo & Jeong, Ji-Eun & Kwon, Ki-Hyun & Kim, Hee-Jae, 2015. "Land use characteristics of subway catchment areas and their influence on subway ridership in Seoul," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 30-40.
    6. Feng, Jia & Li, Xiamiao & Mao, Baohua & Xu, Qi & Bai, Yun, 2017. "Weighted complex network analysis of the Beijing subway system: Train and passenger flows," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 474(C), pages 213-223.
    7. Knowles, Richard D., 2012. "Transit Oriented Development in Copenhagen, Denmark: from the Finger Plan to Ørestad," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 251-261.
    8. Cao, Xinyu Jason, 2019. "Examining the effect of the Hiawatha LRT on auto use in the Twin Cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 284-292.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu & Liu, Chao, 2019. "How does the station-area built environment influence Metrorail ridership? Using gradient boosting decision trees to identify non-linear thresholds," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 70-78.
    2. Li, Shaoying & Lyu, Dijiang & Huang, Guanping & Zhang, Xiaohu & Gao, Feng & Chen, Yuting & Liu, Xiaoping, 2020. "Spatially varying impacts of built environment factors on rail transit ridership at station level: A case study in Guangzhou, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Kepaptsoglou, Konstantinos & Stathopoulos, Antony & Karlaftis, Matthew G., 2017. "Ridership estimation of a new LRT system: Direct demand model approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 146-156.
    4. Bo Wan & Xudan Zhao & Yuhan Sun & Tao Yang, 2023. "Unraveling the Impact of Spatial Configuration on TOD Function Mix Use and Spatial Intensity: An Analysis of 47 Morning Top-Flow Stations in Beijing (2018–2020)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    5. Christian Martin Mützel & Joachim Scheiner, 2022. "Investigating spatio-temporal mobility patterns and changes in metro usage under the impact of COVID-19 using Taipei Metro smart card data," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 343-366, June.
    6. Ingvardson, Jesper Bláfoss & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2018. "How urban density, network topology and socio-economy influence public transport ridership: Empirical evidence from 48 European metropolitan areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 50-63.
    7. Vergel-Tovar, C. Erik & Rodriguez, Daniel A., 2018. "The ridership performance of the built environment for BRT systems: Evidence from Latin America," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 172-184.
    8. Wang, Jing & Wan, Feng & Dong, Chunjiao & Yin, Chaoying & Chen, Xiaoyu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal effects of built environment factors on varying rail transit station ridership patterns," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. Zhenbao Wang & Jiarui Song & Yuchen Zhang & Shihao Li & Jianlin Jia & Chengcheng Song, 2022. "Spatial Heterogeneity Analysis for Influencing Factors of Outbound Ridership of Subway Stations Considering the Optimal Scale Range of “7D” Built Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Peikun Li & Quantao Yang & Wenbo Lu & Shu Xi & Hao Wang, 2024. "An Improved Machine Learning Framework Considering Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity for Analyzing the Relationship Between Subway Station-Level Passenger Flow Resilience and Land Use-Related Built Environ," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Gao, Fan & Yang, Linchuan & Han, Chunyang & Tang, Jinjun & Li, Zhitao, 2022. "A network-distance-based geographically weighted regression model to examine spatiotemporal effects of station-level built environments on metro ridership," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    12. Lijie Yu & Yarong Cong & Kuanmin Chen, 2020. "Determination of the Peak Hour Ridership of Metro Stations in Xi’an, China Using Geographically-Weighted Regression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Aston, Laura & Currie, Graham & Kamruzzaman, Md. & Delbosc, Alexa & Teller, David, 2020. "Study design impacts on built environment and transit use research," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    14. Yuxin He & Yang Zhao & Kwok Leung Tsui, 2021. "An adapted geographically weighted LASSO (Ada-GWL) model for predicting subway ridership," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1185-1216, June.
    15. Lei Pang & Yuxiao Jiang & Jingjing Wang & Ning Qiu & Xiang Xu & Lijian Ren & Xinyu Han, 2023. "Research of Metro Stations with Varying Patterns of Ridership and Their Relationship with Built Environment, on the Example of Tianjin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Iseki, Hiroyuki & Liu, Chao & Knaap, Gerrit, 2018. "The determinants of travel demand between rail stations: A direct transit demand model using multilevel analysis for the Washington D.C. Metrorail system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 635-649.
    17. Xin Tong & Yaowu Wang & Edwin H. W. Chan & Qingfeng Zhou, 2018. "Correlation between Transit-Oriented Development (TOD), Land Use Catchment Areas, and Local Environmental Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Yadi Zhu & Feng Chen & Zijia Wang & Jin Deng, 2019. "Spatio-temporal analysis of rail station ridership determinants in the built environment," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2269-2289, December.
    19. Du, Qiang & Zhou, Yuqing & Huang, Youdan & Wang, Yalei & Bai, Libiao, 2022. "Spatiotemporal exploration of the non-linear impacts of accessibility on metro ridership," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    20. Su, Shiliang & Zhao, Chong & Zhou, Hao & Li, Bozhao & Kang, Mengjun, 2022. "Unraveling the relative contribution of TOD structural factors to metro ridership: A novel localized modeling approach with implications on spatial planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2045-:d:1532403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.