IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i11p1863-d1516377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Analysis of High-Quality Development and Coordination in Cities Along the Lower Yellow River

Author

Listed:
  • Ge Zhai

    (Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450003, China
    School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Maoxin Zhang

    (School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Tingting He

    (School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Peng Ren

    (Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450003, China)

Abstract

The current urban development in cities along the Lower Yellow River is in tension regarding human–land relations. To achieve the goals of ecological protection and high-quality development (HQD), it is urgent to scientifically measure and analyse the region’s function development and development coordination (DC). This study focuses on cities along the Lower Yellow River, constructs a three-dimensional HQD assessment framework based on urban functions through multiple remote sensing data, and evaluates DCs by feature classification. The results show the following: (1) The HQD of the study area shows a trend of decreasing and then increasing during 2000–2020 and reaches its highest level at the end. HQD shows a spatial trend of decreasing from south to north and from east to west. (2) The overall agricultural function of the study area declined slightly; the ecological function declined first and then increased, with the highest value occurring in 2000; and the urban function increased steadily and improved significantly after 2015. (3) DCs under different administrative levels are polarised, with high-level DCs exhibiting a spatial leader effect. (4) Urban development preferences in the study area are divergent, and the functional type with the highest share under different administrative scales is agro-ecological, which is mainly influenced by differences in natural base. This study reveals the characteristics of HQD and functional changes in cities along the Lower Yellow River, combined with a hierarchical classification of DCs and the types of development preferences, providing a reference for the formulation of spatial governance strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ge Zhai & Maoxin Zhang & Tingting He & Peng Ren, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of High-Quality Development and Coordination in Cities Along the Lower Yellow River," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1863-:d:1516377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1863/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1863/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu Dong & Wensi Fu & Yali Yang & Chenguang Liu & Guizhi Xue, 2022. "Study on the Evaluation of Green Technology Innovation Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors in the Central Plains City Cluster of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Z. Xu & K. Takeuchi & H. Ishidaira & X. Zhang, 2002. "Sustainability Analysis for Yellow River Water Resources Using the System Dynamics Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 16(3), pages 239-261, June.
    3. Jürgen Bruns-Berentelg & Luise Noring & Adam Grydehøj, 2022. "Developing urban growth and urban quality: Entrepreneurial governance and urban redevelopment projects in Copenhagen and Hamburg," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(1), pages 161-177, January.
    4. Curtis, Ian A., 2004. "Valuing ecosystem goods and services: a new approach using a surrogate market and the combination of a multiple criteria analysis and a Delphi panel to assign weights to the attributes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3-4), pages 163-194, October.
    5. Andrew D. Barnes & Malte Jochum & Steffen Mumme & Noor Farikhah Haneda & Achmad Farajallah & Tri Heru Widarto & Ulrich Brose, 2014. "Consequences of tropical land use for multitrophic biodiversity and ecosystem functioning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, December.
    6. Lingyu Kong & Xiaodong Xu & Wei Wang & Jinxiu Wu & Meiying Zhang, 2021. "Comprehensive Evaluation and Quantitative Research on the Living Protection of Traditional Villages from the Perspective of “Production–Living–Ecology”," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Yang, Renyi & Zhong, Changbiao & Yang, Zisheng & Yang, Shiqin & Ji, Guanqiu & Yu, Jingke & Cao, Linlin & Yang, Jinrong & Luo, Lei & Shen, Yicong & Zhang, Yongdong, 2024. "Study on China’s Farmland–Grain resource curse: Empirical testing based on 31 Provinces and 2843 Counties," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kubitza, Christoph & Dib, Jonida Bou & Kopp, Thomas & Krishna, Vijesh V. & Nuryartono, Nunung & Qaim, Matin & Romero, Miriam & Klasen, Stephan, 2019. "Labor savings in agriculture and inequality at different spatial scales: The expansion of oil palm in Indonesia," EFForTS Discussion Paper Series 26, University of Goettingen, Collaborative Research Centre 990 "EFForTS, Ecological and Socioeconomic Functions of Tropical Lowland Rainforest Transformation Systems (Sumatra, Indonesia)".
    2. Peng Zeng & Sihui Wu & Zongyao Sun & Yujia Zhu & Yuqi Chen & Zhi Qiao & Liangwa Cai, 2021. "Does Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces Have a Preference for Regional Endowments? A Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Nibedita Mukherjee & Jean Huge & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas & Nico Koedam, 2014. "Ecosystem service valuations of mangrove ecosystems to inform decision making and future valuation exercises," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/217963, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Rodríguez-Ortega, T. & Olaizola, A.M. & Bernués, A., 2018. "A novel management-based system of payments for ecosystem services for targeted agri-environmental policy," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PA), pages 74-84.
    5. Jesus R. Gastelum & Ganesh Krishnamurthy & Nemesciano Ochoa & Shane Sibbett & Margie Armstrong & Parag Kalaria, 2018. "The Use of System Dynamics Model to Enhance Integrated Resources Planning Implementation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(7), pages 2247-2260, May.
    6. Claudia Dislich & Elisabeth Hettig & Jan Salecker & Johannes Heinonen & Jann Lay & Katrin M Meyer & Kerstin Wiegand & Suria Tarigan, 2018. "Land-use change in oil palm dominated tropical landscapes—An agent-based model to explore ecological and socio-economic trade-offs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Yangyang Yuan & Yuchen Yang & Ruijun Wang & Yuning Cheng, 2022. "Predicting Rural Ecological Space Boundaries in the Urban Fringe Area Based on Bayesian Network: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, October.
    8. Sangha, Kamaljit K & Evans, Jay & Edwards, Andrew & Russell-Smith, Jeremy & Fisher, Rohan & Yates, Cameron & Costanza, Robert, 2021. "Assessing the value of ecosystem services delivered by prescribed fire management in Australian tropical savannas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    9. Jesús Gastélum & Juan Valdés & Steven Stewart, 2010. "A System Dynamics Model to Evaluate Temporary Water Transfers in the Mexican Conchos Basin," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(7), pages 1285-1311, May.
    10. Yutong Tian & Chunhui Li & Yujun Yi & Xuan Wang & Anping Shu, 2020. "Dynamic Model of a Sustainable Water Resources Utilization System with Coupled Water Quality and Quantity in Tianjin City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Liang-Cheng Chang & Chih-Chao Ho & Ming-Sheng Yeh & Chao-Chung Yang, 2011. "An Integrating Approach for Conjunctive-Use Planning of Surface and Subsurface Water System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(1), pages 59-78, January.
    12. Ainscough, Jacob & Wilson, Meriwether & Kenter, Jasper O., 2018. "Ecosystem services as a post-normal field of science," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PA), pages 93-101.
    13. Jesús Gastélum & Juan Valdés & Steven Stewart, 2009. "A Decision Support System to Improve Water Resources Management in the Conchos Basin," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(8), pages 1519-1548, June.
    14. Xu, Xu & Huang, Guanhua & Qu, Zhongyi & Pereira, Luis S., 2010. "Assessing the groundwater dynamics and impacts of water saving in the Hetao Irrigation District, Yellow River basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 301-313, December.
    15. Chao-Chung Yang & Liang-Cheng Chang & Chih-Chao Ho, 2008. "Application of System Dynamics with Impact Analysis to Solve the Problem of Water Shortages in Taiwan," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 22(11), pages 1561-1577, November.
    16. Rađenović Žarko & Veselinović Ivana, 2017. "Integrated AHP-TOPSIS Method for the Assessment of Health Management Information Systems Efficiency," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 55(1), pages 121-142, March.
    17. Chen, Ji & Wu, Liudan & Hao, Lili & Yu, Xiao & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2024. "Does the import of green products encourage green technology innovation? Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    18. Houdet, Joël & Trommetter, Michel & Weber, Jacques, 2012. "Understanding changes in business strategies regarding biodiversity and ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 37-46.
    19. Wang Xiao-jun & Zhang Jian-yun & Wang Jian-hua & He Rui-min & Amgad ElMahdi & Liu Jin-hua & Wang Xin-gong & David King & Shamsuddin Shahid, 2014. "Climate change and water resources management in Tuwei river basin of Northwest China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 107-120, January.
    20. Guangyang Wu & Lanhai Li & Sajjad Ahmad & Xi Chen & Xiangliang Pan, 2013. "A Dynamic Model for Vulnerability Assessment of Regional Water Resources in Arid Areas: A Case Study of Bayingolin, China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(8), pages 3085-3101, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1863-:d:1516377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.