IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i11p1734-d1504700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Coupling Coordination Relationship and Driving Factors of the Digital Economy and High-Quality Development of Rural Tourism: Insights from Chinese Experience Data

Author

Listed:
  • Hanni Liu

    (College of Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

  • Zhixiong Tan

    (School of Public Policy and Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Zancai Xia

    (College of Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

Abstract

Globally, rural tourism development faces challenges such as inadequate infrastructure, insufficient marketing resources, and unreliable service quality, all of which limit its potential. However, digital technology offers unprecedented opportunities to address these barriers. China’s experience in integrating digital technology into rural tourism provides a valuable case study for understanding the digitalization of rural tourism. This study constructs an index system to assess the coupling coordination relationship between the digital economy and the high-quality development of rural tourism (HQDRT). By employing methods such as the entropy method, coupling coordination degree model, obstacle factor model, and geographic detector, the study examines the evolution of this coupling coordination relationship and its driving mechanisms across 31 provinces (including regions and municipalities) in China from 2012 to 2021. The findings reveal that (1) The development of the digital economy generally lags behind that of the rural tourism, but the coupling coordination relationship between the two is steadily improving. (2) The level of coupling coordination increases from west to east, with spatial distribution patterns evolving from ‘antagonism’ to ‘adaptation’ and then to ‘coordination’ as they move eastward. Most provinces belong to the ‘adaptation’ type. (3) From a nationwide perspective, the primary obstacles impeding the development of the digital economy include an insufficient internet penetration rate, which consequently leads to underdeveloped internet finance development and telecommunications industry development. The major barriers to the HQDRT stem from an inadequate number of tourists and a lack of physical infrastructure. (4) Population density, consumer spending, and R&D are significant drivers of the coupling coordination relationship, with the interaction between urbanization rates and other factors generally weakening the degree of coupling.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanni Liu & Zhixiong Tan & Zancai Xia, 2024. "The Coupling Coordination Relationship and Driving Factors of the Digital Economy and High-Quality Development of Rural Tourism: Insights from Chinese Experience Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1734-:d:1504700
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1734/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1734/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tolkach, Denis & King, Brian, 2015. "Strengthening Community-Based Tourism in a new resource-based island nation: Why and how?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 386-398.
    2. Wookhyun An & Silverio Alarcón, 2020. "How Can Rural Tourism Be Sustainable? A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Kurtyka Marcak, Izabela & Janowska-Biernat, Justyna, 2020. "Opportunities and Barriers to the Development of Tourism in Rural Areas," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2020(3).
    4. Devesa, María & Laguna, Marta & Palacios, Andrés, 2010. "The role of motivation in visitor satisfaction: Empirical evidence in rural tourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 547-552.
    5. Alice Wanner & Ulrike Pröbstl-Haider, 2019. "Barriers to Stakeholder Involvement in Sustainable Rural Tourism Development—Experiences from Southeast Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Chun-Chu & Huang, Wei-Jue & Petrick, James F., 2016. "Holiday recovery experiences, tourism satisfaction and life satisfaction – Is there a relationship?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 140-147.
    2. Yuyu Wu & Jia Chen, 2023. "Spatial Distribution Heterogeneity and Influencing Factors of Different Leisure Agriculture Types in the City," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Wei Zheng & Hongliang Qiu & Alastair M. Morrison, 2023. "Applying a Combination of SEM and fsQCA to Predict Tourist Resource-Saving Behavioral Intentions in Rural Tourism: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Wei Zheng & Hongliang Qiu & Alastair M. Morrison & Wei Wei & Xihua Zhang, 2022. "Landscape and Unique Fascination: A Dual-Case Study on the Antecedents of Tourist Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intentions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Chiara Mazzocchi & Guido Sali, 2022. "Supporting mountain agriculture through “mountain product” label: a choice experiment approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 701-723, January.
    6. Ran Liu & Tai-Chee Wong, 2019. "Rural Tourism in Globalizing Beijing: Reproduction of the Mountainous Suburbs into a New Space of Leisure Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Sylwia Barwicka & Małgorzata Milecka, 2022. "The “Perfect Village” Model as a Result of Research on Transformation of Plant Cover—Case Study of the Puchaczów Commune," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Setiawan Priatmoko & Moaaz Kabil & Yitno Purwoko & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2021. "Rethinking Sustainable Community-Based Tourism: A Villager’s Point of View and Case Study in Pampang Village, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Yung-Lun Liu & Jui-Te Chiang & Pen-Fa Ko, 2023. "The benefits of tourism for rural community development," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. María Redondo-Carretero & Carmen Camarero-Izquierdo & Ana Gutiérrez-Arranz & Javier Rodríguez-Pinto, 2017. "Language tourism destinations: a case study of motivations, perceived value and tourists’ expenditure," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(2), pages 155-172, May.
    11. Shabbar Jaffry & Alexandros Apostolakis, 2011. "Evaluating individual preferences for the British Museum," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 35(1), pages 49-75, February.
    12. Torres-Sovero, Claudia & González, José A. & Martín-López, Berta & Kirkby, Christopher A., 2012. "Social–ecological factors influencing tourist satisfaction in three ecotourism lodges in the southeastern Peruvian Amazon," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 545-552.
    13. Christina Katsikari & Leonidas Hatzithomas & Thomas Fotiadis & Dimitrios Folinas, 2020. "Push and Pull Travel Motivation: Segmentation of the Greek Market for Social Media Marketing in Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    14. Carlos Fernández-Hernández & Carmelo J. León & Jorge E. Araña & Flora Díaz-Pére, 2016. "Market segmentation, activities and environmental behaviour in rural tourism," Tourism Economics, , vol. 22(5), pages 1033-1054, October.
    15. Fernández Guzmán Antonio Muñoz & Pérez-Gálvez Jesús Claudio & López-Guzmán Tomás, 2016. "Tourist motivations in a heritage destination in Spain," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 7(3), pages 226-235, December.
    16. Lin Ma & Gil Shapira & Damien de Walque & Quy‐Toan Do & Jed Friedman & Andrei A. Levchenko, 2022. "The Intergenerational Mortality Trade‐Off Of Covid‐19 Lockdown Policies," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(3), pages 1427-1468, August.
    17. Emmet McLoughlin & Kelly Maguire & James Hanrahan, 2023. "Barriers to Evidence-Based Sustainable Planning for Tourism: Perspectives from Ireland’s Local Authorities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-13, November.
    18. Carolina Aldao & Tanja A. Mihalic, 2020. "New Frontiers in Travel Motivation and Social Media: The Case of Longyearbyen, the High Arctic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    19. Jaffar Aman & Jaffar Abbas & Shahid Mahmood & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Shaher Bano, 2019. "The Influence of Islamic Religiosity on the Perceived Socio-Cultural Impact of Sustainable Tourism Development in Pakistan: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-27, May.
    20. He, Jun & Huang, Zilong & Mishra, Arunodaya Raj & Alrasheedi, Melfi, 2021. "Developing a new framework for conceptualizing the emerging sustainable community-based tourism using an extended interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-MULTIMOORA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1734-:d:1504700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.