IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i8p1225-d879307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Influence Mechanism of Intangible Cultural Heritage Distribution from Man–Land Relationship Perspective: A Case Study in Shandong Province

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Meng

    (School of Public Administration, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Chuanguang Zhu

    (Jinan Institute of Surveying and Mapping, Jinan 250100, China)

  • Jie Pu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Bo Wen

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Wentao Si

    (School of Public Administration, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

Abstract

Spatial autocorrelation, cold and hot spot analysis, and standard deviation ellipse analysis were used to analyze the spatial distribution of intangible cultural heritage (ICH). Geodetectors were used to reveal the factors that influenced the distribution in Shandong Province. The results showed that: (1) The ICH in Shandong Province covered most ICH types with the difference in the number of expressions of ICH of a different type. Traditional artistry, traditional art, traditional sports, recreation and acrobatics, and folk literature are the main types of ICH. (2) The spatial distribution of ICH showed a great difference. Multiple concentration areas and deficient areas were presented that followed the direction from southwest to northeast. (3) Man–land relationship-related factors such as population, waters, urban–rural size, and air temperature showed important influence on ICH distribution. The influence of interaction among influence factors is higher than a single factor. In summary, man–land relationships are the key factors that influenced ICH distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Meng & Chuanguang Zhu & Jie Pu & Bo Wen & Wentao Si, 2022. "Study on the Influence Mechanism of Intangible Cultural Heritage Distribution from Man–Land Relationship Perspective: A Case Study in Shandong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1225-:d:879307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1225/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1225/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ileana Pătru-Stupariu & Marioara Pascu & Matthias Bürgi, 2019. "Exploring Tangible and Intangible Heritage and its Resilience as a Basis to Understand the Cultural Landscapes of Saxon Communities in Southern Transylvania (Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Claudia Patricia Maldonado-Erazo & Nancy P. Tierra-Tierra & María de la Cruz del Río-Rama & José Álvarez-García, 2021. "Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage: The Amazonian Kichwa People," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Liu, Shichun & Ma, Libang & Yao, Yao & Cui, Xijuan, 2022. "Man-land relationship based on the spatial coupling of population and residential land – A case study of Yuzhong County in Longzhong Loess Hilly Region, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    4. Melis, Claudia & Chambers, Donna, 2021. "The construction of intangible cultural heritage: A Foucauldian critique," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    5. Shan, Zhengying & Feng, Changchun, 2018. "The Redundancy of Residential Land in Rural China: The evolution process, current status and policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 179-186.
    6. Daniel Sampaio Tavares & Fernando Brandão Alves & Isabel Breda Vásquez, 2021. "The Relationship between Intangible Cultural Heritage and Urban Resilience: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Koushik Chowdhury & Bhagirath Behera, 2020. "Traditional water bodies and ecosystem services: Empirical evidence from West Bengal, India," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(3), pages 219-235, August.
    8. Serena Lonardi & Yvonne Unterpertinger, 2022. "The Relevance of Intangible Cultural Heritage and Traditional Languages for the Tourism Experience: The Case of Ladin in South Tyrol," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Fausto O. Sarmiento & J. Tomás Ibarra & Antonia Barreau & J. Cristóbal Pizarro & Ricardo Rozzi & Juan A. González & Larry M. Frolich, 2017. "Applied Montology Using Critical Biogeography in the Andes," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(2), pages 416-428, March.
    10. Wright, William C.C. & Eppink, Florian V., 2016. "Drivers of heritage value: A meta-analysis of monetary valuation studies of cultural heritage," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 277-284.
    11. Chika Udeaja & Claudia Trillo & Kwasi G.B. Awuah & Busisiwe C.N. Makore & D. A. Patel & Lukman E. Mansuri & Kumar N. Jha, 2020. "Urban Heritage Conservation and Rapid Urbanization: Insights from Surat, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, March.
    12. Jing Shen & Feng-Tzu Huang & Rung-Jiun Chou, 2021. "Agricultural-Heritage-Oriented Rural Revitalization: Experiences from the Ancient Tea Town of Xiping," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Manuela Pelfini & Filippo Brandolini & Sara D’Archi & Luisa Pellegrini & Irene Bollati, 2021. "Papia civitas gloriosa: urban geomorphology for a thematic itinerary on geocultural heritage in Pavia (Central Po Plain, N Italy)," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 42-50, July.
    14. Hiroyuki Kajihara & Su Zhang & Wonhee You & Qingwen Min, 2018. "Concerns and Opportunities around Cultural Heritage in East Asian Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jie Zhang & Shengping Liu & Zijuan Zhao & Bin Li & Beilei Fan & Guomin Zhou, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Features and Influencing Factors of Homesteads Expansion at Village Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Bianrong Chang & Xinjun Ding & Jianchao Xi & Ruiying Zhang & Xianhong Lv, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Distribution Pattern and Tourism Utilization Potential of Intangible Cultural Heritage Resources in the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, February.
    3. Jin Yang & Lei Wang & Sheng Wei, 2022. "Spatial Variation and Its Local Influencing Factors of Intangible Cultural Heritage Development along the Grand Canal in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Xiangqiang Li & Mengqi Yang & Liangfu Long & Muxing Liu & Haimeng Liu & Jingyi Liu, 2023. "Geographical Distribution and Influencing Factors of Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alina Viorica Dumitrașcu & Camelia Teodorescu & Alexandra Cioclu, 2023. "Accessibility and Tourist Satisfaction—Influencing Factors for Tourism in Dobrogea, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Kaiming Li & Min Wang & Wenbin Hou & Fuyuan Gao & Baicui Xu & Jianjun Zeng & Dongyu Jia & Jun Li, 2023. "Spatial Distribution and Driving Mechanisms of Rural Settlements in the Shiyang River Basin, Western China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Fangqin Yang & Jianwei Sun & Junchang Yang & Xiaojin Liang, 2023. "Expanded Residential Lands and Reduced Populations in China, 2000–2020: Patch-Scale Observations of Rural Settlements," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Wang, Yuxia & Cao, Wenpu & Gao, Minyi & Gao, Yukun & Chi, Xingyu & Meng, Xing & Li, Shuang & Hu, Guohua, 2024. "Examining spatial coordination of human-land-industry-service system from a regionalization approach: A case study of Beijing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. YAMADA Keigo, 2024. "Literature Review of Cultural Heritage Economics - Focus on theoretical research of built heritage - (Japanese)," Discussion Papers (Japanese) 24014, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    6. Sittichok Plaiphum & Roengchai Tansuchat, 2023. "Cultural Capital of Sea Salt Farming in Ban Laem District of Phetchaburi Province as per the Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-27, August.
    7. Marioara Pascu & Ileana Pătru-Stupariu, 2021. "The Assessment of the Authenticity and Conservation Status of Cultural Landscapes in Southern Transylvania (Romania)," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Chenavaz, Régis Y. & Leocata, Marta & Ogonowska, Malgorzata & Torre, Dominique, 2022. "Sustainable tourism," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    9. Nan Guo & Edwin Hon Wan Chan & Esther Hiu Kwan Yung, 2020. "Alternative Governance Model for Historical Building Conservation in China: From Property Rights Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Rocío Silva-Pérez & Gema González-Romero, 2022. "GIAHS as an Instrument to Articulate the Landscape and Territorialized Agrifood Systems—The Example of La Axarquía (Malaga Province, Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Li, Jintao & Dong, Haoran & Li, Shaoxing, 2024. "Economic development and optimal allocation of land use in ecological emigration area in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    12. Douglas S. Noonan & Ilde Rizzo, 2017. "Economics of cultural tourism: issues and perspectives," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(2), pages 95-107, May.
    13. Yipeng Ge & Shubo Chen & Yueshan Ma & Yitong Wang & Yafei Guo & Qizheng Gan, 2024. "Ecosystem Services and Public Perception of Green Infrastructure from the Perspective of Urban Parks: A Case Study of Luoyang City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-25, September.
    14. Quan Zhou & Kai Zhu & Ling Kang & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Tea Culture Tourism Perception: A Study on the Harmony of Importance and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, February.
    15. Mario A. Fernandez & Shane L. Martin, 2020. "What’s so special about character?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3236-3251, December.
    16. Yang Gao & Mengmeng Li & Qingning Li & Keji Huang & Shiwei Shen, 2022. "Inheritors’ Happiness and Its Relevant Factors in Intangible Cultural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Jia Gao & Ge Song & Shuhan Liu, 2022. "Factors influencing farmers’ willingness and behavior choices to withdraw from rural homesteads in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 112-131, March.
    18. Libang Ma & Tianmin Tao & Yao Yao & Yawei Li, 2023. "Renovation Potential Evaluation and Type Identification of Rural Idle Residential Land: A Case Study of Yuzhong County, Longzhong Loess Hilly Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Ge Chen & Jiaying Shi & Yiping Xia & Katsunori Furuya, 2020. "The Sustainable Development of Urban Cultural Heritage Gardens Based on Tourists’ Perception: A Case Study of Tokyo’s Cultural Heritage Gardens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    20. Karol Król & Robert Kao & Józef Hernik, 2019. "The Scarecrow as an Indicator of Changes in the Cultural Heritage of Rural Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-23, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1225-:d:879307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.