IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i7p1009-d854416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring Land-Use Efficiency in China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2018

Author

Listed:
  • Yunchen Wang

    (Shaanxi Satellite Application Technology Center for Natural Resources, Shaanxi Institute of Geological Survey, Xi’an 710054, China
    Key Laboratory of Spatial-Temporal Big Data Analysis and Application of Natural Resources in Megacities, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shanghai 200063, China)

  • Boyan Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Lei Xu

    (National Engineering Research Center for Geographic Information System, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

Monitoring of the indicator Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 11.3.1 is important for understanding the coordination between land consumption rate (LCR) and population growth rate (PGR). However, the spatiotemporal indicator SDG 11.3.1 changes at the urban agglomeration (UA) level, and the relationship between LCR and PGR in the prefecture-level cities from different UAs remains unclear. In this study, we monitored the spatiotemporal indicator SDG 11.3.1 in the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) and its three major UAs (i.e., Chengdu–Chongqing (CC), the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River (MRYR), and the Yangtze River Delta (YRD)) for the periods 2000–2010, 2010–2015, and 2015–2018, using the space–time interaction (STI) method and Pearson’s method. Our major findings were as follows: (1) Compared with the world average of 1.28 for LCRPGR (i.e., ratio of LCR to PGR), except for the LCRPGR of the YRD (2000–2018) and CC (2000–2010), the LCRPGR of CC, the MRYR, and the YREB was lower than 1.28 during 2000–2018. (2) The gaps in both population and built-up area between the YREB and the three UAs did not narrow, but widened. (3) Compared with the LCRPGR in China, except for the LCRPGR of the YRD (2000–2018) and CC (2000–2010), the LCRPGR of the YREB increased from 1.21 to 1.23 between 2000–2010 and 2010–2015, and then decreased to 1.16 in 2015–2018, indicating that the relationship between LCR and PGR in the YREB is relatively stable. (4) A significant positive relationship ( p < 0.001) was found between LCR and PGR in CC, the MRYR, the YRD, and the YREB. We conclude that the indicator SDG 11.3.1 is a helpful tool for evaluating land-use efficiency caused by the LCR and PGR at the UA level. Our results provide information support for promoting sustainable and coordinative development between LCR and PGR.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunchen Wang & Boyan Li & Lei Xu, 2022. "Monitoring Land-Use Efficiency in China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2018," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:7:p:1009-:d:854416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/7/1009/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/7/1009/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koroso, Nesru H. & Zevenbergen, Jaap A. & Lengoiboni, Monica, 2020. "Urban land use efficiency in Ethiopia: An assessment of urban land use sustainability in Addis Ababa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Naledzani Mudau & Dennis Mwaniki & Lesiba Tsoeleng & Morwapula Mashalane & Donatien Beguy & Robert Ndugwa, 2020. "Assessment of SDG Indicator 11.3.1 and Urban Growth Trends of Major and Small Cities in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Zhuoya Zhang & Zheneng Hu & Fanglei Zhong & Qingping Cheng & Mingzhu Wu, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of High Quality Development in the Yunnan–Guizhou, Region Based on the Perspective of a Beautiful China and SDGs," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Hammad Gilani & Sohail Ahmad & Waqas Ahmed Qazi & Syed Muhammad Abubakar & Murtaza Khalid, 2020. "Monitoring of Urban Landscape Ecology Dynamics of Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT), Pakistan, Over Four Decades (1976–2016)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wentao Niu & Jingyi Shi & Zhenzhen Xu & Tianxi Wang & Hexiong Zhang & Xiaoshan Su, 2022. "Evaluating the Sustainable Land Use in Ecologically Fragile Regions: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Przemysław Śleszyński & Adam Kowalewski & Tadeusz Markowski & Paulina Legutko-Kobus & Maciej Nowak, 2020. "The Contemporary Economic Costs of Spatial Chaos: Evidence from Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-28, July.
    3. Lisha Pan & Hangang Hu & Xin Jing & Yang Chen & Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Yuefei Zhuo & Xueqi Wang, 2022. "The Impacts of Regional Cooperation on Urban Land-Use Efficiency: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Weiping Zhang & Peiji Shi & Huali Tong, 2022. "Research on Construction Land Use Benefit and the Coupling Coordination Relationship Based on a Three-Dimensional Frame Model—A Case Study in the Lanzhou-Xining Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Qu, Yanbo & Li, Yan & Zhao, Weiying & Zhan, Lingyun, 2023. "Does the rural housing land system reform model meeting the needs of farmers improve the welfare of farmers?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Muhammad Sadiq Khan & Sami Ullah & Tao Sun & Arif UR Rehman & Liding Chen, 2020. "Land-Use/Land-Cover Changes and Its Contribution to Urban Heat Island: A Case Study of Islamabad, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Workineh, Nigatu Amsalu, 2021. "Rezoning prior urban planning period for urban space development in Injibara Town, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    8. Yin Ma & Minrui Zheng & Xinqi Zheng & Yi Huang & Feng Xu & Xiaoli Wang & Jiantao Liu & Yongqiang Lv & Wenchao Liu, 2023. "Land Use Efficiency Assessment under Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    9. Hao Su & Shuo Yang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Urban Land Green Use Efficiency under Carbon Emission Constraints in the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, October.
    10. Yunchen Wang & Boyan Li, 2022. "The Spatial Disparities of Land-Use Efficiency in Mainland China from 2000 to 2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Mengqi Wei & Chong Du & Xuege Wang, 2023. "Analysis and Forecast of Land Use and Carbon Sink Changes in Jilin Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Shokhrukh-Mirzo Jalilov & Yun Chen & Nguyen Hong Quang & Minh Nguyen Nguyen & Ben Leighton & Matt Paget & Neil Lazarow, 2021. "Estimation of Urban Land-Use Efficiency for Sustainable Development by Integrating over 30-Year Landsat Imagery with Population Data: A Case Study of Ha Long, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    13. Tong Lin & Dafang Wu & Muzhuang Yang & Peifang Ma & Yanyan Liu & Feng Liu & Ziying Gan, 2022. "Evolution and Simulation of Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Storage and Sustainability Assessment in Karst Areas: A Case Study of Guizhou Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Hejie Wei & Yingying Gao & Qing Han & Ling Li & Xiaobin Dong & Mengxue Liu & Qingxiang Meng, 2022. "Quality Evaluation and Obstacle Identification of Human Settlements in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau Based on Multi-Source Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Mengcheng Wang & Nana Lin & Youming Dong & Yifeng Tang, 2023. "How Does New Energy Demonstration City Policy Promote Urban Land Use Efficiency in China? The Mediating Effect of Industrial Structure," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, May.
    16. Jiaxi Li & Changyuan Li & Chenyang Liu & Hailong Ge & Zheneng Hu & Zhuoya Zhang & Xueqiong Tang, 2023. "Analysis of the Coupling Coordination and Obstacle Factors between Sustainable Development and Ecosystem Service Value in Yunnan Province, China: A Perspective Based on the Production-Living-Ecologica," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    17. Wenli Dong & Xinyue Gao & Xiaowei Chen & Lihan Lin, 2023. "Industrial Park Renovation Strategy in a Poverty-Alleviated County Based on Inefficient Land Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Safiyeh Tayebi & Seyed Ali Alavi & Saeed Esfandi & Leyla Meshkani & Aliakbar Shamsipour, 2023. "Evaluation of Land Use Efficiency in Tehran’s Expansion between 1986 and 2021: Developing an Assessment Framework Using DEMATEL and Interpretive Structural Modeling Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    19. Rongtian Zhang & Jianfei Lu, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Pattern and Convergence Characteristics of Provincial Urban Land Use Efficiency under Environmental Constraints in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, August.
    20. Chengzhen Song & Qingfang Liu & Jinping Song & Zhengyun Jiang & Zhilin Lu & Yueying Chen, 2022. "Land Use Efficiency in the Yellow River Basin in the Background of China’s Economic Transformation: Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:7:p:1009-:d:854416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.