IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p7063-d406081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of SDG Indicator 11.3.1 and Urban Growth Trends of Major and Small Cities in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Naledzani Mudau

    (South African National Space Agency, Pretoria 0087, South Africa)

  • Dennis Mwaniki

    (Data and Analytics Unit, UN-Habitat, P.O. Box 30030, Nairobi 00100, Kenya)

  • Lesiba Tsoeleng

    (South African National Space Agency, Pretoria 0087, South Africa)

  • Morwapula Mashalane

    (South African National Space Agency, Pretoria 0087, South Africa)

  • Donatien Beguy

    (Data and Analytics Unit, UN-Habitat, P.O. Box 30030, Nairobi 00100, Kenya)

  • Robert Ndugwa

    (Data and Analytics Unit, UN-Habitat, P.O. Box 30030, Nairobi 00100, Kenya)

Abstract

Geospatial technologies play an important role in understanding and monitoring of land cover and land use change which is critical in achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 11 and related goals. In this study, we assessed SDG Indicator 11.3.1, Ratio of Land Consumption Rate to Population Growth Rate (LCRPGR) and other urban growth trends of four cities in South Africa using Landsat 5 TM and SPOT 2&5 satellite images and census data collected in 1996, 2001 and 2011. The 2011 built-up areas were mapped using South Africa’s SPOT 5 Global Human Settlements Layer (GHSL) system whereas the 1996 and 2001 built-up areas were extracted from Landsat 5 and SPOT 2 satellite imagery using a kNN object-based image analysis technique that uses textural and radiometric features. We used the built-up area layer to calculate the land consumption per capita and total urban change for each city, both of which have been identified as being important explanatory indicators for the ratio of LCRPGR. The assessment shows that the two major cities, Johannesburg and Tshwane, recorded a decline in the ratio of LCRPGR between the periods 1996–2001 and 2001–2011. In contrast, the LCRPGR ratios for secondary cities, Polokwane and Rustenburg increased during the same periods. The results further show that Tshwane recorded an increase in land consumption per capita between 1996 and 2001 followed by a decrease between 2001 and 2011. Over the same time, Johannesburg experienced a gradual decrease in land consumption per capita. On the other hand, Polokwane and Rustenburg recorded a unique growth trend, in which the overall increase in LCRPGR was accompanied by a decrease in land consumption per capita. In terms of land consumption, Tshwane experienced the highest urban growth rate between 1996 and 2001, whereas Johannesburg and Polokwane experienced the highest urban growth rates between 2001 and 2011. The information derived in this study shows the significance of Indicator 11.3.1 in understanding the urbanization trends in cities of different sizes in South Africa and creates a baseline for nationwide assessment of SDG 11.3.1.

Suggested Citation

  • Naledzani Mudau & Dennis Mwaniki & Lesiba Tsoeleng & Morwapula Mashalane & Donatien Beguy & Robert Ndugwa, 2020. "Assessment of SDG Indicator 11.3.1 and Urban Growth Trends of Major and Small Cities in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7063-:d:406081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7063/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7063/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Koroso, Nesru H., 2023. "Urban land policy and urban land use efficiency: An analysis based on remote sensing and institutional credibility thesis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Orion S. E. Cardenas-Ritzert & Jody C. Vogeler & Shahriar Shah Heydari & Patrick A. Fekety & Melinda Laituri & Melissa R. McHale, 2024. "Effects of Land Use Data Spatial Resolution on SDG Indicator 11.3.1 (Urban Expansion) Assessments: A Case Study Across Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Abdullah Addas, 2023. "Influence of Urban Green Spaces on Quality of Life and Health with Smart City Design," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Yunchen Wang & Boyan Li & Lei Xu, 2022. "Monitoring Land-Use Efficiency in China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2018," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Ziyan Ling & Weiguo Jiang & Yuan Lu & Yurong Ling & Ze Zhang & Chaoming Liao, 2023. "Continuous Long Time Series Monitoring of Urban Construction Land in Supporting the SDG 11.3.1—A Case Study of Nanning, Guangxi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Roshan Bhandari & Wenchao Xue & Salvatore G. P. Virdis & Ekbordin Winijkul & Thi Phuoc Lai Nguyen & Suraj Joshi, 2023. "Monitoring and Assessing Urbanization Progress in Thailand between 2000 and 2020 Using SDG Indicator 11.3.1," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Francisco J. Tapiador & Andrés Navarro & Josu Mezo & Sergio de la Llave & Jesús Muñoz, 2021. "Urban Vegetation Leveraging Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7063-:d:406081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.