IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10345-d1183745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industrial Park Renovation Strategy in a Poverty-Alleviated County Based on Inefficient Land Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Wenli Dong

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, B817, Anzhong Building, Zijingang Campus, 866 Yuhangtang Rd., Hangzhou 310058, China
    Centre for Balanced Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Xinyue Gao

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, B817, Anzhong Building, Zijingang Campus, 866 Yuhangtang Rd., Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Xiaowei Chen

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, B817, Anzhong Building, Zijingang Campus, 866 Yuhangtang Rd., Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Lihan Lin

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, B817, Anzhong Building, Zijingang Campus, 866 Yuhangtang Rd., Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

China has entered a new era of high-quality urban development. As an important stock resource in the city, old industrial parks face new situations of transformation and regeneration due to various problems such as chaotic land layout, low industrial efficiency, and lack of supporting facilities. However, existing research primarily focuses on case studies in large cities and rural areas, lacking fine-tuned adjustment plans for county-level cities in China. Therefore, this article aims to establish a decision-making and evaluation framework applicable to economically underdeveloped areas, providing a reference for the transformation of inefficient industrial land in county-level cities nationwide. Based on expert consultation, case studies, and other methods, a low-efficiency land evaluation model is constructed from three dimensions: spatial efficiency, operational efficiency, and industry screening, to tap the potential value of stock land. The research data are primarily provided by government departments and processed and quantified using GIS software. Based on the quantitative evaluation results of the Shengfang Industrial Park in Lianhua County, Jiangxi Province, three major strategic directions for land parcels with different renewal potentials are proposed: retention and improvement, rectification and renewal, and redevelopment and utilization. Targeted renewal strategies for the case industrial park are proposed from the aspects of spatial renewal and implementation mode guidance. The results of this study could provide suggestions for local government decision-making, which could contribute to the improvement of resource utilization efficiency and economic benefits. The findings could also provide references for the planning and development of industrial parks in other impoverished counties. Future research could focus on long-term monitoring, stakeholder engagement, and the application of evaluation results.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenli Dong & Xinyue Gao & Xiaowei Chen & Lihan Lin, 2023. "Industrial Park Renovation Strategy in a Poverty-Alleviated County Based on Inefficient Land Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10345-:d:1183745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10345/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10345/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. O’Driscoll, Conor & Crowley, Frank & Doran, Justin & McCarthy, Nóirín, 2023. "Land-use mixing in Irish cities: Implications for sustainable development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    2. Koroso, Nesru H. & Zevenbergen, Jaap A. & Lengoiboni, Monica, 2020. "Urban land use efficiency in Ethiopia: An assessment of urban land use sustainability in Addis Ababa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Sessa, Maria Rosaria & Russo, Alessio & Sica, Francesco, 2022. "Opinion paper on green deal for the urban regeneration of industrial brownfield land in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Gao, Xin & Zhang, Anlu & Sun, Zhanli, 2020. "How regional economic integration influence on urban land use efficiency？ A case study of Wuhan metropolitan area, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nina Danilina & Anna Korobeinikova & Irina Teplova, 2024. "Decision-Making Approach for Land Use in Urban Industrial Area Redevelopment Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-33, November.
    2. Mingqiang Xu & Yaoyao Luo & Dingyao Li, 2024. "Research on Evaluation of City–Industry Integration in Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-34, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lisha Pan & Hangang Hu & Xin Jing & Yang Chen & Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Yuefei Zhuo & Xueqi Wang, 2022. "The Impacts of Regional Cooperation on Urban Land-Use Efficiency: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Yin Ma & Minrui Zheng & Xinqi Zheng & Yi Huang & Feng Xu & Xiaoli Wang & Jiantao Liu & Yongqiang Lv & Wenchao Liu, 2023. "Land Use Efficiency Assessment under Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Chengzhen Song & Qingfang Liu & Jinping Song & Zhengyun Jiang & Zhilin Lu & Yueying Chen, 2022. "Land Use Efficiency in the Yellow River Basin in the Background of China’s Economic Transformation: Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Yue Zhou & Yi Chen & Yi Hu, 2021. "Assessing Efficiency of Urban Land Utilisation under Environmental Constraints in Yangtze River Delta, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Mingzhi Zhang & Hongyu Liu & Yangyue Su & Xiangyu Zhou & Zhaocheng Li & Chao Chen, 2022. "Assessment and Decomposition of Regional Land Use Efficiency of the Service Sector in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Wentao Niu & Jingyi Shi & Zhenzhen Xu & Tianxi Wang & Hexiong Zhang & Xiaoshan Su, 2022. "Evaluating the Sustainable Land Use in Ecologically Fragile Regions: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Zhen Wang & Xupeng Zhang & Chaozheng Zhang & Qing Yang, 2022. "How Regional Integration Affects Urban Green Development Efficiency: Evidence from Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Elena Di Pirro & Rúben Mendes & Teresa Fidélis & Lorenzo Sallustio & Peter Roebeling & Marco Marchetti & Bruno Lasserre, 2022. "The Embeddedness of Nature-Based Solutions in the Recovery and Resilience Plans as Multifunctional Approaches to Foster the Climate Transition: The Cases of Italy and Portugal," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Jannesar Niri, Anahita & Poelzer, Gregory A. & Zhang, Steven E. & Rosenkranz, Jan & Pettersson, Maria & Ghorbani, Yousef, 2024. "Sustainability challenges throughout the electric vehicle battery value chain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Weiping Zhang & Peiji Shi & Huali Tong, 2022. "Research on Construction Land Use Benefit and the Coupling Coordination Relationship Based on a Three-Dimensional Frame Model—A Case Study in the Lanzhou-Xining Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, March.
    11. Qu, Yanbo & Li, Yan & Zhao, Weiying & Zhan, Lingyun, 2023. "Does the rural housing land system reform model meeting the needs of farmers improve the welfare of farmers?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    12. Rachid Belaroussi & Margherita Pazzini & Israa Issa & Corinne Dionisio & Claudio Lantieri & Elena Díaz González & Valeria Vignali & Sonia Adelé, 2023. "Assessing the Future Streetscape of Rimini Harbor Docks with Virtual Reality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    13. Bin Duan & Xuanming Ji, 2021. "Can Carbon Finance Optimize Land Use Efficiency? The Example of China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Policy," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Workineh, Nigatu Amsalu, 2021. "Rezoning prior urban planning period for urban space development in Injibara Town, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. Xinhai Lu & Zhenxing Shi & Jia Li & Junhao Dong & Mingjie Song & Jiao Hou, 2022. "Research on the Impact of Factor Flow on Urban Land Use Efficiency from the Perspective of Urbanization," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Hao Su & Shuo Yang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Urban Land Green Use Efficiency under Carbon Emission Constraints in the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, October.
    17. Yunchen Wang & Boyan Li, 2022. "The Spatial Disparities of Land-Use Efficiency in Mainland China from 2000 to 2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Mengqi Wei & Chong Du & Xuege Wang, 2023. "Analysis and Forecast of Land Use and Carbon Sink Changes in Jilin Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Shokhrukh-Mirzo Jalilov & Yun Chen & Nguyen Hong Quang & Minh Nguyen Nguyen & Ben Leighton & Matt Paget & Neil Lazarow, 2021. "Estimation of Urban Land-Use Efficiency for Sustainable Development by Integrating over 30-Year Landsat Imagery with Population Data: A Case Study of Ha Long, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    20. Aurel Pera, 2020. "Assessing Sustainability Behavior and Environmental Performance of Urban Systems: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10345-:d:1183745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.