IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i12p2184-d990767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Evaluation for Acacia ( Acacia mangium × Acacia auriculiformis ) Plantations in the Mountainous Regions of Central Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Tung Gia Pham

    (International School–Hue University, Hue 52000, Vietnam)

  • Chau Thi Minh Tran

    (Faculty of Land Resources and Agricultural Environment, University of Agriculture and Forestry, Hue University, Hue 52000, Vietnam)

  • Hai Thi Nguyen

    (Faculty of Land Resources and Agricultural Environment, University of Agriculture and Forestry, Hue University, Hue 52000, Vietnam)

  • Ha Ngan Trinh

    (Faculty of Land Resources and Agricultural Environment, University of Agriculture and Forestry, Hue University, Hue 52000, Vietnam)

  • Ngoc Bich Nguyen

    (Faculty of Land Resources and Agricultural Environment, University of Agriculture and Forestry, Hue University, Hue 52000, Vietnam)

  • Ha Khoa Ngoc Nguyen

    (International School–Hue University, Hue 52000, Vietnam)

  • Tan Trong Tran

    (Faculty of Land Resources and Agricultural Environment, University of Agriculture and Forestry, Hue University, Hue 52000, Vietnam)

  • Huy Dinh Le

    (Faculty of Land Resources and Agricultural Environment, University of Agriculture and Forestry, Hue University, Hue 52000, Vietnam)

  • Quy Ngoc Phuong Le

    (Faculty of Land Resources and Agricultural Environment, University of Agriculture and Forestry, Hue University, Hue 52000, Vietnam)

Abstract

In recent years, both scientists and local governments have been giving serious attention to land evaluation, especially in regard to the use of agricultural land. This is with the intention of increasing the sustainability of agricultural production. In Vietnam, acacia plantations play an important role in the livelihoods of farmers in mountainous regions. Therefore, identifying suitable areas for acacia plantations is an important consideration within mountainous areas. This research was conducted in Nam Dong district, Central Vietnam, using six physical soil criteria for land evaluation by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and also the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP). The results have shown that the ranking of selected criteria in both methods was the same, but the weighting of each criterion was different. Among the six physical soil criteria, soil depth has the highest priority, followed by slope, soil organic carbon content, soil texture, soil pH, and soil type. The suitability maps for acacia plantations within the area studied have shown that 9344 ha were not suitable, and 99 ha had low suitability for acacia plantation by both methods. For the AHP approach, 928 hectares were in the range of moderate suitability, and 3080 hectares were in the high suitability class. In contrast, the FAHP method determined 905 hectares to be of the moderate suitability class and 3102 hectares to be of the high suitability class. Based on the observed acacia’s productivity and the scores of the two methods, it shows that the FAHP has a stronger correlation than the of AHP. Within the six selected criteria, the FAHP method can increase the accuracy of land evaluation results by 4.62% in comparison to the original AHP method. Therefore, the FAHP is the most suitable method for land evaluation, especially for agricultural land planning. Further studies should be integrated into more social and economic criteria for comprehensive land evaluation scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Tung Gia Pham & Chau Thi Minh Tran & Hai Thi Nguyen & Ha Ngan Trinh & Ngoc Bich Nguyen & Ha Khoa Ngoc Nguyen & Tan Trong Tran & Huy Dinh Le & Quy Ngoc Phuong Le, 2022. "Land Evaluation for Acacia ( Acacia mangium × Acacia auriculiformis ) Plantations in the Mountainous Regions of Central Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-27, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:2184-:d:990767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/12/2184/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/12/2184/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronja Herzberg & Tung Gia Pham & Martin Kappas & Daniel Wyss & Chau Thi Minh Tran, 2019. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Land Evaluation of Potential Agricultural Land Use Types in a Hilly Area of Central Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Ustaoglu, E. & Sisman, S. & Aydınoglu, A.C., 2021. "Determining agricultural suitable land in peri-urban geography using GIS and Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    3. Ghodsypour, S. H. & O'Brien, C., 1998. "A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 199-212, September.
    4. Nakandala, Dilupa & Samaranayake, Premaratne & Lau, H.C.W., 2013. "A fuzzy-based decision support model for monitoring on-time delivery performance: A textile industry case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(3), pages 507-517.
    5. Rujee Rodcha & Nitin K. Tripathi & Rajendra Prasad Shrestha, 2019. "Comparison of Cash Crop Suitability Assessment Using Parametric, AHP, and FAHP Methods," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Roland Cochard & Bien Thanh Vu & Dung Tri Ngo, 2021. "Acacia Plantation Development and the Configuration of Tree Farmers’ Agricultural Assets and Land Management—A Survey in Central Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-39, November.
    7. Wolfgang Ossadnik & Stefanie Schinke & Ralf H. Kaspar, 2016. "Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 421-457, March.
    8. Tufan Demirel & Nihan Çetin Demirel & Cengiz Kahraman, 2008. "Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and its Application," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Cengiz Kahraman (ed.), Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making, pages 53-83, Springer.
    9. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    10. Ebrahim Jahanshiri & Nur Marahaini Mohd Nizar & Tengku Adhwa Syaherah Tengku Mohd Suhairi & Peter J. Gregory & Ayman Salama Mohamed & Eranga M. Wimalasiri & Sayed N. Azam-Ali, 2020. "A Land Evaluation Framework for Agricultural Diversification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Trædal, Leif Tore & Vedeld, Pål, 2018. "Cultivating forests: The role of forest land in household livelihood adaptive strategies in the Bac Kan Province of northern Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 249-258.
    12. Tham, La Thi & Darr, Dietrich & Pretzsch, Jürgen, 2021. "Analysis of Acacia hybrid timber value chains: A case study of woodchip and furniture production in central Vietnam," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Irina Canco & Drita Kruja & Tiberiu Iancu, 2021. "AHP, a Reliable Method for Quality Decision Making: A Case Study in Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pınar Kaya Samut, 2017. "Integrated FANP-f-MIGP model for supplier selection in the renewable energy sector," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 427-450, May.
    2. Paweł Karczmarek & Witold Pedrycz & Adam Kiersztyn, 2021. "Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in a Graphical Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 463-481, April.
    3. Klaus D. Goepel, 2019. "Comparison of Judgment Scales of the Analytical Hierarchy Process — A New Approach," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 445-463, March.
    4. Chan, Felix T.S. & Kumar, Niraj, 2007. "Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 417-431, August.
    5. Lupo, Toni, 2013. "Handling stakeholder uncertain judgments in strategic transport service analyses," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 54-63.
    6. Junqiao Zhang & Xuebo Chen & Qiubai Sun, 2019. "A Safety Performance Assessment Framework for the Petroleum Industry’s Sustainable Development Based on FAHP-FCE and Human Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Mimica R. Milošević & Miloš M. Nikolić & Dušan M. Milošević & Violeta Dimić, 2022. "Managing Resources Based on Influential Indicators for Sustainable Economic Development: A Case Study in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Ustaoglu, E. & Aydınoglu, A.C., 2020. "Suitability evaluation of urban construction land in Pendik district of Istanbul, Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Magdalena Ligus, 2017. "Evaluation of Economic, Social and Environmental Effects of Low-Emission Energy Technologies Development in Poland: A Multi-Criteria Analysis with Application of a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Irina Vinogradova-Zinkevič, 2023. "Comparative Sensitivity Analysis of Some Fuzzy AHP Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-41, December.
    11. Jui-Te Chiang & Chei-Chang Chiou & Shuh-Chyi Doong & I-Fang Chang, 2020. "Research on the Construction of Performance Indicators for the Marketing Alliance of Catering Industry and Credit Card Issuing Banks by Using the Balanced Scorecard and Fuzzy AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-24, October.
    12. Esther Jose & Puneet Agarwal & Jun Zhuang & Jose Swaminathan, 2023. "A multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluating the performance of Indian railway zones," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 1133-1168, June.
    13. Roland Cochard & Bien Thanh Vu & Dung Tri Ngo, 2021. "Acacia Plantation Development and the Configuration of Tree Farmers’ Agricultural Assets and Land Management—A Survey in Central Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-39, November.
    14. Amir Hossein Salimi & Amir Noori & Hossein Bonakdari & Jafar Masoompour Samakosh & Ehsan Sharifi & Mohammadreza Hassanvand & Baharam Gharabaghi & Mehdi Agharazi, 2020. "Exploring the Role of Advertising Types on Improving the Water Consumption Behavior: An Application of Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy VIKOR Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-33, February.
    15. Hillary Mugiyo & Vimbayi G. P. Chimonyo & Mbulisi Sibanda & Richard Kunz & Cecilia R. Masemola & Albert T. Modi & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, 2021. "Evaluation of Land Suitability Methods with Reference to Neglected and Underutilised Crop Species: A Scoping Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, January.
    16. Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione & Francesco Amato & Santolo Cozzolino & Giuseppe Russo & Maria Romano & Giovanni Improta, 2022. "A Hybrid Analytic Hierarchy Process and Likert Scale Approach for the Quality Assessment of Medical Education Programs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Mukherjee, Krishnendu & Sarkar, Bijon & Bhattacharyya, Ardhendu, 2012. "Supplier selection by F-compromise method: a case study of cement industry of NE India," MPRA Paper 57786, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2013.
    18. B. Adenso-Díaz & N. García Álvarez & J. A. Lago Alba, 2020. "A fuzzy AHP classification of container terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(2), pages 218-238, June.
    19. Prakash, Chandra & Barua, M.K., 2016. "An analysis of integrated robust hybrid model for third-party reverse logistics partner selection under fuzzy environment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 63-81.
    20. Cheng-Yuan Ku & Ching-Ter Chang & Hui-Ping Ho, 2010. "Global supplier selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy goal programming," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 623-640, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:2184-:d:990767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.