IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i10p1759-d937960.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analytical Framework for Evaluating Farmland Market Regulation: Examining the German Land Transaction Law

Author

Listed:
  • Luise Meissner

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5, 37073 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Lisa Kappenberg

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5, 37073 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Oliver Musshoff

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5, 37073 Göttingen, Germany)

Abstract

Farmland market regulation and related political interventions are prominent in the current discussion, in particular, because the market faces big price increases. This discussion is often shaped by subjective and emotional perceptions. Its complexity is increased by the considerable number of affected parties and opposing arguments. The parties involved may be focused on different aspects and have different requirements with regard to farmland market regulation instruments. The objective of this paper is to present an analytical framework for more efficient observation and evaluation of the ongoing discussion. The framework was developed using information about the relevant political interventions to structure the arguments and parties. It allows for a holistic evaluation of farmland market regulation. To provide an example of how farmland market regulation can be analyzed, the German land transaction law was broken down by process, parties, and arguments. Within the analytical framework, arguments are weighted individually. As a result, the various farmland market instruments can be discussed in a structured way. Additionally, the framework provides information about the utility of the respective instruments in defined cases from different perspectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Luise Meissner & Lisa Kappenberg & Oliver Musshoff, 2022. "An Analytical Framework for Evaluating Farmland Market Regulation: Examining the German Land Transaction Law," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-12, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1759-:d:937960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1759/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1759/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Seifert & Christoph Kahle & Silke Hüttel, 2021. "Price Dispersion in Farmland Markets: What Is the Role of Asymmetric Information?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(4), pages 1545-1568, August.
    2. Forstner, Bernhard & Tietz, Andreas, 2013. "Kapitalbeteiligung nichtlandwirtschaftlicher und überregional ausgerichteter Investoren an landwirtschaftlichen Unternehmen in Deutschland," Thünen Report 177963, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    3. D. Parker, 2002. "Economic Regulation: a review of issues," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(4), pages 493-519, December.
    4. Plogmann, Jana & Mußhoff, Oliver & Odening, Martin & Ritter, Matthias, 2022. "Farm growth and land concentration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. repec:lic:licosd:35414 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Kurowska, Krystyna & Kryszk, Hubert & Marks-Bielska, Renata & Mika, Monika & Leń, Przemysław, 2020. "Conversion of agricultural and forest land to other purposes in the context of land protection: Evidence from Polish experience," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Noland, Kevin & Norvell, Jonathan & Paulson, Nicholas D. & Schnitkey, Gary D., 2011. "The Role of Farmland in an Investment Portfolio: Analysis of Illinois Endowment Farms," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2011, pages 1-42, June.
    8. Lehn, Friederike & Bahrs, Enno, 2018. "Analysis of factors influencing standard farmland values with regard to stronger interventions in the German farmland market," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 138-146.
    9. Happe, Kathrin & Kellermann, Konrad & Balmann, Alfons, 2006. "Agent-based analysis of agricultural policies: An illustration of the agricultural policy simulator AgriPoliS, its adaptation and behavior," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(1).
    10. Ciaian, Pavel, & Kancs, d’Artis & Swinnen, Jo & Van Herck, Kristine & Vranken, Liesbet, 2012. "Sales Market Regulations for Agricultural Land in EU Member States and Candidate Countries," Factor Markets Working Papers 116, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    11. Forstner, Bernhard & Tietz, Andreas, 2013. "Kapitalbeteiligung nichtlandwirtschaftlicher und überregional ausgerichteter Investoren an landwirtschaftlichen Unternehmen in Deutschland," Thünen Reports 5, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    12. David A. Lins & Bruce J. Sherrick & Aravind Venigalla, 1992. "Institutional Portfolios: Diversification through Farmland Investment," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 20(4), pages 549-571, December.
    13. Brett Olsen & Jeffrey Stokes, 2015. "Is Farm Real Estate The Next Bubble?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 355-376, April.
    14. Silke Hüttel & Martin Odening & Vanessa von Schlippenbach, 2015. "Steigende landwirtschaftliche Bodenpreise: Anzeichen für eine Spekulationsblase?," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 82(3), pages 37-43.
    15. Daniel P. Bigelow & Jennifer Ifft & Todd Kuethe, 2020. "Following the Market? Hedonic Farmland Valuation Using Sales Prices versus Self-reported Values," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 96(3), pages 418-440.
    16. Biro, Szabolcs, 2008. "The Hungarian land market after EU Accession," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 107, pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tamara Krawchenko & John Tomaney, 2023. "The Governance of Land Use: A Conceptual Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-11, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heinrich, Florian & Appel, Franziska & Balmann, Alfons, 2019. "Can land market regulations fulfill their promises?," EconStor Preprints 208388, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    2. Heinrich, Florian & Appel, Franziska & Balmann, Alfons, 2019. "Can land market regulations fulfill their promises?," FORLand Working Papers 12 (2019), Humboldt University Berlin, DFG Research Unit 2569 FORLand "Agricultural Land Markets – Efficiency and Regulation".
    3. Heinrich, F. & Appel, F., 2018. "Do investors ruin Germany s peasant agriculture?," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277171, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Stefan Seifert & Christoph Kahle & Silke Hüttel, 2021. "Price Dispersion in Farmland Markets: What Is the Role of Asymmetric Information?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(4), pages 1545-1568, August.
    5. Johanna Jauernig & Stephan Brosig & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Profession and residency matter: Farmers' preferences for farmland price regulation in Germany," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 816-834, September.
    6. Meissner, Luise & Musshoff, Oliver, 2022. "Does farmland market regulation generate utility? Discussing arguments and actors within the German land transaction law," 96th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2022, K U Leuven, Belgium 321157, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    7. Lars Isenhardt & Stefan Seifert & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Tenant Favoritism and Right of First Refusals in Farmland Auctions: Competition and Price Effects," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 99(2), pages 302-324.
    8. Plogmann, Jana & Mußhoff, Oliver & Odening, Martin & Ritter, Matthias, 2022. "Farmland sales under returns and price uncertainty," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    9. Stefan Seifert & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Is there a risk of a winner’s curse in farmland auctions?," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(3), pages 1140-1177.
    10. Seifert, Stefan & Hüttel, Silke & Werwatz, Axel, 2023. "Organic cultivation and farmland prices: Does certification matter?," FORLand Working Papers 28 (2023), Humboldt University Berlin, DFG Research Unit 2569 FORLand "Agricultural Land Markets – Efficiency and Regulation".
    11. Li, Xin, 2016. "The Farmland Valuation Revisited," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, April.
    12. Marlene Kionka & Martin Odening & Jana Plogmann & Matthias Ritter, 2021. "Measuring liquidity in agricultural land markets," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 82(4), pages 690-713, September.
    13. Kionka, Marlene & Kuethe, Todd H. & Musshoff, Oliver & Odening, Martin & Ritter, Matthias, 2022. "Bargaining Power in the Agricultural Land Rental Market," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322186, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Bunkus, Ramona & Theesfeld, Insa, 2018. "Land Grabbing In Europe?," 58th Annual Conference, Kiel, Germany, September 12-14, 2018 275859, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    15. Songjiao Chen & William W. Wilson & Ryan Larsen & Bruce Dahl, 2015. "Investing in Agriculture as an Asset Class," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 353-371, June.
    16. Grau, Aaron & Jasic, Svetlana & Ritter, Matthias & Odening, Martin, 2019. "The impact of production intensity on agricultural land prices," FORLand Working Papers 09 (2019), Humboldt University Berlin, DFG Research Unit 2569 FORLand "Agricultural Land Markets – Efficiency and Regulation".
    17. Wachter, Magdalena & Wytrzens, Hans Karl, 2022. "Barn or building lot? A cross-case comparison viewing the role of agricultural interests in Austria’s local spatial planning processes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    18. repec:ags:aaea22:335557 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Henning Schaak & Luise Meissner & Oliver Musshoff, 2023. "New insights on regional differences of the farmland price structure: An extended replication study on the parcel size–price relationship," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 1427-1449, September.
    20. Graubner, Marten & Hüttel, Silke, 2024. "Rental and sale prices of agricultural lands under spatial competition," FORLand Working Papers 29 (2024), Humboldt University Berlin, DFG Research Unit 2569 FORLand "Agricultural Land Markets – Efficiency and Regulation".
    21. Tietz, Andreas, 2017. "Überregional aktive Kapitaleigentümer in ostdeutschen Agrarunternehmen: Entwicklungen bis 2017," Thünen Report 265014, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1759-:d:937960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.