IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i9p947-d631282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Item Response Theory Model of Inter-Regional Collaboration for Transportation Planning in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Soyoung Kim

    (School of Liberal Arts, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul 01811, Korea)

  • Woo-Je Kim

    (College of Business and Technology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul 01811, Korea)

  • Richard Clark Feiock

    (Local Governance Lab., Local Governance Research, LLC, Tallahassee, FL 32303, USA)

Abstract

Regional governments and regional intergovernmental organizations play an increasingly important role in land use and transportation planning in many countries. In the U.S., regional organizations such as metropolitan planning organizations provide regional forums and institutions to coordinate actions of local government necessary to overcome collective action problems that result from the fragmentation of local authority. Their regional scope allows them to directly address collaboration problems or broker collaborative arrangements among local governments within their boundaries. Nevertheless, the scale of regional problems often extends beyond the boundaries of these regional entities. Thus, collaboration across regional governance organizations is necessary to address problems that have multi-regional impacts, such as large transportation projects. Extant research generally measures regional collaboration based on counts of collaboration actions undertaken, but this does not account for the fact that some are symbolic, while others require resources and commitment. Drawing insights from the institutional collective action framework, we advance an explanation for how regional organizations overcome collaboration risks to participate in collaborative solutions to regional and multi-regional problems. The analysis employs a unique national survey of metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) and adds a novel application of item response theory (IRT) to capture differences in risk or difficulty among collaborative actions. The IRT results offer support for our ICA-based explanation of collaboration commitments. The implications of the findings for theory development and empirical study of RIGOs are discussed in conclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Soyoung Kim & Woo-Je Kim & Richard Clark Feiock, 2021. "An Item Response Theory Model of Inter-Regional Collaboration for Transportation Planning in the United States," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:9:p:947-:d:631282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/9/947/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/9/947/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minsun Song & Kyujin Jung & Namhoon Ki & Richard C Feiock, 2020. "Testing structural and relational embeddedness in collaboration risk," Rationality and Society, , vol. 32(1), pages 67-92, February.
    2. Elisabeth R. Gerber & Adam Douglas Henry & Mark Lubell, 2013. "Political Homophily and Collaboration in Regional Planning Networks," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(3), pages 598-610, July.
    3. Seggerman, Karen E. & Kramer, Jeffrey, 2012. "Regional MPO Alliances in Florida: A Model for Setting Megaregion Transportation Policies?," 53rd Annual Transportation Research Forum, Tampa, Florida, March 15-17, 2012 207093, Transportation Research Forum.
    4. Deborah L. Bleviss, 2021. "Transportation is critical to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the United States," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(2), March.
    5. Chen Huang & Tao Chen & Hongtao Yi & Xiaolin Xu & Shiying Chen & Wenna Chen, 2017. "Collaborative Environmental Governance, Inter-Agency Cooperation and Local Water Sustainability in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Judith Innes & David Booher & Sarah Di Vittorio, 2011. "Strategies for Megaregion Governance," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(1), pages 55-67.
    7. Elisa Barbour & Elizabeth Deakin, 2012. "Smart Growth Planning for Climate Protection," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(1), pages 70-86.
    8. Yao Liu & Jiannan Wu & Hongtao Yi & Jing Wen, 2021. "Under what conditions do governments collaborate? A qualitative comparative analysis of air pollution control in China," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(11), pages 1664-1682, November.
    9. Jisun Youm & Jessica Terman, 2020. "Dynamic Collaboration: The Effects of External Rules and Collaboration Scope on Interlocal Collaboration," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(6), pages 823-841, November.
    10. Pedro J. Camões & António Tavares & Filipe Teles, 2021. "Assessing the intensity of cooperation: a study of joint delegation of municipal functions to inter-municipal associations," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 593-615, July.
    11. Gian-Claudia Sciara, 2017. "Metropolitan Transportation Planning: Lessons From the Past, Institutions for the Future," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(3), pages 262-276, July.
    12. Jisun Youm & Richard C. Feiock, 2019. "Interlocal collaboration and local climate protection," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 777-802, November.
    13. Aaron Deslatte & Richard C. Feiock & Kathryn Wassel, 2017. "Urban Pressures and Innovations: Sustainability Commitment in the Face of Fragmentation and Inequality," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 34(5), pages 700-724, September.
    14. Andrew R. Goetz & Paul Stephen Dempsey & Carl Larson, 2002. "Metropolitan Planning Organizations: Findings and Recommendations for Improving Transportation Planning," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 32(1), pages 87-105, Winter.
    15. Youngmi Lee, 2016. "From Competition to Collaboration: Intergovernmental Economic Development Policy Networks," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 171-188, March.
    16. Clinton, Joshua & Jackman, Simon & Rivers, Douglas, 2004. "The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 98(2), pages 355-370, May.
    17. Zachary Spicer, 2015. "Regionalism, Municipal Organization, and Interlocal Cooperation in Canada," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 41(2), pages 137-150, June.
    18. Kyujin Jung, 2017. "Sources of Organizational Resilience for Sustainable Communities: An Institutional Collective Action Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linhai Wu & Liwei Zhang & Yufeng Li, 2023. "Basis for fulfilling responsibilities, behavior, and professionalism of government agencies and effectiveness in public–public collaboration for food safety risk management," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soyoung Kim, 2021. "Integration of Policy Decision Making for Sustainable Land Use within Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-10, September.
    2. Heyer, Johanna & Palm, Matthew & Niemeier, Deb, 2020. "Are we keeping up? Accessibility, equity and air quality in regional planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Minsun Song, 2018. "Does having a strong commitment matter in building sustainable networks?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 551-564, March.
    4. Wanjuan Wang & Hongbo Gong, 2022. "Formation Mechanism of a Coastal Zone Environment Collaborative Governance Relationship: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on fsQCA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-26, September.
    5. Sciara, Gian-Claudia & Rahman, Mashrur & Walthall, Rydell, 2021. "A seat at the table? Transit representation in U.S. metropolitan planning," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 165-173.
    6. Sciara, Gian-Claudia & Strand, Sarah, 2017. "When Do Local Governments Regulate Land Use to Serve Regional Goals? Results of a Survey Tracking Land Use Changes that Support Sustainable Mobility," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0qr4350c, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    7. David G Proffitt & Keith Bartholomew & Reid Ewing & Harvey J Miller, 2019. "Accessibility planning in American metropolitan areas: Are we there yet?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(1), pages 167-192, January.
    8. Jayce L. Farmer & Andres J. Rodriguez Lombeida, 2021. "How State Interventions affect Municipalities Taking the Lead in Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Aaron Deslatte & Richard C Feiock, 2019. "The Collaboration Riskscape: Fragmentation, Problem Types and Preference Divergence in Urban Sustainability," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 49(2), pages 352-377.
    10. Sciara , Gian-Claudia & Handy, Susan, 2013. "Cultivating Cooperation without Control: A Study of California’s MPO-Driven Smart Growth Programs," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1xq050ts, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    11. Shorna B. Allred & Allison M. Chatrchyan & Giorgi Tsintsadze, 2022. "Local municipal capacity for climate change action in New York State: Exploring the urban–rural divide," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(5), pages 570-601, September.
    12. Janel Jett & Leigh Raymond, 2021. "Issue Framing and U.S. State Energy and Climate Policy Choice," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(3), pages 278-299, May.
    13. Francis,David C. & Kubinec ,Robert, 2022. "Beyond Political Connections : A Measurement Model Approach to Estimating Firm-levelPolitical Influence in 41 Economies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10119, The World Bank.
    14. Su, Rongxiang & Xiao, Jingyi & McBride, Elizabeth C. & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2021. "Understanding senior's daily mobility patterns in California using human mobility motifs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    15. Mateusz Naramski & Adam R. Szromek, 2019. "Configuring a Trust-based Inter-organizational Cooperation Network for Post-industrial Tourist Organizations on a Tourist Route," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Arianna Degan & Antonio Merlo, 2006. "Do Voters Vote Sincerely?," PIER Working Paper Archive 06-008, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    17. Steven Spears & Marlon G Boarnet & Douglas Houston, 2017. "Driving reduction after the introduction of light rail transit: Evidence from an experimental-control group evaluation of the Los Angeles Expo Line," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(12), pages 2780-2799, September.
    18. Arianna Degan & Antonio Merlo, 2011. "A Structural Model Of Turnout And Voting In Multiple Elections," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 9(2), pages 209-245, April.
    19. Griffin, Greg Phillip & Jiao, Junfeng, 2019. "The Geography and Equity of Crowdsourced Public Participation for Active Transportation Planning," SocArXiv 9ghrn, Center for Open Science.
    20. Lei Du & Yingbin Feng & Li Yaning Tang & Wei Kang & Wei Lu, 2020. "Networks in disaster emergency management: a systematic review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 1-27, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:9:p:947-:d:631282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.