IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v32y2002i1p87-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Metropolitan Planning Organizations: Findings and Recommendations for Improving Transportation Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew R. Goetz
  • Paul Stephen Dempsey
  • Carl Larson

Abstract

With the enactment of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act in 1991, metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) became more important institutions for planning and funding regional transportation systems. This study attempts to assess the success of MPOs in four fast-growing areas- Dallas/Ft. Worth, Denver, Phoenix, and Seattle-in meeting regional transportation needs. The research identifies the criteria that distinguish more successful from less successful MPOs-effective leadership, staff competence and credibility, quality public involvement, development of a regional ethos, streamlined and efficient processes, cooperative relationships with the state DOT, land-use coordination, and accountability to members-and offers suggestions for improving transportation planning. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew R. Goetz & Paul Stephen Dempsey & Carl Larson, 2002. "Metropolitan Planning Organizations: Findings and Recommendations for Improving Transportation Planning," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 32(1), pages 87-105, Winter.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:32:y:2002:i:1:p:87-105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:mpr:mprres:8097 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:mpr:mprres:8165 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Darrin Hicks & Carl Larson & Christopher Nelson & David L. Olds & Erik Johnston, 2008. "The Influence of Collaboration on Program Outcomes," Evaluation Review, , vol. 32(5), pages 453-477, October.
    4. Andrew E. G. Jonas & Andrew R. Goetz & Sutapa Bhattacharjee, 2014. "City-regionalism as a Politics of Collective Provision: Regional Transport Infrastructure in Denver, USA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2444-2465, August.
    5. Soyoung Kim & Woo-Je Kim & Richard Clark Feiock, 2021. "An Item Response Theory Model of Inter-Regional Collaboration for Transportation Planning in the United States," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Pierre Filion & Anna Kramer & Gary Sands, 2016. "Recentralization as an Alternative to Urban Dispersion: Transformative Planning in a Neoliberal Societal Context," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 658-678, May.
    7. David G Proffitt & Keith Bartholomew & Reid Ewing & Harvey J Miller, 2019. "Accessibility planning in American metropolitan areas: Are we there yet?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(1), pages 167-192, January.
    8. Kimberly Boller & Deborah Daro & Patricia Del Grosso & Russell Cole & Diane Paulsell & Bonnie Hart & Brandon Coffee-Borden & Debra Strong & Heather Zaveri & Margaret Hargreaves, "undated". "Making Replication Work: Building Infrastructure to Implement, Scale-up, and Sustain Evidence-Based Early Childhood Home Visiting Programs with Fidelity," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 717d1a3c61eb46ad887f306a7, Mathematica Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:32:y:2002:i:1:p:87-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.