IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i5p443-d540541.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Challenges for Land Use Planning and Its Environmental Assessments in the Abuja City-Region, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Evidence Chinedu Enoguanbhor

    (Institute of Geography, Humboldt University of Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany
    Integrative Research Institute on Transformations of Human-Environment Systems, Humboldt University of Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany)

  • Florian Gollnow

    (Department of Earth & Environment, Boston University, 685 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA)

  • Blake Byron Walker

    (Institute for Geography, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Wetterkreuz 15, 91058 Erlangen, Germany)

  • Jonas Ostergaard Nielsen

    (Institute of Geography, Humboldt University of Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany
    Integrative Research Institute on Transformations of Human-Environment Systems, Humboldt University of Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany)

  • Tobia Lakes

    (Institute of Geography, Humboldt University of Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany
    Integrative Research Institute on Transformations of Human-Environment Systems, Humboldt University of Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

Land use planning as strategic instruments to guide urban dynamics faces particular challenges in the Global South, including Sub-Saharan Africa, where urgent interventions are required to improve urban and environmental sustainability. This study investigated and identified key challenges of land use planning and its environmental assessments to improve the urban and environmental sustainability of city-regions. In doing so, we combined expert interviews and questionnaires with spatial analyses of urban and regional land use plans, as well as current and future urban land cover maps derived from Geographic Information Systems and remote sensing. By overlaying and contrasting land use plans and land cover maps, we investigated spatial inconsistencies between urban and regional plans and the associated urban land dynamics and used expert surveys to identify the causes of such inconsistencies. We furthermore identified and interrogated key challenges facing land use planning, including its environmental assessment procedures, and explored means for overcoming these barriers to rapid, yet environmentally sound urban growth. The results illuminated multiple inconsistencies (e.g., spatial conflicts) between urban and regional plans, most prominently stemming from conflicts in administrative boundaries and a lack of interdepartmental coordination. Key findings identified a lack of Strategic Environmental Assessment and inadequate implementation of land use plans caused by e.g., insufficient funding, lack of political will, political interference, corruption as challenges facing land use planning strategies for urban and environmental sustainability. The baseline information provided in this study is crucial to improve strategic planning and urban/environmental sustainability of city-regions in Sub-Saharan Africa and across the Global South, where land use planning faces similar challenges to address haphazard urban expansion patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Evidence Chinedu Enoguanbhor & Florian Gollnow & Blake Byron Walker & Jonas Ostergaard Nielsen & Tobia Lakes, 2021. "Key Challenges for Land Use Planning and Its Environmental Assessments in the Abuja City-Region, Nigeria," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:5:p:443-:d:540541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/5/443/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/5/443/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mwathunga, Evance & Donaldson, Ronnie, 2018. "Urban land contestations, challenges and planning strategies in Malawi’s main urban centres," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-8.
    2. Calzolari, C. & Tarocco, P. & Lombardo, N. & Marchi, N. & Ungaro, F., 2020. "Assessing soil ecosystem services in urban and peri-urban areas: From urban soils survey to providing support tool for urban planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Singh, A. & Imtiyaz, M. & Isaac, R.K. & Denis, D.M., 2012. "Comparison of soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) artificial neural network for predicting sediment yield in the Nagwa agricultural watershed in Jharkhand, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 113-120.
    4. Swinton, Scott M. & Lupi, Frank & Robertson, G. Philip & Hamilton, Stephen K., 2007. "Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 245-252, December.
    5. Liu, Tao & Huang, Daquan & Tan, Xin & Kong, Fanhao, 2020. "Planning consistency and implementation in urbanizing China: Comparing urban and land use plans in suburban Beijing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. Li, Feixue & Li, Zhifeng & Chen, Honghua & Chen, Zhenjie & Li, Manchun, 2020. "An agent-based learning-embedded model (ABM-learning) for urban land use planning: A case study of residential land growth simulation in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Cobbinah, Patrick Brandful & Asibey, Michael Osei & Gyedu-Pensang, Yaa Asuamah, 2020. "Urban land use planning in Ghana: Navigating complex coalescence of land ownership and administration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Yen-Yu Wu & Hwong-Wen Ma, 2019. "Challenges for Integrating Strategic Environmental Assessment to Enhance Environmental Thinking: A Case Study of Taiwan Energy Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, January.
    9. Liang, Yue & Du, Mengbing & Wang, Xiangxiao & Xu, Xiwei, 2020. "Planning for urban life: A new approach of sustainable land use plan based on transit-oriented development," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    10. Evidence Chinedu Enoguanbhor & Florian Gollnow & Jonas Ostergaard Nielsen & Tobia Lakes & Blake Byron Walker, 2019. "Land Cover Change in the Abuja City-Region, Nigeria: Integrating GIS and Remotely Sensed Data to Support Land Use Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Phillips, Peter M. & João, Elsa, 2017. "Land use planning and the ecosystem approach: An evaluation of case study planning frameworks against the Malawi Principles," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 460-480.
    12. Maartje Bodde & Karin Van der Wel & Peter Driessen & Arjan Wardekker & Hens Runhaar, 2018. "Strategies for Dealing with Uncertainties in Strategic Environmental Assessment: An Analytical Framework Illustrated with Case Studies from The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sonia Delphin & Katherine A. Snyder & Sophia Tanner & Karim Musálem & Stuart E. Marsh & José R. Soto, 2022. "Obstacles to the Development of Integrated Land-Use Planning in Developing Countries: The Case of Paraguay," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Yi, Zhang & Zhou, Wenwu & Razzaq, Asif & Yang, Yao, 2023. "Land resource management and sustainable development: Evidence from China's regional data," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. Ramezani, Sara & Nastaran, Mahin & Nooraie, Homayoon & Otsuki, Kei, 2023. "The role of the institutional environment in land use planning in Iran: A conceptual framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    4. Fraol Udessa & Dagnachew Adugna & Liku Workalemahu, 2023. "Challenges to the Practice of Good Governance in Urban Land Use Planning: The Case of Two Selected Ethiopian Towns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriella Vindigni & Alexandros Mosca & Tommaso Bartoloni & Daniela Spina, 2021. "Shedding Light on Peri-Urban Ecosystem Services Using Automated Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Vermunt, D.A. & Wojtynia, N. & Hekkert, M.P. & Van Dijk, J. & Verburg, R. & Verweij, P.A. & Wassen, M. & Runhaar, H., 2022. "Five mechanisms blocking the transition towards ‘nature-inclusive’ agriculture: A systemic analysis of Dutch dairy farming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Valbuena, Diego & Tui, Sabine Homann-Kee & Erenstein, Olaf & Teufel, Nils & Duncan, Alan & Abdoulaye, Tahirou & Swain, Braja & Mekonnen, Kindu & Germaine, Ibro & Gérard, Bruno, 2015. "Identifying determinants, pressures and trade-offs of crop residue use in mixed smallholder farms in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 107-118.
    4. Smith, Helen F. & Sullivan, Caroline A., 2014. "Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes—Farmers' perceptions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 72-80.
    5. Shah, Syed Mahboob & Liu, Gengyuan & Yang, Qing & Casazza, Marco & Agostinho, Feni & Giannetti, Biagio F., 2021. "Sustainability assessment of agriculture production systems in Pakistan: A provincial-scale energy-based evaluation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    6. Wei Wu & Prasanna Divigalpitiya, 2022. "Assessment of Accessibility and Activity Intensity to Identify Future Development Priority TODs in Hefei City," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Rocío Silva-Pérez & Gema González-Romero, 2022. "GIAHS as an Instrument to Articulate the Landscape and Territorialized Agrifood Systems—The Example of La Axarquía (Malaga Province, Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Nils Droste & Bartosz Bartkowski, 2018. "Ecosystem Service Valuation for National Accounting: A Reply to Obst, Hein and Edens (2016)," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(1), pages 205-215, September.
    9. Laura Calvet-Mir & Hug March & Daniel Corbacho-Monné & Erik Gómez-Baggethun & Victoria Reyes-García, 2016. "Home Garden Ecosystem Services Valuation through a Gender Lens: A Case Study in the Catalan Pyrenees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Tao, Jieyi & Lu, Yuqi & Ge, Dazhuan & Dong, Ping & Gong, Xiao & Ma, Xiaobin, 2022. "The spatial pattern of agricultural ecosystem services from the production-living-ecology perspective: A case study of the Huaihai Economic Zone, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    11. Deng, Juntao & Pan, Shijia & Zhou, Mingu & Gao, Wen & Yan, Yuncai & Niu, Zijie & Han, Wenting, 2023. "Optimum sampling window size and vegetation index selection for low-altitude multispectral estimation of root soil moisture content for Xuxiang Kiwifruit," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    12. Pascual, Unai & Narloch, Ulf & Nordhagen, Stella & Drucker, Adam G., 2011. "The economics of agrobiodiversity conservation for food security under climate change," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 11(01), pages 1-30, November.
    13. repec:idb:brikps:64718 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Alamanos, Angelos & Koundouri, Phoebe, 2022. "Economics of Incorporating Ecosystem Services into Water Resource Planning and Management," MPRA Paper 122046, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Baskaran, Ramesh & Cullen, Ross & Colombo, Sergio, 2010. "Testing different types of benefit transfer in valuation of ecosystem services: New Zealand winegrowing case studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1010-1022, March.
    16. Addaney, Michael & Akudugu, Jonas Ayaribilla & Asibey, Michael Osei & Akaateba, Millicent Awialie & Kuusaana, Elias Danyi, 2022. "Changing land tenure regimes and women’s access to secure land for cocoa cultivation in rural Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    17. Adam Pawlewicz & Wojciech Gotkiewicz & Katarzyna Brodzińska & Katarzyna Pawlewicz & Bartosz Mickiewicz & Paweł Kluczek, 2022. "Organic Farming as an Alternative Maintenance Strategy in the Opinion of Farmers from Natura 2000 Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-22, March.
    18. Schleyer, Christian & Plieninger, Tobias, 2011. "Identifying obstacles to the design and implementation of payment schemes for ecosystem services provided through farm trees," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 115992, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Amare Tesfaw & Feyera Senbeta & Dawit Alemu & Ermias Teferi, 2022. "Estimating the Economic Values of Restricted Monoculture Eucalyptus Plantations: A Choice Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Jones, Sarah K. & Boundaogo, Mansour & DeClerck, Fabrice A. & Estrada-Carmona, Natalia & Mirumachi, Naho & Mulligan, Mark, 2019. "Insights into the importance of ecosystem services to human well-being in reservoir landscapes," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    21. Wang, Haoluan & Swallow, Brent M., 2017. "Linking Agricultural Land Conservation and Provision of Ecosystem Services: A Choice Experiment Approach," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258537, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:5:p:443-:d:540541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.