IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v46y2014i11p2670-2685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Search of Radical Democracy: The Ideological Character of Current Political Advocacies for Culture Change in Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Kristina Grange

    (Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture and Spatial Planning, PO Box 5003, NO-1432 Aas, Norway)

Abstract

This paper argues that current attempts to situate the crisis in planning in demoralised or old planning cultures are playing a key role in strengthening the ideological commitment of planning to an advanced liberal social order. In order to provide planners with the means to understand some of the ideological mechanisms at work in such processes, the 2007 Danish structural reform and the parallel advocacy for culture change in planning are analysed. Drawing on post-Marxist theories of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, the analysis draws attention to the need for reflection on whether the current ideological commitment of planning is that which best serves a democratic society.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristina Grange, 2014. "In Search of Radical Democracy: The Ideological Character of Current Political Advocacies for Culture Change in Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(11), pages 2670-2685, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:46:y:2014:i:11:p:2670-2685
    DOI: 10.1068/a130257p
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a130257p
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a130257p?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mario Reimer & Hans Blotevogel, 2012. "Comparing Spatial Planning Practice in Europe: A Plea for Cultural Sensitization," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 7-24.
    2. Vincent Nadin, 2012. "International Comparative Planning Methodology: Introduction to the Theme Issue," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 1-5.
    3. Frank Othengrafen & Mario Reimer, 2013. "The Embeddedness of Planning in Cultural Contexts: Theoretical Foundations for the Analysis of Dynamic Planning Cultures," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(6), pages 1269-1284, June.
    4. Loris Servillo & Pieter Van Den Broeck, 2012. "The Social Construction of Planning Systems: A Strategic-Relational Institutionalist Approach," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 41-61.
    5. Georgia Giannakourou, 2012. "The Europeanization of National Planning: Explaining the Causes and the Potentials of Change," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 117-135.
    6. Panagiotis Getimis, 2012. "Comparing Spatial Planning Systems and Planning Cultures in Europe. The Need for a Multi-scalar Approach," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 25-40.
    7. John Andersen & John Pløger, 2007. "The Dualism of Urban Governance in Denmark," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(10), pages 1349-1367, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mario Reimer, 2013. "Planning Cultures in Transition: Sustainability Management and Institutional Change in Spatial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(11), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Levin-Keitel, Meike & Sondermann, Martin, 2014. "Planerische Instrumente in lokalen Kontexten: Einblicke in die Vielfalt von Planungskulturen," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Grotheer, Swantje & Schwöbel, Arne & Stepper, Martina (ed.), Nimm's sportlich - Planung als Hindernislauf, volume 10, pages 172-191, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    3. Przemysław Śleszyński & Maciej Nowak & Paweł Sudra & Magdalena Załęczna & Małgorzata Blaszke, 2021. "Economic Consequences of Adopting Local Spatial Development Plans for the Spatial Management System: The Case of Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Živanović, Zora & Tošić, Branka & Berisha, Erblin & Perić, Ana, 2023. "An attempt to locate the Russian spatial planning system within the European planning families," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    5. Nowak, Maciej J. & Lozynskyy, Roman M. & Pantyley, Viktoriya, 2021. "Local spatial policy in Ukraine and Poland," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Suitner Johannes, 2014. "Cultures of Image Construction Approaching Planning Cultures as a Factor in Urban Image Production," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 21(1), pages 1-13, May.
    7. Auziņš Armands & Viesturs Jānis, 2017. "A Values-Led Planning Approach for Sustainable Land Use and Development," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 5(1), pages 275-286, November.
    8. Lasse Gerrits & Peter K Marks & Sofia Pagliarin & Ward Rauws, 2022. "Strategic archetypes of planning processes: Model and evidence," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(9), pages 2516-2530, November.
    9. Armands Auzins & Uchendu Eugene Chigbu, 2021. "Values-Led Planning Approach in Spatial Development: A Methodology," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Kukulska-Kozieł, Anita, 2023. "Buildable land overzoning. Have new planning regulations in Poland resolved the issue?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    11. Suškevičs, M. & Eiter, S. & Martinat, S. & Stober, D. & Vollmer, E. & de Boer, C.L. & Buchecker, M., 2019. "Regional variation in public acceptance of wind energy development in Europe: What are the roles of planning procedures and participation?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 311-323.
    12. Andy Inch, 2018. "‘Opening for business’? Neoliberalism and the cultural politics of modernising planning in Scotland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(5), pages 1076-1092, April.
    13. Małgorzata Blaszke & Iwona Foryś & Maciej J. Nowak & Bartosz Mickiewicz, 2022. "Selected Characteristics of Municipalities as Determinants of Enactment in Municipal Spatial Plans for Renewable Energy Sources—The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Márton Czirfusz, 2021. "The concept of solidarity in cohesion policies of the European Union and Hungary," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(5), pages 919-937, August.
    15. Kristian Olesen & Helen Carter, 2018. "Planning as a barrier for growth: Analysing storylines on the reform of the Danish Planning Act," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(4), pages 689-707, June.
    16. Niedziałkowski, Krzysztof & Beunen, Raoul, 2019. "The risky business of planning reform – The evolution of local spatial planning in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 11-20.
    17. Cattivelli, Valentina, 2020. "Planning peri-urban areas at regional level: The experience of Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna," MPRA Paper 101189, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Sofia Pagliarin, 2018. "Linking processes and patterns: Spatial planning, governance and urban sprawl in the Barcelona and Milan metropolitan regions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(16), pages 3650-3668, December.
    19. Dominic Stead & Jochem de Vries & Tuna Tasan-Kok, 2015. "Planning Cultures and Histories: Influences on the Evolution of Planning Systems and Spatial Development Patterns," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(11), pages 2127-2132, November.
    20. Nowak, Maciej J., 2019. "Funkcje narzędzi wykorzystywanych w polityce przestrzennej," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 6(3), pages 1-13, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:46:y:2014:i:11:p:2670-2685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.