IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i6p225-d1402811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diversification Is Not a Free Lunch

Author

Listed:
  • Dirk G. Baur

    (UWA Business School, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia)

Abstract

This study analyzed the statement “diversification is a free lunch”. We empirically showed that diversification is only a free lunch under uncertainty or ignorance, confirming Warren Buffett’s “diversification is protection against ignorance”. Using historical returns of the S&P500 constituents illustrated that diversification not only decreased the risk but also the returns if the expected returns could be estimated. The findings of this study highlight that diversification reduces risk but that the risk reduction is not for free.

Suggested Citation

  • Dirk G. Baur, 2024. "Diversification Is Not a Free Lunch," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:225-:d:1402811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/6/225/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/6/225/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zakamouline, Valeri & Koekebakker, Steen, 2009. "Portfolio performance evaluation with generalized Sharpe ratios: Beyond the mean and variance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1242-1254, July.
    2. Sergio Ortobelli Lozza, 2001. "The classification of parametric choices under uncertainty: analysis of the portfolio choice problem," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 297-328, December.
    3. Sergio Ortobelli Lozza & Wing-Keung Wong & Frank J. Fabozzi & Martin Egozcue, 2018. "Diversification versus optimality: is there really a diversification puzzle?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(43), pages 4671-4693, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kang, Yan-li & Tian, Jing-Song & Chen, Chen & Zhao, Gui-Yu & Li, Yuan-fu & Wei, Yu, 2021. "Entropy based robust portfolio," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    2. Lassance, Nathan & Vrins, Frédéric, 2021. "Portfolio selection with parsimonious higher comoments estimation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    3. Kerstens, Kristiaan & Mounir, Amine & de Woestyne, Ignace Van, 2011. "Non-parametric frontier estimates of mutual fund performance using C- and L-moments: Some specification tests," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 1190-1201, May.
    4. Hyungbin Park, 2021. "Modified Mean-Variance Risk Measures for Long-Term Portfolios," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Boudt, Kris & Raza, Muhammad Wajid & Wauters, Marjan, 2019. "Evaluating the Shariah-compliance of equity portfolios: The weighting method matters," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 406-417.
    6. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2018. "Big Data, Computational Science, Economics, Finance, Marketing, Management, and Psychology: Connections," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-29, March.
    7. Guidolin, Massimo & Hyde, Stuart, 2012. "Can VAR models capture regime shifts in asset returns? A long-horizon strategic asset allocation perspective," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 695-716.
    8. Niu, Cuizhen & Guo, Xu & McAleer, Michael & Wong, Wing-Keung, 2018. "Theory and application of an economic performance measure of risk," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 383-396.
    9. Benoît Carmichael & Gilles Boevi Koumou & Kevin Moran, 2021. "The RQE-CAPM : New insights about the pricing of idiosyncratic risk," CIRANO Working Papers 2021s-28, CIRANO.
    10. Irina Georgescu & Louis Aimé Fono, 2019. "A Portfolio Choice Problem in the Framework of Expected Utility Operators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Wing-Keung Wong & Hooi Hoi Lean & Michael McAleer & Feng-Tse Tsai, 2018. "Why did Warrant Markets Close in China but not Taiwan?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 18-051/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    12. Bahaji, Hamza & Aberkane, Salah, 2016. "How rational could VIX investing be?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 556-568.
    13. Hellman, Ziv & Schreiber, Amnon, 2018. "Indexing gamble desirability by extending proportional stochastic dominance," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 523-543.
    14. Eero P䴤ri & Mika Vilska, 2014. "Performance of moving average trading strategies over varying stock market conditions: the Finnish evidence," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(24), pages 2851-2872, August.
    15. Valeri Zakamouline, 2014. "Portfolio performance evaluation with loss aversion," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 699-710, April.
    16. E. Subha & V. Jothi Prakash & S. Arul Antran Vijay, 2025. "A novel arctic fox survival strategy inspired optimization algorithm," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 1-73, January.
    17. Mikl'os R'asonyi & Hasanjan Sayit, 2022. "Exponential utility maximization in small/large financial markets," Papers 2208.06549, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    18. Brandouy, Olivier & Briec, Walter & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Van de Woestyne, Ignace, 2010. "Portfolio performance gauging in discrete time using a Luenberger productivity indicator," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1899-1910, August.
    19. Guy Meunier, 2014. "Risk Aversion and Technology Portfolios," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 44(4), pages 347-365, June.
    20. Kim-Hung Pho & Tuan-Kiet Tran & Thi Diem-Chinh Ho & Wing-Keung Wong, 2019. "Optimal Solution Techniques in Decision Sciences A Review," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 23(1), pages 114-161, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:225-:d:1402811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.