IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i10p419-d920724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiplicative Methodology for Assessing Investment Attractiveness and Risk for Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Yulia Vertakova

    (Kursk Branch, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 125167 Moscow, Russia)

  • Maria Klevtsova

    (Department of Regional Economics and Management, South-West State University, 305000 Kursk, Russia)

  • Anna Zadimidchenko

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Surgut State Pedagogical University, 628400 Surgut, Russia)

Abstract

Creating favorable conditions for the development of industry is one of the key tasks with an increased level of complexity, the solution of which is associated with attracting investments and forming an investment policy that takes into account various specific characteristics of its implementation. However, modern science requires a deeper development of tools related to the study of the investment attractiveness of industries and the level of risk of investing in them, including taking into account market value factors. The purpose of this study is the development and practical approbation of a multiplicative methodology for assessing investment attractiveness and risk for individual industries. The methodological basis of the study was the scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists in the field of industrial and investment policy, its goals, tools for implementation and features of formation in individual industry complexes. The work also used the methods of structural-functional, economic-statistical, and comparative analysis, as well as tabular and graphical interpretation of empirical-factual information. The proposed methods for assessing investment attractiveness make it possible to take into account not only quantitatively measured indicators, but also more obscure indicators, which is especially important for obtaining a more complete result and can be used in conditions of limited access to information. As a result of this study, the most investment-attractive enterprises and a separate industry were identified, which at the initial stage should become the priorities of the industrial policy of the regions, since they are a kind of growth pole that can create a propulsive effect for the development of other enterprises and the territory as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulia Vertakova & Maria Klevtsova & Anna Zadimidchenko, 2022. "Multiplicative Methodology for Assessing Investment Attractiveness and Risk for Industries," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-9, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:419-:d:920724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/10/419/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/10/419/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erdal Demirhan & Mahmut Masca, 2008. "Determinants of foreign direct investment flows to developing countries: a cross-sectional analysis," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(4), pages 356-369.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hasan Yalçın, 2024. "Metric Conflict in Financial Analysis: A Comparison and Application of EBITDA and EVA," Muhasebe Enstitusu Dergisi - Journal of Accounting Institute, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 0(70), pages 39-57, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aneta Bobenič Hintošová & František Sudzina & Terézia Barlašová, 2021. "Direct and Indirect Effects of Investment Incentives in Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Husam Rjoub & Mehmet Aga & Ahmad Abu Alrub & Murad Bein, 2017. "Financial Reforms and Determinants of FDI: Evidence from Landlocked Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Aarón Garavito & Ana María Iregui & María Teresa Ramírez, 2014. "An Empirical Examination of the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Firm-Level Analysis for the Colombian Economy," Revista de Economía del Rosario, Universidad del Rosario, June.
    4. Nek Kamal Bin Yeop Yunus & Rashid Mohamed Saif, 2021. "Knowledge Management Process as a Predictor on Organizational Performance in Dubai Government Departments," European Journal of Marketing and Economics Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, EJME Janu.
    5. Zainab Jehan & Azooba Hamid, 2017. "Exchange rate volatility and capital inflows: role of financial development," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 16(3), pages 189-203, December.
    6. Hong, Seiwoong & Lee, Junyong & Oh, Frederick Dongchuhl & Shin, Donglim, 2023. "Religion and foreign direct investment," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(1).
    7. Mian Sajid Nazir & Qaisar Hafeez & Salah U‐Din, 2022. "Did reduction in corporate tax rate attract FDI in Pakistan?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 2256-2267, April.
    8. Muhammad Mahmud Mostafa, 2020. "Impacts of Inflation and Exchange Rate on Foreign Direct Investment in Bangladesh," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 4(11), pages 53-69.
    9. Muhammad Tariq Majeed & Eatzaz Ahmad, 2009. "An Analysis of Host Country Characteristics that Determine FDI in Developing Countries: Recent Panel Data Evidence," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 71-96, Jul-Dec.
    10. Malsha Mayoshi Rathnayaka Mudiyanselage & Gheorghe Epuran & Bianca Tescașiu, 2021. "Causal Links between Trade Openness and Foreign Direct Investment in Romania," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Blagica Petreski & Iva Trajkovska, 2018. "Bridging gaps and seizing potential: Domestic SMEs in the supply chain of multinational companies in the country," Finance Think Policy Studies 2018-11/19, Finance Think - Economic Research and Policy Institute.
    12. Jaworek, Małgorzata & Karaszewski, Włodzimierz & Szałucka, Małgorzata, 2021. "Ownership-Based Entry Mode Strategies and Limiting Factors of Foreign Direct Investment Undertaken by Polish Enterprises," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 26(3), pages 440-468.
    13. Horas Djulius, 2017. "Energy Use, Trade Openness, and Exchange Rate Impact on Foreign Direct Investment in Indonesia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(5), pages 166-170.
    14. Rao, R. Kavita & Tandon, Suranjali, 2015. "Designing Policies in the Presence of Hawala Markets," Working Papers 15/142, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    15. Raju Parakkal, 2019. "Economic Returns from Social and Political Globalization: Does Signaling Help Developing and Transition Countries to Attract Foreign Direct Investment?," ACTA VSFS, University of Finance and Administration, vol. 13(1), pages 8-28.
    16. Lenka Janíčková & Veronika Baranová, 2013. "Vliv efektivních daňových sazeb a jejich komponent na přímé zahraniční investice - případ členských zemí EU [Impact of Effective Tax Rates and Its Components on Foreign Direct Investment - The Case," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(2), pages 209-228.
    17. Zohaib AKHTAR* & Hafiz Muhammad YASIN**, 2015. "Terrorism and Political Instability Implications for Foreign Direct Investment: A Case Study of South and South East Asian Countries," Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, Applied Economics Research Centre, vol. 25(1), pages 67-98.
    18. W.M. Muli & J.O. Aduda, 2017. "The Mediating Effect of Ease of Doing Business on the Relationship between Economic Integration and Foreign Direct Investment in the East African Community," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 6(4), pages 1-2.
    19. Jan Tecl, 2017. "Labor Taxes and Decision about FDI in the EU," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(2), pages 41-54.
    20. Larissa Batrancea & Malar Mozhi Rathnaswamy & Ioan Batrancea, 2021. "A Panel Data Analysis of Economic Growth Determinants in 34 African Countries," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:419-:d:920724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.