IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i10p419-d920724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiplicative Methodology for Assessing Investment Attractiveness and Risk for Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Yulia Vertakova

    (Kursk Branch, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 125167 Moscow, Russia)

  • Maria Klevtsova

    (Department of Regional Economics and Management, South-West State University, 305000 Kursk, Russia)

  • Anna Zadimidchenko

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Surgut State Pedagogical University, 628400 Surgut, Russia)

Abstract

Creating favorable conditions for the development of industry is one of the key tasks with an increased level of complexity, the solution of which is associated with attracting investments and forming an investment policy that takes into account various specific characteristics of its implementation. However, modern science requires a deeper development of tools related to the study of the investment attractiveness of industries and the level of risk of investing in them, including taking into account market value factors. The purpose of this study is the development and practical approbation of a multiplicative methodology for assessing investment attractiveness and risk for individual industries. The methodological basis of the study was the scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists in the field of industrial and investment policy, its goals, tools for implementation and features of formation in individual industry complexes. The work also used the methods of structural-functional, economic-statistical, and comparative analysis, as well as tabular and graphical interpretation of empirical-factual information. The proposed methods for assessing investment attractiveness make it possible to take into account not only quantitatively measured indicators, but also more obscure indicators, which is especially important for obtaining a more complete result and can be used in conditions of limited access to information. As a result of this study, the most investment-attractive enterprises and a separate industry were identified, which at the initial stage should become the priorities of the industrial policy of the regions, since they are a kind of growth pole that can create a propulsive effect for the development of other enterprises and the territory as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulia Vertakova & Maria Klevtsova & Anna Zadimidchenko, 2022. "Multiplicative Methodology for Assessing Investment Attractiveness and Risk for Industries," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-9, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:419-:d:920724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/10/419/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/10/419/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erdal Demirhan & Mahmut Masca, 2008. "Determinants of foreign direct investment flows to developing countries: a cross-sectional analysis," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(4), pages 356-369.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hasan Yalçın, 2024. "Metric Conflict in Financial Analysis: A Comparison and Application of EBITDA and EVA," Muhasebe Enstitusu Dergisi - Journal of Accounting Institute, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 0(70), pages 39-57, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aneta Bobenič Hintošová & František Sudzina & Terézia Barlašová, 2021. "Direct and Indirect Effects of Investment Incentives in Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Nguyen Kim Phuoc, 2016. "Impacts of local characteristics on regional FDI inflows into Mekong Delta," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 6(1), pages 89-103.
    3. Shah, Mumtaz Hussain & Faiz, Mehreen, 2015. "Terrorism and Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Analysis of SAARC Countries," MPRA Paper 82008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Rathnayaka Mudiyanselage Malsha Mayoshi & Epuran Gheorghe, 2022. "The impact of trade openness on FDI inflows in Asian emerging economies," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 228-238, August.
    5. Yakubu, Ibrahim Nandom & Mikhail, Abdul Azeez, 2019. "Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Ghana: A Sectoral Analysis," MPRA Paper 95121, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Hoang, Thi Minh Hang & Nguyen, Thi Lan & Nguyen, Hoang My Linh & Phung, Thi Yen & Tran, Thi Lien Huong, 2014. "Labour provisions in preferential trade agreements: potential opportunities or challenges to Vietnam?," Papers 917, World Trade Institute.
    7. Husam Rjoub & Mehmet Aga & Ahmad Abu Alrub & Murad Bein, 2017. "Financial Reforms and Determinants of FDI: Evidence from Landlocked Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, January.
    8. Plaxedes Gochero & Seetanah Boopen, 2020. "The effect of mining foreign direct investment inflow on the economic growth of Zimbabwe," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. K. S. Sujit & B. Rajesh Kumar & Sarbjit Singh Oberoi, 2020. "Impact of Macroeconomic, Governance and Risk Factors on FDI Intensity—An Empirical Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Aarón Garavito & Ana María Iregui & María Teresa Ramírez, 2014. "An Empirical Examination of the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Firm-Level Analysis for the Colombian Economy," Revista de Economía del Rosario, Universidad del Rosario, June.
    11. Peter N. Kiriri, 2019. "Consumer Perception: Animosity, Ethnocentrism and Willingness to Buy Chinese Products," European Journal of Marketing and Economics Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, ejme_v2_i.
    12. Zainab Jehan & Azooba Hamid, 2017. "Exchange rate volatility and capital inflows: role of financial development," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 16(3), pages 189-203, December.
    13. Hong, Seiwoong & Lee, Junyong & Oh, Frederick Dongchuhl & Shin, Donglim, 2023. "Religion and foreign direct investment," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(1).
    14. Mian Sajid Nazir & Qaisar Hafeez & Salah U‐Din, 2022. "Did reduction in corporate tax rate attract FDI in Pakistan?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 2256-2267, April.
    15. Angus C. Chu & Guido Cozzi & Yuichi Furukawa & Chih‐Hsing Liao, 2019. "Inflation and Innovation in a Schumpeterian Economy with North–South Technology Transfer," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 51(2-3), pages 683-719, March.
    16. La-Bhus Fah Jirasavetakul & Jesmin Rahman, 2018. "Foreign Direct Investment in New Member State of the EU and Western Balkans: Taking Stock and Assessing Prospects," IMF Working Papers 2018/187, International Monetary Fund.
    17. Victor, Kidake, 2018. "Infrastructure and Foreign Direct Investment in Kenya: A Time Series Analysis 1980-2015," MPRA Paper 98014, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Muhammad Mahmud Mostafa, 2020. "Impacts of Inflation and Exchange Rate on Foreign Direct Investment in Bangladesh," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 4(11), pages 53-69.
    19. Yongrong Xin & Aftab Hussain Tabasam & Zhenling Chen & Aysha Zamir & Carlos Samuel Ramos-Meza, 2024. "Analyzing the Impact of Foreign Direct Investment, Energy Consumption on Services Exports, and Growth of the Services Sector: Evidence from SAARC Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 5709-5728, June.
    20. Muhammad Tariq Majeed & Eatzaz Ahmad, 2009. "An Analysis of Host Country Characteristics that Determine FDI in Developing Countries: Recent Panel Data Evidence," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 71-96, Jul-Dec.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:419-:d:920724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.