Author
Listed:
- Jiangshan Zhu
(School of Mathematics and Physics, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, 111 Ren’ai Road, Suzhou 215123, China)
- Rong Li
(School of Mathematics and Physics, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, 111 Ren’ai Road, Suzhou 215123, China)
- Zixuan Chen
(Management School, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZX, UK)
- Tiantian Zhang
(International Business School Suzhou, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, 111 Ren’ai Road, Suzhou 215123, China)
Abstract
This study explores the following two aspects: (i) the impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores and corporate ownership characteristics on the performance of Chinese listed companies, and (ii) whether different ownership characteristics (state-owned, private, foreign) moderate the relationship between ESG participation and corporate performance. By analyzing a comprehensive sample of 4649 listed companies in China, we provide robust evidence that ESG participation and its three pillars (i.e., Environmental, Social, and Governance) can significantly enhance corporate performance, as measured by the accounting-based proxy return on assets (ROA). Moreover, our research findings reveal an important and novel discovery: in the Chinese market, ownership types have significantly different moderating effects on the relationship between ESG and corporate performance. Specifically, compared to state-owned enterprises and private corporations, foreign ownership exhibits a stronger moderating effect in enhancing the positive impact of ESG on ROA, followed by private corporations, while the moderating effect of state-owned enterprises is the weakest. This result provides new perspectives and empirical support on how ESG and ownership structure jointly affect corporate performance, offering references for future related research and policy formulation.
Suggested Citation
Jiangshan Zhu & Rong Li & Zixuan Chen & Tiantian Zhang, 2025.
"Does Ownership Structure Influence the Financial Performance of Chinese Listed Companies? An Analysis of ESG Practices and Accounting-Based Outcomes,"
IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-29, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:48-:d:1620870
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:48-:d:1620870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.