IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i10p1348-d1496754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Importance of Types and Characteristics of Support to Informal Caregivers among Spouse Caregivers of Persons with Dementia in Sweden: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire-Based Study

Author

Listed:
  • Marcus F. Johansson

    (School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, 791 88 Falun, Sweden)

  • Kevin J. McKee

    (School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, 791 88 Falun, Sweden)

  • Lena Dahlberg

    (School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, 791 88 Falun, Sweden
    Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm University, 171 65 Solna, Sweden)

  • Christine L. Williams

    (Christine E Lynn College of Nursing, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA)

  • Lena Marmstål Hammar

    (School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, 721 23 Västerås, Sweden)

Abstract

Informal caregivers play a crucial role in the care of individuals with dementia, and their caregiving may significantly impact their own health and well-being. This cross-sectional survey study focuses on the perceived importance of various types and characteristics of formal support in a convenience sample of caregivers aged 65 years or older (N = 175) caring for a spouse with dementia. Participants completed a questionnaire containing 17 items describing different types of support and 12 items describing different characteristics of support, rating their importance. The questionnaire also contained questions on various caregiving-related factors. Principle components analysis (PCA) was carried out on the importance ratings, separately, on the types of support items and the characteristics of support items. Each PCA produced three components. For types of support, they were Proficiency and Opportunity, Supportive Structures, Flexible Counselling. For characteristics of support, they included Respectful and Competent, Timely Support, and Accessible and Acceptable. The three characteristics of the support components all had higher mean importance ratings than the three types of support components. The content of some components indicated that while spouse caregivers rate support for their caregiving needs as important, they may not always differentiate their own needs from those of their partner with dementia. The negative impact of caregiving was the factor most strongly and consistently associated with the components’ importance ratings. This study emphasizes the need for health and social care providers to address the unique needs of spouse caregivers while simultaneously ensuring the delivery of quality care for individuals with dementia.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcus F. Johansson & Kevin J. McKee & Lena Dahlberg & Christine L. Williams & Lena Marmstål Hammar, 2024. "Perceived Importance of Types and Characteristics of Support to Informal Caregivers among Spouse Caregivers of Persons with Dementia in Sweden: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire-Based Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(10), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:10:p:1348-:d:1496754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/10/1348/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/10/1348/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. André Hajek & Benedikt Kretzler & Hans-Helmut König, 2021. "Informal Caregiving, Loneliness and Social Isolation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Marcus F. Johansson & Kevin J. McKee & Lena Dahlberg & Martina Summer Meranius & Christine L. Williams & Lena Marmstål Hammar, 2022. "Negative Impact and Positive Value of Caregiving in Spouse Carers of Persons with Dementia in Sweden," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-13, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adèle Gauthier & Cécile Lagarde & France Mourey & Patrick Manckoundia, 2022. "Use of Digital Tools, Social Isolation, and Lockdown in People 80 Years and Older Living at Home," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-18, March.
    2. David McDaid & A-La Park, 2022. "Understanding the Economic Value and Impacts on Informal Carers of People Living with Mental Health Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Katharina Dost & Fabian Heinrich & Wiebke Graf & Anna Brennecke & Veronika Kowalski & Anna Leider & Anika Kraus & Victoria van Rüth & Benjamin Ondruschka & Klaus Püschel & Hans-Helmut König & Franzisk, 2022. "Predictors of Loneliness among Homeless Individuals in Germany during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-11, October.
    4. Andrew Wormald & Eimear McGlinchey & Maureen D’Eath & Iracema Leroi & Brian Lawlor & Philip McCallion & Mary McCarron & Roger O’Sullivan & Yaohua Chen, 2023. "Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Caregivers of People with an Intellectual Disability, in Comparison to Carers of Those with Other Disabilities and with Mental Health Issues: A Multicountry Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Isabelle von Saenger & Lena Dahlberg & Erika Augustsson & Johan Fritzell & Carin Lennartsson, 2023. "Will your child take care of you in your old age? Unequal caregiving received by older parents from adult children in Sweden," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Pablo De Gea Grela & Diego Sánchez-González & Lorena Patricia Gallardo Peralta, 2024. "Urban and Rural Environments and Their Implications for Older Adults’ Adaptation to Heat Waves: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-29, August.
    7. Edward J D & David Meads & Clare Gardiner, 2023. "The informal carer experience during the COVID-19 pandemic: mental health, loneliness, and financial (in)-security," Oxford Open Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 2, pages 428-442.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:10:p:1348-:d:1496754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.