IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2242-d1047802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acceptability of School Menus: A Systematic Review of Assessment Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Síntia Almeida Santana

    (Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Sueny Andrade Batista

    (Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Dayanne da Costa Maynard

    (Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Verônica Cortez Ginani

    (Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Renata Puppin Zandonadi

    (Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho

    (Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

Abstract

The school meal promotes healthy eating habits through nutritionally adequate preparations. Consequently, it prevents obesity and malnutrition, favoring learning. This systematic review aimed at investigating the methods for evaluating the acceptance of school menus offered by school feeding programs (SFPs) around the world. Specific search strategies were conducted on PubMed, Lilacs, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, and ProQuest Global. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Meta-Analysis Statistical Assessment and Review Instrument. A total of 89 studies were included. The countries with the highest number of studies were Brazil ( n = 42), South Korea ( n = 13), and the United States ( n = 12). The most used methods (69.66%) were numerical scales, with a higher prevalence for the 5-point scale (50.56%). Other methods included questionnaires and/or interviews with objective and/or subjective questions (44.94%); and mathematical formulas and/or visual estimates evaluating the consumption of food and leftovers (40.45%). The prevalent use of the 5-point hedonic scale may be due to its low cost, simplicity, ease of elaboration, application speed, and student understanding. Mathematical formulas and/or visual estimation were used by about 40% of the studies, but it is difficult to compare studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Síntia Almeida Santana & Sueny Andrade Batista & Dayanne da Costa Maynard & Verônica Cortez Ginani & Renata Puppin Zandonadi & Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho, 2023. "Acceptability of School Menus: A Systematic Review of Assessment Methods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-48, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2242-:d:1047802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2242/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2242/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicoletta Favuzzi & Paolo Trerotoli & Maria Grazia Forte & Nicola Bartolomeo & Gabriella Serio & Domenico Lagravinese & Francesco Vino, 2020. "Evaluation of an Alimentary Education Intervention on School Canteen Waste at a Primary School in Bari, Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Maietta, Ornella Wanda & Gorgitano, Maria Teresa, 2016. "School meals and pupil satisfaction. Evidence from Italian primary schools," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 41-55.
    3. Jillian M. Joyce & Kyleen Harris & Emily L. Mailey & Richard R. Rosenkranz & Sara K. Rosenkranz, 2020. "Acceptability and Feasibility of Best Practice School Lunches by Elementary School-Aged Children in a Serve Setting: A Randomized Crossover Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-25, August.
    4. Luca Falasconi & Matteo Vittuari & Alessandro Politano & Andrea Segrè, 2015. "Food Waste in School Catering: An Italian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Alessandra Cupertino & Veronica Ginani & Ana Paula Cupertino & Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho, 2022. "School Feeding Programs: What Happens Globally?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Donald Bundy & Carmen Burbano & Margaret Grosh & Aulo Gelli & Matthew Jukes & Lesley Drake, 2009. "Rethinking School Feeding Social Safety Nets, Child Development, and the Education Sector," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2634.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge Coque & Pilar L. González-Torre, 2017. "Adapting Nonprofit Resources to New Social Demands: The Food Banks in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Viviany Moura Chaves & Cecília Rocha & Sávio Marcelino Gomes & Michelle Cristine Medeiros Jacob & João Bosco Araújo da Costa, 2023. "Integrating Family Farming into School Feeding: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Potential Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Ryan Nehring & Ana Carla Miranda & Andrew Howe, 2017. "A case for institutional demand as effective social protection: supporting smallholders through procurement and food assistance programmes," Working Papers 157, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    4. Chakraborty, Tanika & Jayaraman, Rajshri, 2019. "School feeding and learning achievement: Evidence from India's midday meal program," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 249-265.
    5. Karin Höijer & Caroline Lindö & Arwa Mustafa & Maria Nyberg & Viktoria Olsson & Elisabet Rothenberg & Hanna Sepp & Karin Wendin, 2020. "Health and Sustainability in Public Meals—An Explorative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Christopher Malefors & Pieter Callewaert & Per-Anders Hansson & Hanna Hartikainen & Oona Pietiläinen & Ingrid Strid & Christina Strotmann & Mattias Eriksson, 2019. "Towards a Baseline for Food-Waste Quantification in the Hospitality Sector—Quantities and Data Processing Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-22, June.
    7. Matteo Vittuari & Fabio De Menna & Silvia Gaiani & Luca Falasconi & Alessandro Politano & Jana Dietershagen & Andrea Segrè, 2017. "The Second Life of Food: An Assessment of the Social Impact of Food Redistribution Activities in Emilia Romagna, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Jingru Ren & Xiaodong Zheng & Rodney Smith & Xiangming Fang, 2023. "School feeding program and urban–rural inequality of child health: Evidence from China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(S1), pages 1399-1416, December.
    9. Mr. Daouda Sembene, 2015. "Poverty, Growth, and Inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Did the Walk Match the Talk under the PRSP Approach?," IMF Working Papers 2015/122, International Monetary Fund.
    10. Aleksander Buczacki & Bartłomiej Gładysz & Erika Palmer, 2021. "HoReCa Food Waste and Sustainable Development Goals—A Systemic View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.
    11. Logedi Josephine Chahilu & Mary Jebii Chemagosi (PhD) & Sellah Lusweti (PhD), 2022. "Influence of the School Feeding Programme on educational outcomes of pupils in public pre-primary schools in Mombasa County, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(02), pages 247-254, February.
    12. Audrey Elford & Cherice Gwee & Maliney Veal & Rati Jani & Ros Sambell & Shabnam Kashef & Penelope Love, 2022. "Identification and Evaluation of Tools Utilised for Measuring Food Provision in Childcare Centres and Primary Schools: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-37, March.
    13. Harold Alderman & Daniel O. Gilligan & Kim Lehrer, 2012. "The Impact of Food for Education Programs on School Participation in Northern Uganda," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 61(1), pages 187-218.
    14. Lorenzo Compagnucci & Alessio Cavicchi & Francesca Spigarelli & Lorenza Natali, 2018. "A multi-stakeholder attempt to address food waste: The case of Wellfood Action EU project," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 20(3), pages 503-528.
    15. Adriana Antón-Peset & Maria-Angeles Fernandez-Zamudio & Tatiana Pina, 2021. "Promoting Food Waste Reduction at Primary Schools. A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Lawson, Ty M., 2012. "Impact of School Feeding Programs on Educational, Nutritional, and Agricultural Development Goals: A Systematic Review of Literature," Graduate Research Master's Degree Plan B Papers 142466, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    17. Elena Pagliarino & Elena Santanera & Greta Falavigna, 2021. "Opportunities for and Limits to Cooperation between School and Families in Sustainable Public Food Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Sujata Balasubramanian, 2015. "Is the PDS Already a Cash Transfer? Rethinking India's Food Subsidy Policies," HKUST IEMS Working Paper Series 2015-16, HKUST Institute for Emerging Market Studies, revised Mar 2015.
    19. Borish, David & King, Nia & Dewey, Cate, 2017. "Enhanced community capital from primary school feeding and agroforestry program in Kenya," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 10-18.
    20. Rogério João Lunkes & Fabricia Silva da Rosa & Pamela Lattanzi, 2020. "The Effect of the Perceived Utility of a Management Control System with a Broad Scope on the Use of Food Waste Information and on Financial and Non-Financial Performances in Restaurants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2242-:d:1047802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.