IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p1484-d1035013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deciding Alone or with Others: Employment Anxiety and Social Distance Predict Intuitiveness in Career Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoli Shu

    (School of Education Science, Hanshan Normal University, Chaozhou 521041, China
    School of Education, Research Institute of Macau Education Development, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China)

  • Jun Peng

    (School of Education, Research Institute of Macau Education Development, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China)

  • Guilin Wang

    (School of Education Science, Hanshan Normal University, Chaozhou 521041, China)

Abstract

Intuitive career decisions can influence people’s career choices and subsequent job competencies, which are related to their development and happiness. There is evidence that both anxiety and social distance influence intuitive career decisions individually, but it is unclear how employment anxiety and social distance influence intuitive career decisions individually and how they interact to influence intuitive career decisions. Drawing on the cognitive–emotional dual-system model, in this study, 298 college students and 386 senior job-seeking students were tested through behavioral experiments and questionnaires, respectively. The results showed that employment anxious individuals have a higher intuitive level in career decision making, and they also have a higher intuitive level when making career decisions for others at a far social distance. In addition, employment anxiety and social distance interact to influence the intuitiveness of career decision making. When making career decisions for themselves and those who are close to them, the increase in employment anxiety will increase the intuitive level. Therefore, in a non-anxious situation, you can make career decisions on your own or get help from someone close to you, but in anxious situations, you can turn to others who are at a far social distance to help make decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoli Shu & Jun Peng & Guilin Wang, 2023. "Deciding Alone or with Others: Employment Anxiety and Social Distance Predict Intuitiveness in Career Decision Making," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1484-:d:1035013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1484/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1484/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:11:y:2016:i:4:p:332-341 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Keith A. Puffer & Kris G. Pence, 2020. "Behind Dislike: Adaptive Purposes for Undergraduates’ Negative Emotions in the Career Decision-Making Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Lawrence E. Williams & Randy Stein & Laura Galguera, 2014. "The Distinct Affective Consequences of Psychological Distance and Construal Level," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(6), pages 1123-1138.
    4. Antoni Castelló & Ramon Cladellas, 2021. "Assessment of Implicit Interests through an Unobtrusive Computer Task. Their Relations with Career Decision, Anxiety, and Personality Traits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Kim, Hyunji & Schnall, Simone, 2021. "Profit for friends, fairness for strangers: Social distance reverses the endowment effect in proxy decision making," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariela E Jaffé & Rainer Greifeneder & Marc-André Reinhard, 2019. "Manipulating the odds: The effects of Machiavellianism and construal level on cheating behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Poushneh, Atieh, 2021. "How close do we feel to virtual product to make a purchase decision? Impact of perceived proximity to virtual product and temporal purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Prashanth Ravula, 2023. "Impact of delivery performance on online review ratings: the role of temporal distance of ratings," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(2), pages 149-159, June.
    4. Wei Wu & Qianwen Yang & Xiang Gong, 2024. "Impulsive Social Shopping in Social Commerce Platforms: The Role of Perceived Proximity," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1527-1541, August.
    5. Jie, Yun & Li, Ye, 2022. "Chronological cues and consumers’ preference for mere newness," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 527-541.
    6. David L. Alexander & Ashley Stadler Blank, 2018. "Besting the status quo: the effect of abstract versus concrete mindsets on emotional trade-off difficulty and avoidant coping behavior," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 351-362, September.
    7. Mariela E Jaffé & Maria Douneva, 2020. "Secretive and close? How sharing secrets may impact perceptions of distance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Ryan S Elder & Ann E Schlosser & Morgan Poor & Lidan Xu & Darren DahlEditor & JoAndrea HoeggAssociate Editor, 2017. "So Close I Can Almost Sense It: The Interplay between Sensory Imagery and Psychological Distance," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 877-894.
    9. Reichert, Michael Justus & Fantapié-Altobelli, Claudia, 2016. "Country-of-origin effects in industrial goods markets: Do country-of-origin image effects differ for different buying center members?," jbm - Journal of Business Market Management, Free University Berlin, Marketing Department, vol. 9(2), pages 623-649.
    10. Florence Jeannot & Eline Jongmans & Maud Dampérat, 2022. "Visual design and online shopping experiences: When expertise allows consumers to refocus on website attractiveness," Post-Print halshs-04159592, HAL.
    11. Chan, Eugene Y. & Meng, Yan, 2023. "They’re vs They Are: Contractions influence product choice and judgments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. repec:fan:istois:v:html10.3280/isto2023-047002 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Herter, Márcia Maurer & Borges, Adilson & Pinto, Diego Costa, 2021. "Which emotions make you healthier? The effects of sadness, embarrassment, and construal level on healthy behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 147-158.
    14. Chatterjee, Swagato & Kittur, Prathamesh & Vishwakarma, Pankaj & Dey, Anirban, 2023. "What makes customers of airport lounges satisfied and more? Impact of culture and travel class," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. Lili Wang & Maferima Touré-Tillery & Ann L. McGill, 2023. "The effect of disease anthropomorphism on compliance with health recommendations," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 266-285, March.
    16. Junzhou Zhang & Yuping Liu-Thompkins, 2024. "Personalized email marketing in loyalty programs: The role of multidimensional construal levels," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 196-216, January.
    17. Ran Duan & Christian Bombara, 2022. "Visualizing climate change: the role of construal level, emotional valence, and visual literacy," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 1-22, January.
    18. Erita Narhetali & Magdalena Smyk & Marek Weretka, 2023. "Empathy in risky choices regarding others," GRAPE Working Papers 91, GRAPE Group for Research in Applied Economics.
    19. Septianto, Felix & Lee, Michael SW. & Putra, Pragea Geldoffy, 2021. "Everyday “low price†or everyday “value†? The interactive effects of framing and construal level on consumer purchase intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    20. Nguyen, Stephanie & Didi Alaoui, Mohamed & Llosa, Sylvie, 2020. "When interchangeability between providers and users makes a difference: The mediating role of social proximity in collaborative services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 506-515.
    21. Jürgen Neumann & Dominik Gutt & Dennis Kundisch, 2021. "Reviewing from a Distance: Uncovering the Negativity Bias of Psychological Distance in Online Word-of-Mouth," Working Papers Dissertations 78, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1484-:d:1035013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.