IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v156y2023ics0148296322009286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

They’re vs They Are: Contractions influence product choice and judgments

Author

Listed:
  • Chan, Eugene Y.
  • Meng, Yan

Abstract

Contractions are common in both written and spoken English. For example, it is common to use “they’re” instead of “they are.” Contractions are also popular in marketing communications and ad copy. However, despite the popularity of contractions, there is no existing work on how their use can influence individuals’ information processing. Given that language—not just the text but also linguistic forms—can exert an influence on information processing, the possibility that contractions might also do so warrants investigation. Across three experiments, we examine the effect of contractions on consumers’ product choices and judgments. We find that contractions increase choice for products that are higher on feasibility (vs desirability) and those with secondary (vs primary) features while they decreased intentions to engage in COVID-protection behaviors that would be high on feasibility. These effects are consistent with greater concrete thinking. Thus, we situate our research within Construal Level Theory to propose that contractions have an effect on individuals’ cognition, which we demonstrate in consumption-relevant settings. Our work contributes to marketing theory and practice. But, since our effect is novel, in our General Discussion, we also highlight limitations to our work and offer suggestions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Chan, Eugene Y. & Meng, Yan, 2023. "They’re vs They Are: Contractions influence product choice and judgments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:156:y:2023:i:c:s0148296322009286
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322009286
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun, Jin & Keh, Hean Tat & Lee, Angela Y., 2019. "Shaping consumer preference using alignable attributes: The roles of regulatory orientation and construal level," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 151-168.
    2. Kiyoung Chang & Ying Li & Ha‐Chin Yi, 2021. "Informed equity ownership and bank loan contracting," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(7-8), pages 1368-1403, July.
    3. Lawrence E. Williams & Randy Stein & Laura Galguera, 2014. "The Distinct Affective Consequences of Psychological Distance and Construal Level," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(6), pages 1123-1138.
    4. Carnevale, Marina & Luna, David & Lerman, Dawn, 2017. "Brand linguistics: A theory-driven framework for the study of language in branding," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 572-591.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tan, Fuqiang & Li, Xi & Agarwal, Reeti & Joshi, Yatish & Yaqub, Muhammad Zafar, 2024. "Does multilingual packaging influence purchasing in retail segment? Evidence from multiple experiments," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Poushneh, Atieh, 2021. "How close do we feel to virtual product to make a purchase decision? Impact of perceived proximity to virtual product and temporal purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Kirshner, Samuel N., 2024. "GPT and CLT: The impact of ChatGPT's level of abstraction on consumer recommendations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    4. Wei Wu & Qianwen Yang & Xiang Gong, 2024. "Impulsive Social Shopping in Social Commerce Platforms: The Role of Perceived Proximity," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1527-1541, August.
    5. David L. Alexander & Ashley Stadler Blank, 2018. "Besting the status quo: the effect of abstract versus concrete mindsets on emotional trade-off difficulty and avoidant coping behavior," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 351-362, September.
    6. Jihoon Cho & Swinder Janda, 2023. "Perception carryover in cross-buying: the role of interpurchase time and product locus," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(4), pages 809-819, December.
    7. Florence Jeannot & Eline Jongmans & Maud Dampérat, 2022. "Visual design and online shopping experiences: When expertise allows consumers to refocus on website attractiveness," Post-Print halshs-04159592, HAL.
    8. repec:fan:istois:v:html10.3280/isto2023-047002 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Herter, Márcia Maurer & Borges, Adilson & Pinto, Diego Costa, 2021. "Which emotions make you healthier? The effects of sadness, embarrassment, and construal level on healthy behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 147-158.
    10. Khenfer, Jamel & Cuny, Caroline, 2020. "Brand preference in the face of control loss and service failure: The role of the sound of brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    11. Jamel Khenfer & Caroline Cuny, 2021. "How to project action through the sound of brand names?," Post-Print hal-03189336, HAL.
    12. Lili Wang & Maferima Touré-Tillery & Ann L. McGill, 2023. "The effect of disease anthropomorphism on compliance with health recommendations," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 266-285, March.
    13. Martin Reisenbichler & Thomas Reutterer & David A. Schweidel & Daniel Dan, 2022. "Frontiers: Supporting Content Marketing with Natural Language Generation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 441-452, May.
    14. Junzhou Zhang & Yuping Liu-Thompkins, 2024. "Personalized email marketing in loyalty programs: The role of multidimensional construal levels," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 196-216, January.
    15. Ran Duan & Christian Bombara, 2022. "Visualizing climate change: the role of construal level, emotional valence, and visual literacy," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 1-22, January.
    16. Abe, Makoto & Kaneko, Mitsuru, 2022. "Preference reversal: Analysis using construal level theory that incorporates discounting," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    17. Xiaoli Shu & Jun Peng & Guilin Wang, 2023. "Deciding Alone or with Others: Employment Anxiety and Social Distance Predict Intuitiveness in Career Decision Making," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Erita Narhetali & Magdalena Smyk & Marek Weretka, 2023. "Empathy in risky choices regarding others," GRAPE Working Papers 91, GRAPE Group for Research in Applied Economics.
    19. Septianto, Felix & Lee, Michael SW. & Putra, Pragea Geldoffy, 2021. "Everyday “low price†or everyday “value†? The interactive effects of framing and construal level on consumer purchase intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    20. Jürgen Neumann & Dominik Gutt & Dennis Kundisch, 2021. "Reviewing from a Distance: Uncovering the Negativity Bias of Psychological Distance in Online Word-of-Mouth," Working Papers Dissertations 78, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    21. Didi Alaoui, Mohamed & Valette-Florence, Pierre & Cova, Véronique, 2022. "How psychological distance shapes hedonic consumption: The moderating role of the need to justify," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 57-69.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:156:y:2023:i:c:s0148296322009286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.