IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p1446-d1034328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dilemma and Path of Rural Environmental Governance in China: From the Perspective of a Community with a Shared Future

Author

Listed:
  • Yigang Zhang

    (School of Law, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276800, China)

  • Xiaoyan Guo

    (School of Law, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276800, China)

Abstract

With the aim of achieving the goal of ecological livability in Chinese rural society, the issue of rural environmental governance has received great attention from the CCP and the government. However, due to local governments’ model of development in exchange for economic interests and the “urban and rural binary” structure of environmental governance, rural environmental governance faces many dilemmas, such as lack of normative standards, lack of environmental governance subjects, and lack of judicial security. In order to improve the development of rural ecological civilization and realize ecologically friendly agriculture, this paper proposes a solution path for rural environmental governance from the perspective of the idea of the community with a shared future for humanity. Specifically, this solution path includes establishing the concepts of cooperation and governance of environmental protection, improving villagers’ participation in environmental protection, balancing economic and environmental interests in rural environmental governance, and building a long-term mechanism for the rule of law in rural environmental governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Yigang Zhang & Xiaoyan Guo, 2023. "The Dilemma and Path of Rural Environmental Governance in China: From the Perspective of a Community with a Shared Future," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1446-:d:1034328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1446/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1446/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berit Hasler & Mette Termansen & Helle Ørsted Nielsen & Carsten Daugbjerg & Sven Wunder & Uwe Latacz-Lohmann, 2022. "European Agri-environmental Policy: Evolution, Effectiveness, and Challenges," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(1), pages 105-125.
    2. Na Lu & Kira M. Villa, 2022. "Agricultural support and contaminated spillovers: The effects of agricultural water pollution on adult health in China," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(2), pages 788-821, June.
    3. Urs Fischbacher & Simon Gachter, 2010. "Social Preferences, Beliefs, and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(1), pages 541-556, March.
    4. John T. Scholz & Cheng‐Lung Wang, 2006. "Cooptation or Transformation? Local Policy Networks and Federal Regulatory Enforcement," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(1), pages 81-97, January.
    5. Margaretha Wewerinke-Singh & Curtis Doebbler, 2022. "Protecting Human Health from Climate Change: Legal Obligations and Avenues of Redress under International Law," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, April.
    6. Lee Liu, 2019. "Rural–urban inequities in deaths and cancer mortality amid rapid economic and environmental changes in China," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(1), pages 39-48, January.
    7. Zheng, Shiming & Yao, Rongrong & Zou, Ke, 2022. "Provincial environmental inequality in China: Measurement, influence, and policy instrument choice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    8. Yan Chen & Sherry Xin Li, 2009. "Group Identity and Social Preferences," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(1), pages 431-457, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongzhen Zhang & Jingyang Yu & Yakun Chen, 2024. "Party Branch Embeddedness and Urban–Rural Environmental Inequality: Self-Regulation or Pollution Shelter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Qianwen Wu & Qiangqiang Wang & Yongwu Dai, 2023. "Analysis of Strategy Selection in Third-Party Governance of Rural Environmental Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Xiaoyan Zhang & Qing Yang & Abdullah Al Mamun & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Muhammad Mehedi Masud, 2024. "Acceptance of new agricultural technology among small rural farmers," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Liz Maribel Robladillo Bravo & Ricardo Fernando Cosio Borda & Luis Alberto Marcelo Quispe & James Arístides Pajuelo Rodríguez & Józef Ober & Nisar Ahmed Khan, 2024. "The Role of Internet and Social Interactions in Advancing Waste Sorting Behaviors in Rural Communities," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Keming Huang & Fangzhou Xia, 2023. "Classification of Rural Relative Poverty Groups and Measurement of the Influence of Land Elements: A Questionnaire-Based Analysis of 23 Poor Counties in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Kai Xu, 2023. "Challenges, Opportunities and Future Paths: Environmental Governance of Big Data Initiatives in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin G. Kocher & Fangfang Tan & Jing Yu, 2018. "Providing Global Public Goods: Electoral Delegation And Cooperation," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(1), pages 381-397, January.
    2. Sun-Ki Chai & Dolgorsuren Dorj & Katerina Sherstyuk, 2018. "Cultural Values and Behavior in Dictator, Ultimatum, and Trust Games: An Experimental Study," Research in Experimental Economics, in: Experimental Economics and Culture, volume 20, pages 89-166, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    3. Drouvelis, Michalis & Malaeb, Bilal & Vlassopoulos, Michael & Wahba, Jackline, 2021. "Cooperation in a fragmented society: Experimental evidence on Syrian refugees and natives in Lebanon," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 176-191.
    4. Thorsten Chmura & Christoph Engel & Markus Englerth, 2013. "Selfishness As a Potential Cause of Crime. A Prison Experiment," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2013_05, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    5. Bicchieri, Cristina & Dimant, Eugen & Gächter, Simon & Nosenzo, Daniele, 2022. "Social proximity and the erosion of norm compliance," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 59-72.
    6. Kreitmair, Ursula & Bower-Bir, Jacob, 2021. "Too different to solve climate change? Experimental evidence on the effects of production and benefit heterogeneity on collective action," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Tjaša Bjedov & Simon Lapointe & Thierry Madiès & Marie Claire Villeval, 2018. "Does decentralization of decisions increase the stability of large groups?," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(4), pages 681-716, December.
    8. Weng, Qian & Carlsson, Fredrik, 2015. "Cooperation in teams: The role of identity, punishment, and endowment distribution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 25-38.
    9. Tobias Regner & Gerhard Riener, 2011. "Motivational Cherry Picking," Jena Economics Research Papers 2011-029, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    10. Hermes, Henning & Hett, Florian & Mechtel, Mario & Schmidt, Felix & Schunk, Daniel & Wagner, Valentin, 2020. "Do children cooperate conditionally? Adapting the strategy method for first-graders," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 638-652.
    11. Danilov, Anastasia & Harbring, Christine & Irlenbusch, Bernd, 2014. "Helping in Teams," IZA Discussion Papers 8707, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Ola Andersson & Marieke Huysentruyt & Topi Miettinen & Ute Stephan, 2017. "Person–Organization Fit and Incentives: A Causal Test," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 73-96, January.
    13. Horstmann, Elaine & Blankenberg, Ann-Kathrin & Schneider, Tim, 2017. "Cooperation in public goods games: Enhancing effects of group identity and competition," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 324, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    14. Cobo–Reyes, Ramon & Dominguez, Jose J. & García–Quero, Fernando & Grosskopf, Brit & Lacomba, Juan A. & Lagos, Francisco & Liu, Tracy Xiao & Pearce, Graeme, 2020. "The development of social preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 653-666.
    15. Wladislaw Mill & John Morgan, 2022. "The cost of a divided America: an experimental study into destructive behavior," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(3), pages 974-1001, June.
    16. Sherstyuk, Katerina & Tarui, Nori & Wengrin, Melinda Podor & Viloria, Jay & Saijo, Tatsuyoshi, 2014. "Other-regarding behavior under collective action," CEI Working Paper Series 2014-2, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    17. Johannes Weisser, 2012. "Leading by example in intergroup competition: An experimental approach," Jena Economics Research Papers 2011-067, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    18. Lankau, Matthias & Bicskei, Marianna & Bizer, Kilian, 2012. "Cooperation preferences in the provision of public goods: An experimental study on the effects of social identity," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 148, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    19. Weisel, Ori & Zultan, Ro׳i, 2016. "Social motives in intergroup conflict: Group identity and perceived target of threat," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 122-133.
    20. Cristina Bicchieri & Eugen Dimant & Simon Gächter & Daniele Nosenzo, 2020. "Observability, Social Proximity, and the Erosion of Norm Compliance," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 009, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1446-:d:1034328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.