IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p702-d1020647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of Cavity Length Using an Interpretable Ensemble Learning Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ganggui Guo

    (School of Hydraulic Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Shanshan Li

    (Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xian 710048, China)

  • Yakun Liu

    (School of Hydraulic Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Ze Cao

    (School of Hydraulic Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Yangyu Deng

    (School of Hydraulic Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

Abstract

The cavity length, which is a vital index in aeration and corrosion reduction engineering, is affected by many factors and is challenging to calculate. In this study, 10-fold cross-validation was performed to select the optimal input configuration. Additionally, the hyperparameters of three ensemble learning models—random forest (RF), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), and extreme gradient boosting tree (XGBOOST)—were fine-tuned by the Bayesian optimization (BO) algorithm to improve the prediction accuracy and compare the five empirical methods. The XGBOOST method was observed to present the highest prediction accuracy. Further interpretability analysis carried out using the Sobol method demonstrated its ability to reasonably capture the varying relative significance of different input features under different flow conditions. The Sobol sensitivity analysis also observed two patterns of extracting information from the input features in ML models: (1) the main effect of individual features in ensemble learning and (2) the interactive effect between each feature in SVR. From the results, the models obtaining individual information both predict the cavity length more accurately than that using interactive information. Subsequently, the XGBOOST captures more correct information from features, which leads to the varied Sobol index in accordance with outside phenomena; meanwhile, the predicted results fit the experimental points best.

Suggested Citation

  • Ganggui Guo & Shanshan Li & Yakun Liu & Ze Cao & Yangyu Deng, 2022. "Prediction of Cavity Length Using an Interpretable Ensemble Learning Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:702-:d:1020647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/702/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/702/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weizhang Liang & Suizhi Luo & Guoyan Zhao & Hao Wu, 2020. "Predicting Hard Rock Pillar Stability Using GBDT, XGBoost, and LightGBM Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-17, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leilei Liu & Guoyan Zhao & Weizhang Liang, 2023. "Slope Stability Prediction Using k -NN-Based Optimum-Path Forest Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-31, July.
    2. Babek Erdebilli & Burcu Devrim-İçtenbaş, 2022. "Ensemble Voting Regression Based on Machine Learning for Predicting Medical Waste: A Case from Turkey," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Ji, Shujuan & Wang, Xin & Lyu, Tao & Liu, Xiaojie & Wang, Yuanqing & Heinen, Eva & Sun, Zhenwei, 2022. "Understanding cycling distance according to the prediction of the XGBoost and the interpretation of SHAP: A non-linear and interaction effect analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Ning Li & Masoud Zare & Congke Yi & Rafael Jimenez, 2022. "Stability Risk Assessment of Underground Rock Pillars Using Logistic Model Trees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Yiheng Li & Weidong Chen, 2020. "A Comparative Performance Assessment of Ensemble Learning for Credit Scoring," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Jin, Scarlett T. & Wang, Lei & Sui, Daniel, 2023. "How the built environment affects E-scooter sharing link flows: A machine learning approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    7. Mahmood Ahmad & Suraparb Keawsawasvong & Mohd Rasdan Bin Ibrahim & Muhammad Waseem & Kazem Reza Kashyzadeh & Mohanad Muayad Sabri Sabri, 2022. "Novel Approach to Predicting Soil Permeability Coefficient Using Gaussian Process Regression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Niaz Muhammad Shahani & Xigui Zheng & Xiaowei Guo & Xin Wei, 2022. "Machine Learning-Based Intelligent Prediction of Elastic Modulus of Rocks at Thar Coalfield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    9. Jin, Tanhua & Cheng, Long & Liu, Zhicheng & Cao, Jun & Huang, Haosheng & Witlox, Frank, 2022. "Nonlinear public transit accessibility effects on housing prices: Heterogeneity across price segments," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 48-59.
    10. Yutao Li & Chuanguo Jia & Hong Chen & Hongchen Su & Jiahao Chen & Duoduo Wang, 2023. "Machine Learning Assessment of Damage Grade for Post-Earthquake Buildings: A Three-Stage Approach Directly Handling Categorical Features," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.
    11. Guoyan Zhao & Meng Wang & Weizhang Liang, 2022. "A Comparative Study of SSA-BPNN, SSA-ENN, and SSA-SVR Models for Predicting the Thickness of an Excavation Damaged Zone around the Roadway in Rock," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:702-:d:1020647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.