IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i8p1351-d796500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of SSA-BPNN, SSA-ENN, and SSA-SVR Models for Predicting the Thickness of an Excavation Damaged Zone around the Roadway in Rock

Author

Listed:
  • Guoyan Zhao

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Meng Wang

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Weizhang Liang

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

Due to the disturbance effect of excavation, the original stress is redistributed, resulting in an excavation damaged zone around the roadway. It is significant to predict the thickness of an excavation damaged zone because it directly affects the stability of roadways. This study used a sparrow search algorithm to improve a backpropagation neural network, and an Elman neural network and support vector regression models to predict the thickness of an excavation damaged zone. Firstly, 209 cases with four indicators were collected from 34 mines. Then, the sparrow search algorithm was used to optimize the parameters of the backpropagation neural network, Elman neural network, and support vector regression models. According to the optimal parameters, these three predictive models were established based on the training set (80% of the data). Finally, the test set (20% of the data) was used to verify the reliability of each model. The mean absolute error, coefficient of determination, Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient, mean absolute percentage error, Theil’s U value, root-mean-square error, and the sum of squares error were used to evaluate the predictive performance. The results showed that the sparrow search algorithm improved the predictive performance of the traditional backpropagation neural network, Elman neural network, and support vector regression models, and the sparrow search algorithm–backpropagation neural network model had the best comprehensive prediction performance. The mean absolute error, coefficient of determination, Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient, mean absolute percentage error, Theil’s U value, root-mean-square error, and sum of squares error of the sparrow search algorithm–backpropagation neural network model were 0.1246, 0.9277, −1.2331, 8.4127%, 0.0084, 0.1636, and 1.1241, respectively. The proposed model could provide a reliable reference for the thickness prediction of an excavation damaged zone, and was helpful in the risk management of roadway stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Guoyan Zhao & Meng Wang & Weizhang Liang, 2022. "A Comparative Study of SSA-BPNN, SSA-ENN, and SSA-SVR Models for Predicting the Thickness of an Excavation Damaged Zone around the Roadway in Rock," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:8:p:1351-:d:796500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/8/1351/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/8/1351/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weizhang Liang & Suizhi Luo & Guoyan Zhao & Hao Wu, 2020. "Predicting Hard Rock Pillar Stability Using GBDT, XGBoost, and LightGBM Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Weizhang Liang & Asli Sari & Guoyan Zhao & Stephen D. McKinnon & Hao Wu, 2020. "Short-term rockburst risk prediction using ensemble learning methods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(2), pages 1923-1946, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leilei Liu & Guoyan Zhao & Weizhang Liang, 2023. "Slope Stability Prediction Using k -NN-Based Optimum-Path Forest Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-31, July.
    2. Ying Chen & Qi Da & Weizhang Liang & Peng Xiao & Bing Dai & Guoyan Zhao, 2022. "Bagged Ensemble of Gaussian Process Classifiers for Assessing Rockburst Damage Potential with an Imbalanced Dataset," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Yu, Ruyang & Zhang, Kai & Ramasubramanian, Brindha & Jiang, Shu & Ramakrishna, Seeram & Tang, Yuhang, 2024. "Ensemble learning for predicting average thermal extraction load of a hydrothermal geothermal field: A case study in Guanzhong Basin, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    4. Xizi Wang & Yakun Ma & Guangwei Hu, 2024. "Mobile Platforms as the Alleged Culprit for Work–Life Imbalance: A Data-Driven Method Using Co-Occurrence Network and Explainable AI Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Babek Erdebilli & Burcu Devrim-İçtenbaş, 2022. "Ensemble Voting Regression Based on Machine Learning for Predicting Medical Waste: A Case from Turkey," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Diyuan Li & Zida Liu & Danial Jahed Armaghani & Peng Xiao & Jian Zhou, 2022. "Novel Ensemble Tree Solution for Rockburst Prediction Using Deep Forest," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Keyou Shi & Yong Liu & Weizhang Liang, 2022. "An Extended ORESTE Approach for Evaluating Rockburst Risk under Uncertain Environments," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Ji, Shujuan & Wang, Xin & Lyu, Tao & Liu, Xiaojie & Wang, Yuanqing & Heinen, Eva & Sun, Zhenwei, 2022. "Understanding cycling distance according to the prediction of the XGBoost and the interpretation of SHAP: A non-linear and interaction effect analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    9. Shouye Cheng & Xin Yin & Feng Gao & Yucong Pan, 2024. "Microseismic Data-Driven Short-Term Rockburst Evaluation in Underground Engineering with Strategic Data Augmentation and Extremely Randomized Forest," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Jie Li & Helin Fu & Kaixun Hu & Wei Chen, 2023. "Data Preprocessing and Machine Learning Modeling for Rockburst Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-32, September.
    11. Ning Li & Masoud Zare & Congke Yi & Rafael Jimenez, 2022. "Stability Risk Assessment of Underground Rock Pillars Using Logistic Model Trees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Yiheng Li & Weidong Chen, 2020. "A Comparative Performance Assessment of Ensemble Learning for Credit Scoring," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Jin, Scarlett T. & Wang, Lei & Sui, Daniel, 2023. "How the built environment affects E-scooter sharing link flows: A machine learning approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    14. Shaohan Zhang & Shucheng Tan & Yongqi Sun & Duanyu Ding & Wei Yang, 2024. "Risk Mapping of Geological Hazards in Plateau Mountainous Areas Based on Multisource Remote Sensing Data Extraction and Machine Learning (Fuyuan, China)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-25, August.
    15. Mahmood Ahmad & Suraparb Keawsawasvong & Mohd Rasdan Bin Ibrahim & Muhammad Waseem & Kazem Reza Kashyzadeh & Mohanad Muayad Sabri Sabri, 2022. "Novel Approach to Predicting Soil Permeability Coefficient Using Gaussian Process Regression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    16. Niaz Muhammad Shahani & Xigui Zheng & Xiaowei Guo & Xin Wei, 2022. "Machine Learning-Based Intelligent Prediction of Elastic Modulus of Rocks at Thar Coalfield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Jin, Tanhua & Cheng, Long & Liu, Zhicheng & Cao, Jun & Huang, Haosheng & Witlox, Frank, 2022. "Nonlinear public transit accessibility effects on housing prices: Heterogeneity across price segments," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 48-59.
    18. Guangtuo Bao & Kepeng Hou & Huafen Sun, 2023. "Rock Burst Intensity-Grade Prediction Based on Comprehensive Weighting Method and Bayesian Optimization Algorithm–Improved-Support Vector Machine Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-27, November.
    19. Yutao Li & Chuanguo Jia & Hong Chen & Hongchen Su & Jiahao Chen & Duoduo Wang, 2023. "Machine Learning Assessment of Damage Grade for Post-Earthquake Buildings: A Three-Stage Approach Directly Handling Categorical Features," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Ganggui Guo & Shanshan Li & Yakun Liu & Ze Cao & Yangyu Deng, 2022. "Prediction of Cavity Length Using an Interpretable Ensemble Learning Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:8:p:1351-:d:796500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.