IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p687-d1020391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Increasing Farm Plot Size Influence the Visual Quality of Everyday Agricultural Landscapes?

Author

Listed:
  • Kristina Janeckova Molnarova

    (Department of Landscape and Urban Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic)

  • Iris C. Bohnet

    (Department of Landscape and Urban Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic)

  • Kamila Svobodova

    (Department of Landscape and Urban Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic
    Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, University of Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Kateřina Černý Pixová

    (Department of Landscape and Urban Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic)

  • Michael Daniels

    (Department of Geography and the Environment, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80210, USA)

  • Jan Skaloš

    (Department of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic)

  • Kristýna Drhlíková

    (Department of Landscape and Urban Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic)

  • Hossein Azadi

    (Department of Landscape and Urban Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic
    Department of Economics and Rural Development, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
    Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Roman Zámečník

    (Department of Planting Design and Maintenance, Faculty of Horticulture, Mendel University in Brno, Valtická 337, 691 44 Lednice, Czech Republic)

  • Petr Sklenička

    (Department of Landscape and Urban Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The increase in farm plot size is one of the most apparent and significant trends that have influenced central and eastern European agricultural landscapes since the 1950s. In many countries where the average plot size in traditional land-use systems did not exceed several hectares, present-day plots reach the size of 200 ha or more. In recent times, efforts have been made to reverse this trend to restore important ecosystem functions and to re-establish the aesthetic values of everyday landscapes. Visual landscape quality is becoming a major driving force in the development of agricultural landscapes with known effects on people’s well-being and health, and this quality plays an increasingly important role in agricultural policies. However, no comprehensive research has been carried out to establish the links between perceived visual landscape quality and the scale of the farm plot pattern. The current study was therefore designed to determine whether greater farmland pattern heterogeneity, i.e., smaller farm plot sizes, is consistent with higher visual preferences. The results showed that people preferred a small-scale plot pattern in landscapes characterized by a flat relief and a low proportion of woody vegetation. These homogeneous landscapes were also overall considered significantly less beautiful than more diverse landscapes. However, even a moderate decrease in plot size notably improved these low beauty scores. These preferences were displayed consistently by all respondents, and most strongly by older respondents, respondents with a higher level of education, and those professionally engaged in landscape design or conservation. The high level of consensus among respondents in rejecting further land consolidation in homogeneous landscapes, which form a large proportion of European farmland, underlines that the results of this study provide a valid argument for discussing sustainable agricultural plot sizes as part of agricultural policy-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristina Janeckova Molnarova & Iris C. Bohnet & Kamila Svobodova & Kateřina Černý Pixová & Michael Daniels & Jan Skaloš & Kristýna Drhlíková & Hossein Azadi & Roman Zámečník & Petr Sklenička, 2022. "Does Increasing Farm Plot Size Influence the Visual Quality of Everyday Agricultural Landscapes?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:687-:d:1020391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/687/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/687/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mara Balestrieri & Amedeo Ganciu, 2018. "Landscape Changes in Rural Areas: A Focus on Sardinian Territory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Azadi, Hossein & Vanhaute, Eric & Janečková, Kristina & Sklenička, Petr & Teklemariam, Dereje & Feng, Lei & Witlox, Frank, 2020. "Evolution of land distribution in the context of development theories," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Heinrichs, J. & Kuhn, T. & Pahmeyer, C. & Britz, W., 2021. "Economic effects of plot sizes and farm-plot distances in organic and conventional farming systems: A farm-level analysis for Germany," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    4. James Stevenson & Bernard Vanlauwe & Karen Macours & Nancy Johnson & Lakshmi Krishnan & Frank Place & David Spielman & Karl Hughes & Paul Vlek, 2019. "Farmer adoption of plot- and farm-level natural resource management practices: Between rhetoric and reality," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02095028, HAL.
    5. Xingzhao Liu & Guimei Yang & Qingmin Que & Qi Wang & Zengke Zhang & Liujing Huang, 2022. "How Do Landscape Heterogeneity, Community Structure, and Topographical Factors Contribute to the Plant Diversity of Urban Remnant Vegetation at Different Scales?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Betakova, Vendula & Vojar, Jiri & Sklenicka, Petr, 2015. "Wind turbines location: How many and how far?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 23-31.
    7. Jie Zheng & Guodong Chen & Tiantian Zhang & Mingjing Ding & Binglin Liu & Hao Wang, 2021. "Exploring Spatial Variations in the Relationships between Landscape Functions and Human Activities in Suburban Rural Communities: A Case Study in Jiangning District, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Swain,Nigel, 1985. "Collective Farms which Work?," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521268530, October.
    9. Cosimo A. Picuno & Ivan Laković & Demetrios Roubis & Pietro Picuno & Aleksandra Kapetanović, 2017. "Analysis of the Characteristics of Traditional Rural Constructions for Animal Corrals in the Adriatic-Ionian Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ioannidis, Romanos & Koutsoyiannis, Demetris, 2020. "A review of land use, visibility and public perception of renewable energy in the context of landscape impact," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    2. Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment: Does the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework for BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project) Put an End to Disputes Over The Recognition and Measurement of Intellectual Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Lobell, David B., 2020. "Viewpoint: Principles and priorities for one CGIAR," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Adam Pawlewicz & Wojciech Gotkiewicz & Katarzyna Brodzińska & Katarzyna Pawlewicz & Bartosz Mickiewicz & Paweł Kluczek, 2022. "Organic Farming as an Alternative Maintenance Strategy in the Opinion of Farmers from Natura 2000 Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Chris Hann, 2020. "Marketization and development on a European periphery: From peasant oikos to socialism and neoliberal capitalism on the Danube-Tisza interfluve," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 200-215, February.
    6. Ivan Laković & Aleksandra Kapetanović & Olga Pelcer-Vujačić & Tatjana Koprivica, 2020. "Endangered Mediterranean Mountain Heritage—Case Study of katuns at the Kuči Mountain in Montenegro," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-26, July.
    7. Macours, Karen & Behaghel, Luc & Gignoux, Jérémie, 2020. "Social learning in agriculture: does smallholder heterogeneity impede technology diffusion in Sub-Saharan Africa?," CEPR Discussion Papers 15220, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Geovanni Hernández Galvez & Daniel Chuck Liévano & Omar Sarracino Martínez & Orlando Lastres Danguillecourt & José Rafael Dorrego Portela & Antonio Trujillo Narcía & Ricardo Saldaña Flores & Liliana P, 2022. "Harnessing Offshore Wind Energy along the Mexican Coastline in the Gulf of Mexico—An Exploratory Study including Sustainability Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-26, May.
    9. Jan-Philipp Sasse & Evelina Trutnevyte, 2023. "A low-carbon electricity sector in Europe risks sustaining regional inequalities in benefits and vulnerabilities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Goetghebuer, Tatiana, 2011. "Productive inefficiency in patriarchal family farms: evidence from Mali," Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011 34, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
    11. Virtanen, E.A. & Lappalainen, J. & Nurmi, M. & Viitasalo, M. & Tikanmäki, M. & Heinonen, J. & Atlaskin, E. & Kallasvuo, M. & Tikkanen, H. & Moilanen, A., 2022. "Balancing profitability of energy production, societal impacts and biodiversity in offshore wind farm design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Enevoldsen, Peter, 2016. "Onshore wind energy in Northern European forests: Reviewing the risks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1251-1262.
    13. Olivier JOALLAND & Tina RAMBONILAZA, 2017. "Assessing the impact of renewable energy infrastructure on the “tourist value” in rural landscapes: a spatial hedonic approach," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2017-10, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    14. Mariusz Dacko & Tomasz Wojewodzic & Jacek Pijanowski & Jarosław Taszakowski & Aneta Dacko & Jarosław Janus, 2021. "Increase in the Value of Agricultural Parcels—Modelling and Simulation of the Effects of Land Consolidation Project," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Linda Mayoux, 1993. "Integration is Not Enough: Gender Inequality and Empowerment in Nicaraguan Agricultural Co‐operatives," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 11(1), pages 67-90, March.
    16. Guirkinger, Catherine & Platteau, Jean-Philippe & Goetghebuer, Tatiana, 2015. "Productive inefficiency in extended agricultural households: Evidence from Mali," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 17-27.
    17. Cao, Jiu Fa & Zhu, Wei Jun & Shen, Wen Zhong & Sørensen, Jens Nørkær & Sun, Zhen Ye, 2020. "Optimizing wind energy conversion efficiency with respect to noise: A study on multi-criteria wind farm layout design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 468-485.
    18. Bina Agarwal, 2010. "Rethinking Agricultural Production Collectivities : The case for a group approach to energize agriculture and empower poor farmers," Development Economics Working Papers 22736, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    19. Unay-Gailhard, İlkay & Bojnec, Štefan, 2021. "Gender and the environmental concerns of young farmers: Do young women farmers make a difference on family farms?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 88, pages 71-82.
    20. Salak, B. & Lindberg, K. & Kienast, F. & Hunziker, M., 2021. "How landscape-technology fit affects public evaluations of renewable energy infrastructure scenarios. A hybrid choice model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:687-:d:1020391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.