IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i9p5166-d800988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards an Integrative Theory of Bullying in Residential Care for Youth

Author

Listed:
  • Ivana Sekol

    (Department of Criminology and Social Sciences, University of Derby, Derby DE1 1DZ, UK)

  • David P. Farrington

    (Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 9DA, UK)

  • Jane L. Ireland

    (Ashworth Research Centre, School of Psychology and Computer Science, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK)

Abstract

To date, no theory of bullying in residential care for youth has been proposed. By drawing on the results of the existing research on bullying and peer violence in youth residential care and adapting the Multifactor Model of Bullying in Secure Settings (MMBSS), this paper proposes the first integrative theory of bullying in residential care—the Multifactor Model of Bullying in Residential Settings (MMB-RS). The paper first summarises the existing empirical findings on bullying and peer violence in residential care for youth and describes the MMBSS. It then moves on to proposing and describing the MMB-RS. In a nutshell, the MMB-RS assumes that bullying in residential care is shaped by a dynamic interaction between a complex set of individual and contextual factors. The model also takes into account the interaction between bullies and victims , thus explicitly considering the social interactional components of bullying and victimisation and offering possible explanations of the sizable overlap between bullying and victimisation in residential care, including the possible contributions of residential peer cultures. The paper concludes by noting the importance of empirically testing the MMB-RS and proposing a programme of research that may be helpful in testing it.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivana Sekol & David P. Farrington & Jane L. Ireland, 2022. "Towards an Integrative Theory of Bullying in Residential Care for Youth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5166-:d:800988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5166/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5166/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sekol, Ivana, 2013. "Peer violence in adolescent residential care: A qualitative examination of contextual and peer factors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 1901-1912.
    2. Mazzone, Angela & Nocentini, Annalaura & Menesini, Ersilia, 2019. "Bullying in residential care for children: Qualitative findings from five European countries," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 451-460.
    3. Sekol, Ivana & Farrington, David P., 2010. "The overlap between bullying and victimization in adolescent residential care: Are bully/victims a special category?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 1758-1769, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pinchover, Shulamit & Attar-Schwartz, Shalhevet, 2014. "Institutional social climate and adjustment difficulties of adolescents in residential care: The mediating role of victimization by peers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 393-399.
    2. Sung, Yu-Hsien & Chen, Li-Ming & Yen, Cheng-Fang & Valcke, Martin, 2018. "Double trouble: The developmental process of school bully-victims," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 279-288.
    3. Miranda, Alejandra & Rodriguez, Michael C., 2023. "Are bullying experiences and developmental assets associated with education outcomes for youth in foster care?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Moore, Tim & McArthur, Morag & Death, Jodi & Tilbury, Clare & Roche, Steven, 2017. "Young people's views on safety and preventing abuse and harm in residential care: “It's got to be better than home”," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 212-219.
    5. Abdullah, Alhassan & Cudjoe, Ebenezer & Manful, Esmeranda, 2018. "Barriers to childcare in Children's Homes in Ghana: Caregivers' solutions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 450-456.
    6. Mazzone, Angela & Nocentini, Annalaura & Menesini, Ersilia, 2019. "Bullying in residential care for children: Qualitative findings from five European countries," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 451-460.
    7. Mathys, Cécile, 2017. "Effective components of interventions in juvenile justice facilities: How to take care of delinquent youths?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 319-327.
    8. Sekol, Ivana, 2013. "Peer violence in adolescent residential care: A qualitative examination of contextual and peer factors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 1901-1912.
    9. Moore, Tim & McArthur, Morag & Death, Jodi & Tilbury, Clare & Roche, Steven, 2018. "Sticking with us through it all: The importance of trustworthy relationships for children and young people in residential care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 68-75.
    10. Oriol, Xavier & Miranda, Rafael & Unanue, Jesus, 2020. "Bullying victimization at school and subjective well-being in early and late Peruvian adolescents in residential care: The contribution of satisfaction with microsystem domains," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5166-:d:800988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.