IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v32y2010i12p1758-1769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The overlap between bullying and victimization in adolescent residential care: Are bully/victims a special category?

Author

Listed:
  • Sekol, Ivana
  • Farrington, David P.

Abstract

This research examined whether bully/victims in adolescent residential care are qualitatively different from pure bullies and pure victims. Male and female young people (NÂ =Â 601) aged 11-21 from 22 residential institutions in Croatia completed an anonymous self-report questionnaire measuring bullying as well as the Basic Empathy Scale, the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale and the Big Five Personality Inventory. Based on the bullying questionnaire, the residents were classified as pure bullies, pure victims, bully/victims and those not involved in bullying/victimization. Bully/victims were compared to pure bullies and pure victims on a number of background and personality variables. The differences found were in degree rather than in kind. Bully/victims did not differ from both pure bullies and pure victims on any of the measures nor did they differ from pure bullies and pure victims in the way they bully or in the way they are victimized. Above those that could be expected by chance, there were no independent predictors that were unique to bully/victims nor were there strong interaction effects between bully and victim statuses. The results are discussed with reference to the existing prison and school-based literature about bully/victims and a number of research and policy recommendations are provided. It is concluded that bully/victims are not qualitatively different from pure bullies and pure victims, and that future research should focus on bullies and victims rather than bully/victims.

Suggested Citation

  • Sekol, Ivana & Farrington, David P., 2010. "The overlap between bullying and victimization in adolescent residential care: Are bully/victims a special category?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 1758-1769, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:32:y:2010:i:12:p:1758-1769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(10)00221-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sung, Yu-Hsien & Chen, Li-Ming & Yen, Cheng-Fang & Valcke, Martin, 2018. "Double trouble: The developmental process of school bully-victims," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 279-288.
    2. Miranda, Alejandra & Rodriguez, Michael C., 2023. "Are bullying experiences and developmental assets associated with education outcomes for youth in foster care?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    3. Oriol, Xavier & Miranda, Rafael & Unanue, Jesus, 2020. "Bullying victimization at school and subjective well-being in early and late Peruvian adolescents in residential care: The contribution of satisfaction with microsystem domains," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Pinchover, Shulamit & Attar-Schwartz, Shalhevet, 2014. "Institutional social climate and adjustment difficulties of adolescents in residential care: The mediating role of victimization by peers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 393-399.
    5. Sekol, Ivana, 2013. "Peer violence in adolescent residential care: A qualitative examination of contextual and peer factors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 1901-1912.
    6. Ivana Sekol & David P. Farrington & Jane L. Ireland, 2022. "Towards an Integrative Theory of Bullying in Residential Care for Youth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:32:y:2010:i:12:p:1758-1769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.