IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i7p4168-d784546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in Driving Anger among Professional Drivers: A Cross-Cultural Study

Author

Listed:
  • Milanko Damjanović

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

  • Spasoje Mićić

    (Faculty of Transportation, Pan-European University “Apeiron”, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

  • Boško Matović

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

  • Dragan Jovanović

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Aleksandar Bulajić

    (Road Traffic Department, The Higher Education Technical School of Professional Studies, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

Abstract

Public transport systems have a vital role in achieving sustainable mobility goals, diminishing reliance on private individual transport and improving overall public health. Despite that, transport operators are often in situations that require them to cope with complex working conditions that lead to negative emotions such as anger. The current study represents a segment of the permanent global research agenda that seeks to devise and test a psychometric scale for measuring driving anger in professional drivers. The present research is one of the first attempts to examine the factorial validity and the cross-cultural measurement equivalence of the broadly utilized Driving Anger Scale (DAS) in three culturally different countries within the Western Balkans region. The respondents (N = 1054) were taxi, bus and truck drivers between 19 and 75 years of age. The results pertaining to confirmatory factor analysis showed that there were adequate fit statistics for the specified six-dimensional measurement model of the DAS. The measurement invariance testing showed that the meaning and psychometric performance of driving anger and its facets are equivalent across countries and types of professional drivers. Furthermore, the results showed that driving anger facets had positive correlations with dysfunctional ways of expressing anger and negative correlations with the form of the prosocial anger expression. In addition, the results revealed that taxi drivers displayed considerably higher levels of anger while driving and aggressive driving than truck and bus drivers. Overall, this study replicates and extends the accumulated knowledge of previous investigations, suggesting that the original DAS remains a reliable and stable instrument for measuring driving anger in day-to-day driving conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Milanko Damjanović & Spasoje Mićić & Boško Matović & Dragan Jovanović & Aleksandar Bulajić, 2022. "Differences in Driving Anger among Professional Drivers: A Cross-Cultural Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:4168-:d:784546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/4168/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/4168/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    2. Poulopoulou, Maria & Spyropoulou, Ioanna, 2019. "Active traffic management in urban areas: Is it effective for professional drivers? The case of variable message signs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 412-423.
    3. Zajenkowski, Marcin & Gignac, Gilles E., 2018. "Why do angry people overestimate their intelligence? Neuroticism as a suppressor of the association between Trait-Anger and subjectively assessed intelligence," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 12-21.
    4. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    5. Nonhlanhla Tlotleng & Nisha Naicker & Angela Mathee & Andrew C. Todd & Palesa Nkomo & Shane A. Norris, 2022. "Association between Bone Lead Concentration and Aggression in Youth from a Sub-Cohort of the Birth to Twenty Cohort," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Veerle Ross & Nora Reinolsmann & Jill Lobbestael & Chantal Timmermans & Tom Brijs & Wael Alhajyaseen & Kris Brijs, 2021. "Relating Reactive and Proactive Aggression to Trait Driving Anger in Young and Adult Males: A Pilot Study Using Explicit and Implicit Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Tingru Zhang & Alan H. S. Chan & Hongjun Xue & Xiaoyan Zhang & Da Tao, 2019. "Driving Anger, Aberrant Driving Behaviors, and Road Crash Risk: Testing of a Mediated Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Elżbieta Macioszek, 2020. "Roundabout Entry Capacity Calculation—A Case Study Based on Roundabouts in Tokyo, Japan, and Tokyo Surroundings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Shuling Li & Tingru Zhang & Ben D. Sawyer & Wei Zhang & Peter A. Hancock, 2019. "Angry Drivers Take Risky Decisions: Evidence from Neurophysiological Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    10. Luis Montoro & Sergio Useche & Francisco Alonso & Boris Cendales, 2018. "Work Environment, Stress, and Driving Anger: A Structural Equation Model for Predicting Traffic Sanctions of Public Transport Drivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md. Mominur Rahman & Bilkis Akhter, 2021. "The impact of investment in human capital on bank performance: evidence from Bangladesh," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Andreea-Ionela Puiu & Anca Monica Ardeleanu & Camelia Cojocaru & Anca Bratu, 2021. "Exploring the Effect of Status Quo, Innovativeness, and Involvement Tendencies on Luxury Fashion Innovations: The Mediation Role of Status Consumption," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Allen, Jaime & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2019. "On evasion behaviour in public transport: Dissatisfaction or contagion?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 626-651.
    4. Sai-fu Fung & Esther Oi-wah Chow & Chau-kiu Cheung, 2020. "Development and Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of a Brief Wisdom Development Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Leonie Kuen & Fiona Schürmann & Daniel Westmattelmann & Sophie Hartwig & Shay Tzafrir & Gerhard Schewe, 2023. "Trust transfer effects and associated risks in telemedicine adoption," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Vitor Ciampolini & Fernando Santos & Ricardo Teixeira Quinaud & Martin Camiré & Maurício de Oliveira Migliano & Juarez Vieira do Nascimento & Michel Milistetd, 2021. "Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Portuguese Coaching Life Skills in Sport Questionnaire," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    7. Fred van Raaij, W. & Riitsalu, Leonore & Põder, Kaire, 2023. "Direct and indirect effects of self-control and future time perspective on financial well-being," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Silvia Mariela Méndez-Prado & Vanessa Rodriguez & Kevin Peralta-Rizzo & Patricia Everaert & Martin Valcke, 2023. "An Assessment Tool to Identify the Financial Literacy Level of Financial Education Programs Participants’ Executed by Ecuadorian Financial Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-24, January.
    9. Sebastian Kurten & David Winant & Kathleen Beullens, 2021. "Mothers Matter: Using Regression Tree Algorithms to Predict Adolescents’ Sharing of Drunk References on Social Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Érika Martins Silva Ramos & Cecilia Jakobsson Bergstad, 2021. "The Psychology of Sharing: Multigroup Analysis among Users and Non-Users of Carsharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Serwaah, Priscilla & Shneor, Rotem & Nyarko, Samuel Anokye & Nielsen, Kristian Roed, 2024. "Explaining gender differences in crowdfunding contribution intentions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    12. Daniel Schulze & Kathrin Heinitz & Timo Lorenz, 2018. "Comparative organizational research starts with sound measurement: Validity and invariance of Turker’s corporate social responsibility scale in five cross-cultural samples," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Essie Sutton & Kimberly A. Schonert-Reichl & Amery D. Wu & Molly Stewart Lawlor, 2018. "Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of the Self-Compassion Scale Short Form Adapted for Children Ages 8–12," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(4), pages 1217-1236, August.
    14. Elżbieta Macioszek & Agata Kurek, 2020. "The Use of a Park and Ride System—A Case Study Based on the City of Cracow (Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-26, July.
    15. Lindsey W. Vilca & Evelyn L. Chambi-Mamani & Emely D. Quispe-Kana & Mónica Hernández-López & Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, 2022. "Functioning of the EROS-R Scale in a Clinical Sample of Psychiatric Patients: New Psychometric Evidence from the Classical Test Theory and the Item Response Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    16. Shuling Li & Tingru Zhang & Ben D. Sawyer & Wei Zhang & Peter A. Hancock, 2019. "Angry Drivers Take Risky Decisions: Evidence from Neurophysiological Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    17. Abisola Osinuga & Brandi Janssen & Nathan B Fethke & William T Story & John A Imaledo & Kelly K Baker, 2021. "Understanding Rural Women’s Domestic Work Experiences (DWE) in Ibadan, Nigeria: Development of a Measurement Tool Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Raimundo Aguayo-Estremera & Gustavo R. Cañadas & Elena Ortega-Campos & Tania Ariza & Emilia Inmaculada De la Fuente-Solana, 2023. "Validity Evidence for the Internal Structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey: A Comparison between Classical CFA Model and the ESEM and the Bifactor Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Mihaela Moca & Alina Badulescu, 2023. "Determinants of Economical High School Students’ Attitudes toward Mobile Devices Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    20. Sandrine Péneau & Marc Bénard & Margaux Robert & Benjamin Allès & Valentina A. Andreeva & Frédéric Courtois & Mathilde Touvier & Christophe Leys & France Bellisle, 2022. "Validation of the Flexible and Rigid Cognitive Restraint Scales in a General French Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:4168-:d:784546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.