IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i5p3101-d765275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale: The Parent Version

Author

Listed:
  • Borja Costa-López

    (Department of Health Psychology, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Nicolás Ruiz-Robledillo

    (Department of Health Psychology, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Natalia Albaladejo-Blázquez

    (Department of Health Psychology, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Monika Baryła-Matejczuk

    (Institute of Psychology and Human Sciences, University of Economics and Innovation, 20-209 Lublin, Poland)

  • Rosario Ferrer-Cascales

    (Department of Health Psychology, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

Abstract

Environmental sensitivity is the ability to perceive, register and process information about the environment, which differs among children and adolescents. The Highly Sensitive Child (HSC) scale has been used to assess environmental sensitivity in youngsters. The HSC scale is a short and 12-item adapted version of the Highly Sensitive Person (HSP) scale. The aim of this pilot study is to transculturally adapt the Highly Sensitive Child (HSC) scale, and to analyze its factorial structure, reliability and validity. First, a transcultural adaptation was conducted by bilingual experts. Second, once the questionnaire was translated, the psychometric properties were analyzed. The Spanish version of the HSC scale was administered to parents answering about information of 141 children between 6 and 10 years old. The Spanish version of the Emotionality, Activity and Sociability Survey (EAS) was also applied. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the three-factor structure of sensitivity in our Spanish sample. This structure included the following dimensions: (1) Ease of Excitation (EOE), (2) Low Sensory Threshold (LST), and (3) Aesthetic Sensitivity (AES). Moreover, both Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω values indicated that the Spanish version of the HSC scale was a reliable measure of environmental sensitivity, as a general factor of sensitivity ( α = 0.84), and even in its three dimensions: EOE ( α = 0.86), LST ( α = 0.77) and AES ( α = 0.73). Finally, the correlations for convergent validity showed positive associations, especially among the three dimensions of SPS and Emotionality (EOE r = 0.351; LST r = 0.274; AES r = 0.259), which was one of the domains of the EAS survey. The pilot study provided interesting results, which showed a reliable and valid replication of the original structure of sensitivity in the Spanish samples.

Suggested Citation

  • Borja Costa-López & Nicolás Ruiz-Robledillo & Natalia Albaladejo-Blázquez & Monika Baryła-Matejczuk & Rosario Ferrer-Cascales, 2022. "Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale: The Parent Version," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:3101-:d:765275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/3101/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/3101/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel Green & Yanyun Yang, 2009. "Reliability of Summed Item Scores Using Structural Equation Modeling: An Alternative to Coefficient Alpha," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 155-167, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monika Baryła-Matejczuk & Robert Porzak & Wiesław Poleszak, 2022. "HSPS-10—Short Version of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale for Students Aged 12–25 Years," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Danni Liu & Anouk Dijk & Shanyan Lin & Zhenhong Wang & Maja Deković & Judith Semon Dubas, 2023. "Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale Across Age Groups, Gender, and Informants," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(4), pages 1755-1780, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. César Merino-Soto & Gina Chávez-Ventura & Verónica López-Fernández & Guillermo M. Chans & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Learning Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-L): Psychometric and Measurement Invariance Evidence in Peruvian Undergraduate Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Aline Lopes Moreira & Jorge Castellá Sarriera & Leonardo Fernandes Martins & Lívia Maria Bedin & Maria Angela Mattar Yunes & Luciana Cassarino Perez & Murilo Ricardo Zibetti, 2022. "Psychometric Properties of Children’s Subjective Well-Being Scales: a Multigroup Study Investigating School Type, Gender, Age and Region of Children in the South and Southeast Regions of Brazil," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(2), pages 657-679, April.
    3. Miguel Ángel López-Sáez & Ariadna Angulo-Brunet & R. Lucas Platero & Oscar Lecuona, 2022. "The Adaptation and Validation of the Trans Attitudes and Beliefs Scale to the Spanish Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Ovcina Adnan & Arslanagic-Kalajdzic Maja, 2024. "The Role of Monitoring and Evaluation and Project Implementation Management System for Non-Profit Project Performance in Developing Countries," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 63-76.
    5. Hanne Søberg Finbråten & Peter Nowak & Robert Griebler & Éva Bíró & Mitja Vrdelja & Rana Charafeddine & Lennert Griese & Henrik Bøggild & Doris Schaeffer & Thomas Link & Zdenek Kucera & Julien Mancini, 2022. "The HLS 19 -COM-P, a New Instrument for Measuring Communicative Health Literacy in Interaction with Physicians: Development and Validation in Nine European Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Klaas Sijtsma, 2009. "Reliability Beyond Theory and Into Practice," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 169-173, March.
    7. César Merino-Soto & Manuel Fernández-Arata & Jaime Fuentes-Balderrama & Guillermo M. Chans & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Research Perceived Competency Scale: A New Psychometric Adaptation for University Students’ Research Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Lindsey W. Vilca & Evelyn L. Chambi-Mamani & Emely D. Quispe-Kana & Mónica Hernández-López & Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, 2022. "Functioning of the EROS-R Scale in a Clinical Sample of Psychiatric Patients: New Psychometric Evidence from the Classical Test Theory and the Item Response Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Sergio Longobardi & Margherita Maria Pagliuca & Andrea Regoli, 2022. "School climate and academic performance of Italian students: the role of disciplinary behaviour and parental involvement," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(5), pages 1355-1373, December.
    10. Rapson Gomez & Vasileios Stavropoulos & Mark D Griffiths, 2020. "Confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modelling of the factor structure of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales-21," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Rocío Juliá-Sanchis & María José Cabañero-Martínez & César Leal-Costa & Manuel Fernández-Alcántara & Silvia Escribano, 2020. "Psychometric Properties of the Health Professionals Communication Skills Scale in University Students of Health Sciences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-11, October.
    12. Angel Christopher Zegarra-López & Giancarlo Luna-Victoria & Daniella Romero-Montenegro & Brian Florentino-Santisteban & Diego Eduardo Prieto-Molinari & Mitchell Montoya-Cuadrao, 2022. "Prevalence and Predictors of Somatization in Peruvian Undergraduate Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-12, November.
    13. Samuel Green & Yanyun Yang, 2009. "Commentary on Coefficient Alpha: A Cautionary Tale," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 121-135, March.
    14. Elisa Menardo & Margherita Brondino & Margherita Pasini, 2020. "Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Pro-Environmental Behaviours Scale (PEBS)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(7), pages 6907-6930, October.
    15. Alessandra Ricciardelli & Nicola Capolupo & Paola Adinolfi & Gianluigi Mangia, 2024. "Unveiling the Good and Evil of Organisational Power: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(2), pages 1-1, March.
    16. Nicola Capolupo & Zuzana Virglerova & Angelo Rosa & Dario Natale Palmucci, 2024. "The relationship between biases and entrepreneurial Decision-Making. Evidence from Italian and Czech SMEs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 3323-3348, December.
    17. Kristen Smith & Keston Fulcher & Elizabeth Hawk Sanchez, 2017. "Ethical Reasoning in Action: Validity Evidence for the Ethical Reasoning Identification Test (ERIT)," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 417-436, August.
    18. Tchetchik, Anat & Zvi, Liat I. & Kaplan, Sigal & Blass, Vered, 2020. "The joint effects of driving hedonism and trialability on the choice between internal combustion engine, hybrid, and electric vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    19. Markus Pauly & Maria Umlauft & Ali Ünlü, 2018. "Resampling-Based Inference Methods for Comparing Two Coefficients Alpha," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 203-222, March.
    20. Rudolph, Julia & Niepel, Christoph & Greiff, Samuel & Goldhammer, Frank & Kröner, Stephan, 2017. "Metacognitive confidence judgments and their link to complex problem solving," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-8.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:3101-:d:765275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.