IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i5p2503-d755346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Generic and Disease-Specific Measures to Assess Quality of Life before and after 12 Months of Hearing Implant Use: A Prospective, Longitudinal, Multicenter, Observational Clinical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Lassaletta

    (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, 28046 Madrid, Spain
    Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Institute of Health Carlos III, (CIBERER-U761), 28029 Madrid, Spain)

  • Miryam Calvino

    (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, 28046 Madrid, Spain
    Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Institute of Health Carlos III, (CIBERER-U761), 28029 Madrid, Spain)

  • Isabel Sanchez-Cuadrado

    (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, 28046 Madrid, Spain)

  • Piotr Henryk Skarzynski

    (Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, 05-830 Kajetany, Poland)

  • Katarzyna B. Cywka

    (Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, 05-830 Kajetany, Poland)

  • Natalia Czajka

    (Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, 05-830 Kajetany, Poland)

  • Justyna Kutyba

    (Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, 05-830 Kajetany, Poland)

  • Dayse Tavora-Vieira

    (Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth 6150, Australia)

  • Paul van de Heyning

    (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Griet Mertens

    (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Hinrich Staecker

    (ENT Department, University of Kansas Medical Centre, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA)

  • Bryan Humphrey

    (ENT Department, University of Kansas Medical Centre, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA)

  • Mario Zernotti

    (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sanatorio Allende de Córdoba, Córdoba 5000, Argentina)

  • Maximo Zernotti

    (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sanatorio Allende de Córdoba, Córdoba 5000, Argentina)

  • Astrid Magele

    (ENT Department, Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria)

  • Marlene Ploder

    (ENT Department, Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria)

  • Julia Speranza Zabeu

    (Hospital de Reabilitacão de Anomalias Craniofaciais da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Campus Bauru, Bauru 17012-230, Brazil)

Abstract

The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of hearing implant (HI) use on quality of life (QoL) and to determine which QoL measure(s) quantify QoL with greater sensitivity in users of different types of HIs. Participants were adult cochlear implant (CI), active middle ear implant (VIBRANT SOUNDBRIDGE (VSB)), or active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (the BONEBRIDGE (BB)) recipients. Generic QoL and disease-specific QoL were assessed at three intervals: pre-activation, 6 months of device use, and 12 months of device use. 169 participants completed the study (110 CI, 18VSB, and 41BB). CI users’ QoL significantly increased from 0–6 m device use on both the generic- and the disease-specific measures. On some device-specific measures, their QoL also significantly increased between 6 and 12 m device use. VSB users’ QoL significantly increased between all tested intervals with the disease-specific measure but not the generic measure. BB users’ QoL significantly increased from 0–6 m device use on both the generic- and the disease-specific measures. In sum, HI users experienced significant postoperative increases in QoL within their first 12 m of device use, especially when disease-specific measures were used. Disease-specific QoL measures appeared to be more sensitive than their generic counterparts.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Lassaletta & Miryam Calvino & Isabel Sanchez-Cuadrado & Piotr Henryk Skarzynski & Katarzyna B. Cywka & Natalia Czajka & Justyna Kutyba & Dayse Tavora-Vieira & Paul van de Heyning & Griet Mertens , 2022. "Using Generic and Disease-Specific Measures to Assess Quality of Life before and after 12 Months of Hearing Implant Use: A Prospective, Longitudinal, Multicenter, Observational Clinical Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2503-:d:755346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2503/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2503/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeff Richardson & Angelo Iezzi & Munir Khan & Aimee Maxwell, 2014. "Validity and Reliability of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 7(1), pages 85-96, March.
    2. Miklós Weszl & Fanni Rencz & Valentin Brodszky, 2019. "Is the trend of increasing use of patient-reported outcome measures in medical device studies the sign of shift towards value-based purchasing in Europe?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(1), pages 133-140, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beata GAVUROVA & Matus KUBAK & Martin MIKESKA, 2020. "The Efficiency Of Public Procurement In The Health Sector – The Platform On Sustainable Public Finances," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(35), pages 21-39, December.
    2. Geke Romijn & Neeltje Batelaan & Jeroen Koning & Anton van Balkom & Aart de Leeuw & Friederike Benning & Leona Hakkaart van Roijen & Heleen Riper, 2021. "Acceptability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of blended cognitive-behavioural therapy (bCBT) versus face-to-face CBT (ftfCBT) for anxiety disorders in specialised mental health care: A 15-week ," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Julie A. Campbell & Douglas Ezzy & Amanda Neil & Martin Hensher & Alison Venn & Melanie J. Sharman & Andrew J. Palmer, 2018. "A qualitative investigation of the health economic impacts of bariatric surgery for obesity and implications for improved practice in health economics," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(8), pages 1300-1318, August.
    4. Wan Hua Sim & Anthony F. Jorm & Marie B. H. Yap, 2022. "The Role of Parent Engagement in a Web-Based Preventive Parenting Intervention for Child Mental Health in Predicting Parenting, Parent and Child Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Edward J. D. Webb & Paul Kind & David Meads & Adam Martin, 2021. "Does a health crisis change how we value health?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(10), pages 2547-2560, September.
    6. Suparna Saha & Sanghamitra Basu & Debapratim Pandit, 2022. "Identifying Factors Influencing Perceived Quality of Life (QoL) of Indian Elderly: Case Study of Kolkata, India," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 867-907, April.
    7. Alice Minghetti & Lars Donath & Henner Hanssen & Ralf Roth & Eric Lichtenstein & Lukas Zahner & Oliver Faude, 2022. "Physical Performance, Cardiovascular Health and Psychosocial Wellbeing in Older Adults Compared to Oldest-Old Residential Seniors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Lamu, Admassu N. & Olsen, Jan Abel, 2016. "The relative importance of health, income and social relations for subjective well-being: An integrative analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 176-185.
    9. Tom Lung & Kirsten Howard & Christopher Etherton-Beer & Moira Sim & Gill Lewin & Glenn Arendts, 2017. "Comparison of the HUI3 and the EQ-5D-3L in a nursing home setting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-10, February.
    10. Lei Si & Liudan Tu & Ya Xie & Gang Chen & Mickaël Hiligsmann & Mingcan Yang & Yanli Zhang & Xi Zhang & Yutong Jiang & Qiujing Wei & Jieruo Gu & Andrew J. Palmer, 2022. "Evaluating Health Related Quality of Life in Older People at Risk of Osteoporotic Fracture: A Head-to-Head Comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-6D," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 809-824, April.
    11. Admassu N. Lamu & Jan Abel Olsen, 2018. "Yes, health is important, but as much for its importance via social life: The direct and indirect effects of health on subjective well‐being in chronically ill individuals," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 209-222, January.
    12. Antonio Cuesta-Vargas & Jaime Martin-Martin & Manuel Gonzalez-Sanchez & Jose Antonio Merchan-Baeza & David Perez-Cruzado, 2020. "Identification of Tools for the Functional and Subjective Assessment of Patients in an Aquatic Environment: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-14, August.
    13. Tessa Peasgood & Clara Mukuria & Jill Carlton & Janice Connell & Nancy Devlin & Karen Jones & Rosemary Lovett & Bhash Naidoo & Stacey Rand & Juan Carlos Rejon-Parrilla & Donna Rowen & Aki Tsuchiya & J, 2021. "What is the best approach to adopt for identifying the domains for a new measure of health, social care and carer-related quality of life to measure quality-adjusted life years? Application to the dev," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(7), pages 1067-1081, September.
    14. Lina Braun & Yannik Terhorst & Ingrid Titzler & Johanna Freund & Janika Thielecke & David Daniel Ebert & Harald Baumeister, 2022. "Lessons Learned from an Attempted Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial for Improvement of Chronic Pain-Associated Disability in Green Professions: Long-Term Effectiveness of a Guided Online-Based Acc," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-24, October.
    15. Luis Lassaletta & Miryam Calvino & Isabel Sanchez-Cuadrado & Piotr Henryk Skarzynski & Katarzyna B. Cywka & Natalia Czajka & Justyna Kutyba & Dayse Tavora-Vieira & Paul Van de Heyning & Griet Mertens , 2023. "QoL, CIs, QALYs, and Individualized Rehabilitation: The Clinical and Practical Benefits of Regularly Assessing the Quality of Life of Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(20), pages 1-13, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2503-:d:755346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.