IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i4p2151-d748988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Knowledge and Attitudes of Faculty Members towards Inclusive Education for Students with Disabilities: Evidence from a Greek University

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Papadakaki

    (Department of Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71004 Heraklion, Greece)

  • Anastasia Maraki

    (Department of Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71004 Heraklion, Greece)

  • Nikolaos Bitsakos

    (Department of Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71004 Heraklion, Greece)

  • Joannes Chliaoutakis

    (Department of Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71004 Heraklion, Greece)

Abstract

The current paper aimed at investigating factors affecting the perceptions and attitudes of faculty members towards inclusive education for students with disabilities in a Greek University. A questionnaire, based on the “Expanding Cultural Awareness of Exceptional Learners-ExCEL” was distributed online to 311 faculty members, during the first semester of 2020. The questionnaire explored participants’ sociodemographic and academic background, prior training and personal experience with disability, perceived knowledge, beliefs and attitudes towards inclusive education practices. A total of 80 questionnaires were completed (males 56.3%; aged 41–50 years 43.7%; working experience > 16 years 52.4%; prior training on disability 77.5%). Factor analysis identified four constructs relevant to: (a) perceived knowledge regarding the legal framework (“Perceived Knowledge”), (b) intention towards the provision of general accommodations in class (“Help in Class”), (c) intention towards resource provision (“Material Offer”), and (d) beliefs about the provision of accommodations to students with disabilities (“Negative Attitude”). Gender, faculty subject and prior training on disability were shown to affect the participants’ “Perceived Knowledge”, while working position was shown to affect “Material Offer”. Age, working experience, and personal experience with disability did not reveal any significant effect. More research is needed to investigate the attitudinal and practical barriers of faculty members towards meeting students’ educational needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Papadakaki & Anastasia Maraki & Nikolaos Bitsakos & Joannes Chliaoutakis, 2022. "Perceived Knowledge and Attitudes of Faculty Members towards Inclusive Education for Students with Disabilities: Evidence from a Greek University," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2151-:d:748988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2151/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2151/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marios A. Pappas & Chara Papoutsi & Athanasios S. Drigas, 2018. "Policies, Practices, and Attitudes toward Inclusive Education: The Case of Greece," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Moriña, Anabel & Carballo, Rafael, 2017. "The impact of a faculty training program on inclusive education and disability," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 77-83.
    3. Rosa-Eva Valle-Flórez & Ana María de Caso Fuertes & Roberto Baelo & Sheila García-Martín, 2021. "Faculty of Education Professors’ Perception about the Inclusion of University Students with Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Shanyong Wang & Jin Fan & Dingtao Zhao & Shu Yang & Yuanguang Fu, 2016. "Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 123-143, January.
    5. Shanyong Wang & Jin Fan & Dingtao Zhao & Shu Yang & Yuanguang Fu, 2016. "Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 123-143, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camelia Stăiculescu & Violeta Mihaela Dincă & Andreea Gheba, 2022. "Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Favorable Participation of Students with Special Needs in Public Tertiary Education in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Zhihui Wang & Liangzhen Nie & Eila Jeronen & Lihua Xu & Meiai Chen, 2023. "Understanding the Environmentally Sustainable Behavior of Chinese University Students as Tourists: An Integrative Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Sara Sousa & Elisabete Correia & Clara Viseu, 2024. "Exploring Portuguese Consumers’ Behavior Regarding Sustainable Wine: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Wei Zheng & Hongliang Qiu & Alastair M. Morrison, 2023. "Applying a Combination of SEM and fsQCA to Predict Tourist Resource-Saving Behavioral Intentions in Rural Tourism: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Ming (Bryan) Wang & Li Zhao & Abigail L. Cochran, 2024. "Sentiments of Rural U.S. Communities on Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure: Insights from Twitter Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Shah, Sayed Kifayat & Zhongjun, Tang & Sattar, Abdul & XinHao, Zhou, 2021. "Consumer's intention to purchase 5G: Do environmental awareness, environmental knowledge and health consciousness attitude matter?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. Chien-Chi Lin & Chih-Ming Dong, 2023. "Exploring Consumers’ Purchase Intention on Energy-Efficient Home Appliances: Integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior, Perceived Value Theory, and Environmental Awareness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Liu, Hu-Chen & You, Xiao-Yue & Xue, Yi-Xi & Luan, Xue, 2017. "Exploring critical factors influencing the diffusion of electric vehicles in China: A multi-stakeholder perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 46-58.
    9. Andriosopoulos, Kostas & Bigerna, Simona & Bollino, Carlo Andrea & Micheli, Silvia, 2018. "The impact of age on Italian consumers' attitude toward alternative fuel vehicles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 299-308.
    10. María García de Blanes Sebastián & José Ramón Sarmiento Guede & Alberto Azuara Grande & David Juárez-Varón, 2024. "Analysis of factors influencing attitude and intention to use electric vehicles for a sustainable future," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1347-1368, August.
    11. Michels, Marius & Bonke, Vanessa & Wever, Hendrik & Musshoff, Oliver, 2024. "Understanding farmers' intention to buy alternative fuel tractors in German agriculture applying the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    12. Taneja, Shilpa & Ali, Liaqat, 2021. "Determinants of customers’ intentions towards environmentally sustainable banking: Testing the structural model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    13. Jing Shao & Wenchao Li & Cedric Aneye & Wei Fang, 2022. "Facilitating mechanism of green products purchasing with a premium price—Moderating by sustainability‐related information," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 686-700, May.
    14. Mashaal A. M. Saif & Nazimah Hussin & Maizaitulaidawati Md Husin & Ayed Alwadain & Ayon Chakraborty, 2022. "Determinants of the Intention to Adopt Digital-Only Banks in Malaysia: The Extension of Environmental Concern," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-32, September.
    15. Shanmugavel, Nagarajan & Balakrishnan, Janarthanan, 2023. "Influence of pro-environmental behaviour towards behavioural intention of electric vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    16. Ying Sun & Biao Luo & Shanyong Wang & Wenpei Fang, 2021. "What you see is meaningful: Does green advertising change the intentions of consumers to purchase eco‐labeled products?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 694-704, January.
    17. Nadia Palmieri & Roberto Tomasone & Carla Cedrola & Daniele Puri & Mauro Pagano, 2023. "Factors Affecting Disabled Consumer Preferences for an Electric Vehicle for Rural Mobility: An Italian Experimental Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Peng Jing & Hao Huang & Bin Ran & Fengping Zhan & Yuji Shi, 2019. "Exploring the Factors Affecting Mode Choice Intention of Autonomous Vehicle Based on an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior—A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    19. Qiying Ding & Shoufu Lin & Shanyong Wang, 2022. "Determinants and Willingness to Pay for Purchasing Mask against COVID-19: A Protection Motivation Theory Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, April.
    20. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Developing a Sustainable Omnichannel Strategic Framework toward Circular Revolution: An Integrated Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2151-:d:748988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.