IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15674-d983842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilizing a Nordic Crosswalk for Occupational Coding in an Analysis on Occupation-Specific Prolonged Sickness Absence among 7 Million Employees in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Svetlana Solovieva

    (Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 0032 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Karina Undem

    (National Institute of Occupational Health (STAMI), 0363 Oslo, Norway)

  • Daniel Falkstedt

    (Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Gun Johansson

    (Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Petter Kristensen

    (National Institute of Occupational Health (STAMI), 0363 Oslo, Norway)

  • Jacob Pedersen

    (National Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Eira Viikari-Juntura

    (Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 0032 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Taina Leinonen

    (Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 0032 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum

    (National Institute of Occupational Health (STAMI), 0363 Oslo, Norway
    Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, 0450 Oslo, Norway)

Abstract

We identified occupations with a high incidence of prolonged sickness absence (SA) in Nordic employees and explored similarities and differences between the countries. Utilizing data from national registers on 25–59-year-old wage-earners from Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, we estimated the gender- and occupation-specific age-adjusted cumulative incidence of SA due to any cause, musculoskeletal diseases and mental disorders. To increase the comparability of occupations between the countries, we developed a Nordic crosswalk for occupational codes. We ranked occupational groups with the incidence of SA being statistically significantly higher than the population average of the country in question and calculated excess fractions with the employee population being the reference group. We observed considerable occupational differences in SA within and between the countries. Few occupational groups had a high incidence in all countries, particularly for mental disorders among men. In each country, manual occupations typically had a high incidence of SA due to any cause and musculoskeletal diseases, while service occupations had a high incidence due to mental disorders. Preventive measures targeted at specific occupational groups have a high potential to reduce work disability, especially due to musculoskeletal diseases. Particularly groups with excess SA in all Nordic countries could be at focus.

Suggested Citation

  • Svetlana Solovieva & Karina Undem & Daniel Falkstedt & Gun Johansson & Petter Kristensen & Jacob Pedersen & Eira Viikari-Juntura & Taina Leinonen & Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum, 2022. "Utilizing a Nordic Crosswalk for Occupational Coding in an Analysis on Occupation-Specific Prolonged Sickness Absence among 7 Million Employees in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-24, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15674-:d:983842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15674/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15674/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petri Böckerman & Ohto Kanninen & Ilpo Suoniemi, 2018. "A kink that makes you sick: The effect of sick pay on absence," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 568-579, June.
    2. Philip Hemmings & Christopher Prinz, 2020. "Sickness and disability systems: comparing outcomes and policies in Norway with those in Sweden, the Netherlands and Switzerland," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1601, OECD Publishing.
    3. Tim A. Barmby & Marco G. Ercolani & John G. Treble, 2002. "Sickness Absence: An International Comparison," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(480), pages 315-331, June.
    4. Puhani, Patrick A. & Sonderhof, Katja, 2010. "The effects of a sick pay reform on absence and on health-related outcomes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 285-302, March.
    5. Ose, Solveig Osborg & Kaspersen, Silje Lill & Leinonen, Taina & Verstappen, Suzanne & de Rijk, Angelique & Spasova, Slavina & Hultqvist, Sara & Nørup, Iben & Pálsson, Jón R. & Blume, Andreas & Paterno, 2022. "Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees: A comparison of nine north-western European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(7), pages 619-631.
    6. Elżbieta Antczak & Katarzyna M. Miszczyńska, 2021. "Causes of Sickness Absenteeism in Europe—Analysis from an Intercountry and Gender Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Rigmar Osterkamp & Oliver Röhn, 2007. "Being on Sick Leave: Possible Explanations for Differences of Sick-leave Days Across Countries," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 53(1), pages 97-114, March.
    8. Jenni Blomgren & Sauli Jäppinen, 2021. "Incidence and Length of Sickness Absence among Hierarchical Occupational Classes and Non-Wage-Earners: A Register Study of 1.6 Million Finns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Matilde Leonor Alba-Jurado & María José Aguado-Benedí & Noelia Moreno-Morales & Maria Teresa Labajos-Manzanares & Rocío Martín-Valero, 2021. "Occupation and Sickness Absence in the Different Autonomous Communities of Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-12, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. René Böheim & Thomas Leoni, 2014. "Firms' Sickness Costs and Workers' Sickness Absences," NBER Working Papers 20305, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Nicolas R. Ziebarth & Martin Karlsson, 2014. "The Effects Of Expanding The Generosity Of The Statutory Sickness Insurance System," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 208-230, March.
    3. Duersch, Peter & Oechssler, Jörg & Vadovic, Radovan, 2012. "Sick pay provision in experimental labor markets," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 1-19.
    4. Livanos, Ilias & Zangelidis, Alexandros, 2010. "Sickness Absence: a Pan-European Study," MPRA Paper 22627, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Pouliakas, Konstantinos & Theodossiou, Ioannis, 2010. "An Inquiry Into The Theory, Causes And Consequences Of Monitoring Indicators Of Health And Safety At Work," SIRE Discussion Papers 2010-120, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    6. Sebastien Menard, 2021. "Optimal sickness benefits in a principal–agent model," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(1), pages 5-33, July.
    7. Daniel S. J. Lechmann & Claus Schnabel, 2014. "Absence from Work of the Self-Employed: A Comparison with Paid Employees," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 368-390, August.
    8. Cornelissen, Thomas & Himmler, Oliver & Koenig, Tobias, 2013. "Fairness spillovers—The case of taxation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 164-180.
    9. Stephanie Prümer & Claus Schnabel, 2019. "Questioning the Stereotype of the “Malingering Bureaucrat”: Absence from Work in the Public and Private Sector in Germany," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 570-603, November.
    10. Martin Ljunge, 2011. "Sick of Taxes? Evidence on the Elasticity of Labor Supply when Workers Are Free to Choose," Discussion Papers 11-27, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    11. Evangelos C. Alexopoulos & Georgios Merekoulias & Dimitra Tanagra & Eleni C. Konstantinou & Efi Mikelatou & Eleni Jelastopulu, 2012. "Sickness Absence in the Private Sector of Greece: Comparing Shipyard Industry and National Insurance Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-11, April.
    12. Chadi, Adrian & Goerke, Laszlo, 2018. "Missing at work – Sickness-related absence and subsequent career events," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 153-176.
    13. Ose, Solveig Osborg & Kaspersen, Silje Lill & Leinonen, Taina & Verstappen, Suzanne & de Rijk, Angelique & Spasova, Slavina & Hultqvist, Sara & Nørup, Iben & Pálsson, Jón R. & Blume, Andreas & Paterno, 2022. "Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees: A comparison of nine north-western European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(7), pages 619-631.
    14. Kieu‐Dung Nguyen & Van‐AnhThi Tran & Duc‐Thanh Nguyen, 2021. "Social insurance reform and absenteeism in Vietnam," International Journal of Social Welfare, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 193-207, April.
    15. René Böheim & Thomas Leoni, 2020. "Do Employees’ Sickness Absences React to a Change in Costs for Firms? Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 122(2), pages 553-581, April.
    16. Sabine Chaupain-Guillot & Olivier Guillot, 2010. "Les déterminants individuels des absences au travail : une comparaison européenne," Working Papers of BETA 2010-17, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    17. Thomas Leoni & Helmut Mahringer, 2008. "Fehlzeitenreport 2008. Krankheits- und unfallbedingte Fehlzeiten in Österreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 34220, March.
    18. repec:lan:wpaper:2935 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. David S. Lee & Pauline Leung & Christopher J. O’Leary & Zhuan Pei & Simon Quach, 2021. "Are Sufficient Statistics Necessary? Nonparametric Measurement of Deadweight Loss from Unemployment Insurance," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(S2), pages 455-506.
    20. Stijn Baert & Bas van der Klaauw & Gijsbert van Lomwel, 2018. "The effectiveness of medical and vocational interventions for reducing sick leave of self‐employed workers," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 139-152, February.
    21. Boris HirschBy & Daniel S. J. Lechmann & Claus Schnabel, 2017. "Coming to work while sick: an economic theory of presenteeism with an application to German data," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 69(4), pages 1010-1031.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15674-:d:983842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.