IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p15058-d973870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Different Typologies of Gamers Are Associated with Mental Health: Are Students DOOMed?

Author

Listed:
  • Turi Reiten Finserås

    (Department of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 5015 Bergen, Norway)

  • Børge Sivertsen

    (Department of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 5015 Bergen, Norway
    Department of Research and Innovation, Helse Fonna HF, 5525 Haugesund, Norway
    Department of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7034 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Ståle Pallesen

    (Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, 5015 Bergen, Norway
    Norwegian Competence Center for Gambling and Gaming Research, University of Bergen, 5015 Bergen, Norway)

  • Tony Leino

    (Department of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 5015 Bergen, Norway)

  • Rune Aune Mentzoni

    (Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, 5015 Bergen, Norway
    Norwegian Competence Center for Gambling and Gaming Research, University of Bergen, 5015 Bergen, Norway)

  • Jens Christoffer Skogen

    (Department of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 5015 Bergen, Norway
    Centre for Evaluation of Public Health Measures, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0473 Oslo, Norway
    Alcohol and Drug Research Western Norway, Stavanger University Hospital, 4068 Stavanger, Norway)

Abstract

(1) Background: The inclusion of Internet Gaming Disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM-5) led to a rapid development of assessment instruments based on the suggested diagnosis. However, previous studies suggest that some of the symptoms in the diagnosis reflect engagement in gaming rather than a disorder or addiction. The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to investigate mental health associations with different typologies of gamers. (2) Methods: Data stemmed from a large national survey of students (SHoT2022) that was conducted between February and April 2022 (N = 59,544). Participants were categorized into non-gamers, recreational gamers, engaged gamers, problematic gamers, and addicted gamers. Logistic regression models adjusted for age were analyzed with and without gender-stratification for mental distress and life satisfaction as dependent variables across gaming categories. (3) Results: The proportion reporting case-level mental distress was lower for recreational gamers compared to non-gamers, indicating fewer mental health problems for recreational gamers. However, after stratifying the analysis by gender, female recreational gamers had higher levels of mental distress compared to female non-gamers, reflecting Simpson’s paradox. (4) Conclusions: Future studies investigating mental health and gaming should include a gender perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Turi Reiten Finserås & Børge Sivertsen & Ståle Pallesen & Tony Leino & Rune Aune Mentzoni & Jens Christoffer Skogen, 2022. "Different Typologies of Gamers Are Associated with Mental Health: Are Students DOOMed?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15058-:d:973870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15058/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15058/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald R. Rindfuss & Minja K. Choe & Noriko O. Tsuya & Larry L. Bumpass & Emi Tamaki, 2015. "Do low survey response rates bias results? Evidence from Japan," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(26), pages 797-828.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirsten Barnicot & Rose McCabe & Angeliki Bogosian & Renos Papadopoulos & Mike Crawford & Peter Aitken & Tanja Christensen & Jonathan Wilson & Bonnie Teague & Ravi Rana & Donna Willis & Ryan Barclay &, 2023. "Predictors of Post-Traumatic Growth in a Sample of United Kingdom Mental and Community Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Ali Bakdur & Fumito Masui & Michal Ptaszynski, 2021. "Predicting Increase in Demand for Public Buses in University Students Daily Life Needs: Case Study Based on a City in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, May.
    3. Lotte De Schrijver & Elizaveta Fomenko & Barbara Krahé & Kristien Roelens & Tom Vander Beken & Ines Keygnaert, 2022. "Minority Identity, Othering-Based Stress, and Sexual Violence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Reynaud, Arnaud & Lanzanova, Denis & Liquete, Camino & Grizzetti, Bruna, 2017. "Going green? Ex-post valuation of a multipurpose water infrastructure in Northern Italy," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PA), pages 70-81.
    5. David Antonio Sánchez-Páez & José Antonio Ortega, 2018. "Adolescent contraceptive use and its effects on fertility," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 38(45), pages 1359-1388.
    6. Rueyling Tzeng & Ming-Chang Tsai, 2020. "Good for the Common Good: Sociotropic Concern and Double Standards toward High- and Low-Skilled Immigrants in Six Wealthy Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 473-493, November.
    7. Ulrich J Frey & Frauke Pirscher, 2019. "Distinguishing protest responses in contingent valuation: A conceptualization of motivations and attitudes behind them," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Kerry Nield & Ardyn T. Nordstrom, 2016. "Response Bias in Voluntary Surveys: An Empirical Analysis of the Canadian Census," Carleton Economic Papers 16-10, Carleton University, Department of Economics, revised 09 Aug 2016.
    9. Herberholz, Chantal, 2020. "Risk attitude, time preference and health behaviours in the Bangkok Metropolitan Area," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    10. Okamoto, Shohei & Avendano, Mauricio & Kawachi, Ichiro, 2019. "Intergenerational income mobility and health in Japan: A quasi-experimental approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 37-48.
    11. Martin Piotrowski & Erik Bond & Ann Beutel, 2020. "Marriage counterfactuals in Japan: Variation by gender, marital status, and time," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(37), pages 1081-1118.
    12. Aistė Kavaliauskienė & Antanas Šidlauskas & Miglė Žemaitienė & Eglė Slabšinskienė & Apolinaras Zaborskis, 2020. "Relationships of Dental Caries and Malocclusion with Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Lithuanian Adolescents Aged 15 to 18 Years: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, June.
    13. William Checkley & Shakir Hossen & Ghislaine Rosa & Lisa M. Thompson & John P. McCracken & Anaite Diaz-Artiga & Kalpana Balakrishnan & Suzanne M. Simkovich & Lindsay J. Underhill & Laura Nicolaou & St, 2022. "Facing the Realities of Pragmatic Design Choices in Environmental Health Studies: Experiences from the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-12, March.
    14. Wei-hsin Yu & Janet Chen-Lan Kuo, 2017. "Another work-family interface: Work characteristics and family intentions in Japan," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 36(13), pages 391-426.
    15. Pauline Swee Choo Goh & Chee Luen Loy, 2021. "Factors Influencing Malaysian Preschool Teachers’ Use of the English Language as a Medium of Instruction," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    16. Man-Yee Kan & Ekaterina Hertog, 2017. "Domestic division of labour and fertility preference in China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 36(18), pages 557-588.
    17. J. Jona Schellekens, 2019. "Explaining Disability Trends in the United States, 1963–2015," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 45(4), pages 819-834, December.
    18. Eliza Lai-Yi Wong & Kin-Fai Ho & Dong Dong & Annie Wai-Ling Cheung & Peter Sen-Yung Yau & Emily Ying-Yang Chan & Eng-Kiong Yeoh & Wai-Tong Chien & Frank Youhua Chen & Simon Poon & Qingpeng Zhang & Sam, 2021. "Compliance with Standard Precautions and Its Relationship with Views on Infection Control and Prevention Policy among Healthcare Workers during COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-11, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15058-:d:973870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.