IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i7p3790-d777330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facing the Realities of Pragmatic Design Choices in Environmental Health Studies: Experiences from the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial

Author

Listed:
  • William Checkley

    (Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
    Center for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA)

  • Shakir Hossen

    (Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
    Center for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA)

  • Ghislaine Rosa

    (Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, London WC1E 7HT, UK)

  • Lisa M. Thompson

    (Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA)

  • John P. McCracken

    (Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30606, USA)

  • Anaite Diaz-Artiga

    (Center for Health Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City 01015, Guatemala)

  • Kalpana Balakrishnan

    (ICMR Center for Advanced Research on Air Quality, Climate and Health, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Sri Ramachandra Institute for Higher Education and Research, Chennai 600116, India)

  • Suzanne M. Simkovich

    (Division of Healthcare Delivery Research, Medstar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA
    Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA)

  • Lindsay J. Underhill

    (Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
    Center for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA)

  • Laura Nicolaou

    (Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
    Center for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA)

  • Stella M. Hartinger

    (Latin American Center of Excellence on Climate Change and Health, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima 15102, Peru)

  • Victor G. Davila-Roman

    (Cardiovascular Imaging and Clinical Research Core Laboratory, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA)

  • Miles A. Kirby

    (Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • Thomas F. Clasen

    (Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Joshua Rosenthal

    (Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA)

  • Jennifer L. Peel

    (Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA)

  • on behalf of Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) Investigators

    (Mermbeship of the HAPIN investigators is provided in the acknowelegement.)

Abstract

Objective: Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) investigators tested a complex, non-pharmacological intervention in four low- and middle-income countries as a strategy to mitigate household air pollution and improve health outcomes across the lifespan. Intervention households received a liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) stove, continuous fuel delivery and regular behavioral reinforcements for 18 months, whereas controls were asked to continue with usual cooking practices. While HAPIN was designed as an explanatory trial to test the efficacy of the intervention on four primary outcomes, it introduced several pragmatic aspects in its design and conduct that resemble real-life conditions. We surveyed HAPIN investigators and asked them to rank what aspects of the design and conduct they considered were more pragmatic than explanatory. Methods: We used the revised Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS-2) to survey investigators on the degree of pragmatism in nine domains of trial design and conduct using a five-point Likert rank scale from very explanatory (1) to very pragmatic (5). We invited 103 investigators. Participants were given educational material on PRECIS-2, including presentations, papers and examples that described the use and implementation of PRECIS-2. Results: Thirty-five investigators (mean age 42 years, 51% female) participated in the survey. Overall, only 17% ranked all domains as very explanatory, with an average (±SD) rank of 3.2 ± 1.4 across domains. Fewer than 20% of investigators ranked eligibility, recruitment or setting as very explanatory. In contrast, ≥50% of investigators ranked the trial organization, delivery and adherence of the intervention and follow-up as very/rather explanatory whereas ≤17% ranked them as rather/very pragmatic. Finally, <25% of investigators ranked the relevance of outcomes to participants and analysis as very/rather explanatory whereas ≥50% ranked then as rather/very pragmatic. In-country partners were more likely to rank domains as pragmatic when compared to investigators working in central coordination (average rank 3.2 vs. 2.8, respectively; Wilcoxon rank-sum p < 0.001). Conclusion: HAPIN investigators did not consider their efficacy trial to be rather/very explanatory and reported that some aspects of the design and conduct were executed under real-world conditions; however, they also did not consider the trial to be overly pragmatic. Our analysis underscores the importance of using standardized tools such as PRECIS-2 to guide early discussions among investigators in the design of environmental health trials attempting to measure efficacy.

Suggested Citation

  • William Checkley & Shakir Hossen & Ghislaine Rosa & Lisa M. Thompson & John P. McCracken & Anaite Diaz-Artiga & Kalpana Balakrishnan & Suzanne M. Simkovich & Lindsay J. Underhill & Laura Nicolaou & St, 2022. "Facing the Realities of Pragmatic Design Choices in Environmental Health Studies: Experiences from the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:3790-:d:777330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/3790/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/3790/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald R. Rindfuss & Minja K. Choe & Noriko O. Tsuya & Larry L. Bumpass & Emi Tamaki, 2015. "Do low survey response rates bias results? Evidence from Japan," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(26), pages 797-828.
    2. Ashlinn K. Quinn & Kendra N. Williams & Lisa M. Thompson & Steven A. Harvey & Ricardo Piedrahita & Jiantong Wang & Casey Quinn & Ajay Pillarisetti & John P. McCracken & Joshua P. Rosenthal & Miles A. , 2021. "Fidelity and Adherence to a Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stove and Fuel Intervention during Gestation: The Multi-Country Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirsten Barnicot & Rose McCabe & Angeliki Bogosian & Renos Papadopoulos & Mike Crawford & Peter Aitken & Tanja Christensen & Jonathan Wilson & Bonnie Teague & Ravi Rana & Donna Willis & Ryan Barclay &, 2023. "Predictors of Post-Traumatic Growth in a Sample of United Kingdom Mental and Community Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Perros, T. & Allison, A.L. & Tomei, J. & Aketch, V. & Parikh, P., 2023. "Cleaning up the stack: Evaluating a clean cooking fuel stacking intervention in urban Kenya," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Ali Bakdur & Fumito Masui & Michal Ptaszynski, 2021. "Predicting Increase in Demand for Public Buses in University Students Daily Life Needs: Case Study Based on a City in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, May.
    4. Lotte De Schrijver & Elizaveta Fomenko & Barbara Krahé & Kristien Roelens & Tom Vander Beken & Ines Keygnaert, 2022. "Minority Identity, Othering-Based Stress, and Sexual Violence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Reynaud, Arnaud & Lanzanova, Denis & Liquete, Camino & Grizzetti, Bruna, 2017. "Going green? Ex-post valuation of a multipurpose water infrastructure in Northern Italy," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PA), pages 70-81.
    6. David Antonio Sánchez-Páez & José Antonio Ortega, 2018. "Adolescent contraceptive use and its effects on fertility," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 38(45), pages 1359-1388.
    7. Rueyling Tzeng & Ming-Chang Tsai, 2020. "Good for the Common Good: Sociotropic Concern and Double Standards toward High- and Low-Skilled Immigrants in Six Wealthy Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 473-493, November.
    8. Ulrich J Frey & Frauke Pirscher, 2019. "Distinguishing protest responses in contingent valuation: A conceptualization of motivations and attitudes behind them," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Kerry Nield & Ardyn T. Nordstrom, 2016. "Response Bias in Voluntary Surveys: An Empirical Analysis of the Canadian Census," Carleton Economic Papers 16-10, Carleton University, Department of Economics, revised 09 Aug 2016.
    10. Herberholz, Chantal, 2020. "Risk attitude, time preference and health behaviours in the Bangkok Metropolitan Area," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Turi Reiten Finserås & Børge Sivertsen & Ståle Pallesen & Tony Leino & Rune Aune Mentzoni & Jens Christoffer Skogen, 2022. "Different Typologies of Gamers Are Associated with Mental Health: Are Students DOOMed?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-13, November.
    12. Okamoto, Shohei & Avendano, Mauricio & Kawachi, Ichiro, 2019. "Intergenerational income mobility and health in Japan: A quasi-experimental approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 37-48.
    13. Martin Piotrowski & Erik Bond & Ann Beutel, 2020. "Marriage counterfactuals in Japan: Variation by gender, marital status, and time," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(37), pages 1081-1118.
    14. Aistė Kavaliauskienė & Antanas Šidlauskas & Miglė Žemaitienė & Eglė Slabšinskienė & Apolinaras Zaborskis, 2020. "Relationships of Dental Caries and Malocclusion with Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Lithuanian Adolescents Aged 15 to 18 Years: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Wei-hsin Yu & Janet Chen-Lan Kuo, 2017. "Another work-family interface: Work characteristics and family intentions in Japan," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 36(13), pages 391-426.
    16. Pauline Swee Choo Goh & Chee Luen Loy, 2021. "Factors Influencing Malaysian Preschool Teachers’ Use of the English Language as a Medium of Instruction," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    17. Man-Yee Kan & Ekaterina Hertog, 2017. "Domestic division of labour and fertility preference in China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 36(18), pages 557-588.
    18. J. Jona Schellekens, 2019. "Explaining Disability Trends in the United States, 1963–2015," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 45(4), pages 819-834, December.
    19. Eliza Lai-Yi Wong & Kin-Fai Ho & Dong Dong & Annie Wai-Ling Cheung & Peter Sen-Yung Yau & Emily Ying-Yang Chan & Eng-Kiong Yeoh & Wai-Tong Chien & Frank Youhua Chen & Simon Poon & Qingpeng Zhang & Sam, 2021. "Compliance with Standard Precautions and Its Relationship with Views on Infection Control and Prevention Policy among Healthcare Workers during COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-11, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:3790-:d:777330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.