IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13274-d942539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polish Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Long- and Short-Form Interfaith Spirituality Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Janusz Surzykiewicz

    (Faculty of Philosophy and Education, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany
    Faculty of Education, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, 01938 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Sebastian Binyamin Skalski

    (Faculty of Philosophy and Education, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany
    Faculty of Education, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, 01938 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Niesiobędzka

    (Faculty of Education, University of Bialystok, 15328 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Loren L. Toussaint

    (Department of Psychology, Luther College, Decorah, IA 52101, USA)

  • Karol Konaszewski

    (Faculty of Education, University of Bialystok, 15328 Bialystok, Poland)

Abstract

Spirituality is widely believed to play an important role in securing health, and modern health care is increasingly being combined with spiritual care. This state of affairs is generating widespread interest in the construct from practitioners and researchers, resulting in the need to develop accurate and comprehensive measures of spirituality. The purpose of this study was to adapt the Polish version of the Interfaith Spirituality Scale (IFS), which consists of twenty-two statements, as well as its short version, including four statements. The IFS is not limited to any one religious denomination, making it possible to conduct research across diverse communities. The analyses were conducted on a sample of 642 Poles aged 18–68, 48% of whom were women. The Polish version of the scale showed high internal consistency (α = 0.96 for the IFS and α = 0.81 for the short version). Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the structure of the IFS consists of a unitary second-order factor with four first-order factors (direct connection with the creator, asceticism, meditation, and divine love). On the other hand, the structure of the short version is unifactorial. There were positive correlations of the IFS with another measure of spirituality, post-traumatic growth severity, mental well-being, and ecological behaviour, as well as negative correlations with post-traumatic stress disorder symptom severity and depressiveness; these confirmed the high validity of the tool. The results suggest that the IFS may be useful in the study of spirituality on Polish soil.

Suggested Citation

  • Janusz Surzykiewicz & Sebastian Binyamin Skalski & Małgorzata Niesiobędzka & Loren L. Toussaint & Karol Konaszewski, 2022. "Polish Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Long- and Short-Form Interfaith Spirituality Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-12, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13274-:d:942539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13274/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13274/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rick Sawatzky & Pamela Ratner & Lyren Chiu, 2005. "A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Spirituality and Quality of Life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 153-188, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sibnath Deb & Esben Strodl, 2019. "Quality of Life and Spirituality in Indian University Students," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 393-408, April.
    2. Richard J. Arend, 2024. "The Advantages of Entrepreneurial Holism: A Possible Path to Better and More Sustainable Performance," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Amy L. Ai & Arthur A. Raney & Bu Huang, 2023. "Well-being Following Hurricane Michael: Complex Pathways Involving Substance Use and Character Strengths," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(1), pages 435-453, February.
    4. Ahmed M Abdel-Khalek & Adel Shokry Korayem & David Lester, 2021. "Religiosity as a predictor of mental health in Egyptian teenagers in preparatory and secondary school," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 67(3), pages 260-268, May.
    5. Christopher Ellison & Daisy Fan, 2008. "Daily Spiritual Experiences and Psychological Well-being Among US Adults," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 88(2), pages 247-271, September.
    6. Christopher Einolf, 2013. "Daily Spiritual Experiences and Prosocial Behavior," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 110(1), pages 71-87, January.
    7. Robert Buckingham & Adelle Sushames, 2021. "The Benefits of Belief: the Place of Spirituality and Religiosity in the CD-RISC," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(2), pages 487-500, April.
    8. Keith Zullig & Rose Ward & Thelma Horn, 2006. "The Association Between Perceived Spirituality, Religiosity, and Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Self-Rated Health," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 79(2), pages 255-274, November.
    9. Kitty Chan & Bas Verplanken & Suzanne Skevington, 2017. "Cross Cultural Application of the WHOQOL-SRPB in the Chinese Community with Diverse Spiritual Affiliations," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 291-312, May.
    10. James Cin Len Khai & Ma. Lourdes C. Medina, 2024. "A Quantitative Study on the Relationship between Spiritual Well-Being and Psychological Well-Being among Novice Clergy and Senior Priests in Myanmar," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(8), pages 680-693, August.
    11. Sefa Awaworyi Churchill & Samuelson Appau & Lisa Farrell, 2019. "Religiosity, income and wellbeing in developing countries," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 959-985, March.
    12. James Schuurmans-Stekhoven, 2011. "Is it God or Just the Data that Moves in Mysterious Ways? How Well-Being Research may be Mistaking Faith for Virtue," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 100(2), pages 313-330, January.
    13. Valerie Møller & Michelle Cocks & Susanne Vetter, 2023. "Nature-Connectedness and Well-Being Experienced During Best and Worst Times of Life: A Case for Safeguarding Biocultural Diversity," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 1053-1089, February.
    14. Kosher, Hanita & Ben-Arieh, Asher, 2017. "Religion and subjective well-being among children: A comparison of six religion groups," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 63-77.
    15. Kyuri Baek & Yunseon Choe & Seungjae Lee & Gyehee Lee & Tae-Il Pae, 2022. "The Effects of Pilgrimage on the Meaning in Life and Life Satisfaction as Moderated by the Tourist’s Faith Maturity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    16. Lance Newey & Rui Torres Oliveira, 2019. "Wellbeing as Emergent from the Leveraging of Polarities: Harnessing Component Interdependencies," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 575-600, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13274-:d:942539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.